arXiv subjects

Jannik Pflieger

Publications and source records attributed to Jannik Pflieger.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

ECCentric: An Empirical Analysis of Quantum Error Correction Codes

Quantum Error Correction (QEC) is essential for building scalable quantum computers, but a lack of systematic, end-to-end evaluation methods makes it difficult to assess how different QEC codes perform under realistic conditions. The vast diversity of codes, an expansive experimental search space, and the absence of a standardized framework prevent a thorough, holistic analysis. To address this, we introduce ECCentric, an end-to-end benchmarking framework designed to systematically evaluate QEC codes across the full quantum computing stack. ECCentric is designed to be modular, extensible, and general, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of QEC code families under varying hardware topologies, noise models, and compilation strategies. Using ECCentric, we conduct the first systematic benchmarking of major QEC code families against realistic, mid-term quantum device parameters. Our empirical analysis reveals that intra-QPU execution significantly outperforms distributed methods, that qubit connectivity is a far more critical factor for reducing logical errors than increasing code distance, and that compiler overhead remains a major source of error. Furthermore, our findings suggest that trapped-ion architectures with qubit shuttling are the most promising near-term platforms and that on noisy devices, a strategic and selective application of QEC is necessary to avoid introducing more errors than are corrected. This study provides crucial, actionable insights for both hardware designers and practitioners, guiding the development of fault-tolerant quantum systems.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Harvest: Resource-Aware Quantum Compilation for Magic State Protocols

Fault-tolerant quantum processors based on topological codes execute programs through lattice surgery, where operations must be mapped, routed, and supplied with magic states across a 2D grid of physical patches. Non-Clifford operations require these magic states, produced either by distillation factories or by cultivation, each trading footprint against preparation latency, and delivering a magic state to the data patches that consume it requires routing through the same shared layout as every other operation. Yet placement, routing, scheduling, and magic-state supply cannot be optimized in isolation: two operations with no circuit-level dependency can still contend for the same ports, routes, or magic-state terminals once placed, so a compiler that decouples instruction scheduling from magic-state generation, or hard-codes a single generation protocol, is forced to trade execution time against layout footprint instead of co-optimizing both across protocols. We present Harvest, a resource-aware compilation approach for lattice-surgery that co-optimizes magic-state consumption with circuit-aware placement and congestion-aware routing under a protocol-agnostic resource model, then reclaims unused layout footprint after scheduling. Across standard benchmark suites (QAOA, QFT, QASMBench), Harvest achieves an average speedup of $4.83\times$ (up to $17.8\times$) over sequential execution, improves schedule length by up to $1.35\times$ through circuit-aware placement, and reclaims up to $72.0\%$ of unused magic-state patches and $33.9\%$ of unused routing patches.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2024

Scalable General Error Mitigation for Quantum Circuits

In quantum computing, error mitigation is a method to improve the results of an error-prone quantum processor by post-processing them on a classical computer. In this work, we improve the General Error Mitigation (GEM) method for scalability. GEM relies on the use of a matrix to represent the device error, which requires the execution of $2^{n+1}$ calibration circuits on the quantum hardware, where $n$ is the number of qubits. With our improved method, the number of calibration runs is independent of the number of qubits and depends only on the number of non-zero states in the output distribution. We run 1853 randomly generated circuits with widths between 2-7 qubits and depths between 10-140 gates on IBMQ superconducting devices. The experiments show that the mitigation works comparably well to GEM, while requiring a fraction of the calibration runs. Finally, an experiment to mitigate errors in a 100 qubit circuit demonstrates the scalable features of our method.

quant-ph↗