SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Jason Siegel

Publications and source records attributed to Jason Siegel.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Health feature extraction from battery energy storage system field fault data

Health monitoring methods are critical for lithium-ion battery modules connected to the grid to prevent faults that can lead to catastrophic events. However, assessing the health of cells in modules from their operational data presents challenges including variable operating conditions, which directly confound health features, and sparse sensing in the modules, particularly within cells in parallel, which prevents observing critical states of individual cells. Here, we present a framework for extracting and calibrating health features for battery modules from their operational data to identify discriminative features for separating faulty parallel-connected cell groups within the modules. We applied this framework to operational data from 25 commercial grid-connected lithium-ion Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) modules. Each module consisted of 14 series-connected parallel groups, one of which was confirmed as faulty via post-mortem investigation; in total, the dataset included 25 faulty and 325 non-faulty cell groups. A statistical evaluation of these calibrated features demonstrated that group-level capacity, capacity degradation rate, and dV/dQ peak heights separate faulty parallel-connected cell groups within the modules with statistical significance (p<0.05). Conversely, group internal resistance did not (p>0.05), indicating that increased resistance was not a primary characteristic of the faults in this dataset. These findings challenge the exclusive reliance on resistance features for fault detection. The observed feature signatures suggest potential failure mechanisms, furthering the understanding of fault behavior in lithium-ion battery modules during field operation. More importantly, this work demonstrates a framework for robustly monitoring the health of cells in lithium-ion battery modules under real-world operations.

eess.SY

Extra Throughput versus Days Lost in load-shifting V2G services: Influence of dominant degradation mechanism

Electric vehicle (EV) batteries are often underutilized. Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) services can tap into this unused potential, but increased battery usage may lead to more degradation and shorter battery life. This paper substantiates the advantages of providing load-shifting V2G services when the battery is aging, primarily due to calendar aging mechanisms (active degradation mechanisms while the battery is not used). After parameterizing a physics-based digital-twin for three different dominant degradation patterns within the same chemistry (NMC), we introduce a novel metric for evaluating the benefit and associated harm of V2G services: \textit{throughput gained versus days lost (TvD)} and show its strong relationship to the ratio of loss of lithium inventory (LLI) due to calendar aging to the total LLI ($\text{LLI}_\text{Cal}/\text{LLI}$). Our results that focus systematically on degradation mechanisms via lifetime simulation of digital-twins significantly expand prior work that was primarily concentrating on quantifying and reducing the degradation of specific cells by probing their usage and charging patterns. Examining various cell chemistries and conditions enables us to take a broader view and determine whether a particular battery pack is appropriate for load-shifting (V2G) services. Our research demonstrates that the decision "to V2G or not to V2G" can be made by merely estimating the portion of capacity deterioration caused by calendar aging. Specifically, TvD is primarily influenced by the chemistry of cells and the environmental temperature where the car is parked, while the usage intensity and charging patterns of EVs play a lesser role.

eess.SY

Lite-Sparse Hierarchical Partial Power Processing for Second-Use Battery Energy Storage Systems

The explosive growth of electric vehicles (EVs) is leading to a surge in retired EV batteries, which are typically recycled despite having nearly 80% available capacity. Repurposing automotive batteries for second-use battery energy storage systems (2-BESS) has both economical and environmental benefits. The challenge with second-use batteries is the heterogeneity in their state of health. This paper introduces a new strategy to optimize 2-BESS performance despite the heterogeneity of individual batteries while reducing the cost of power conversion. In this paper, the statistical distribution of the power heterogeneity in the supply of batteries is used to optimize the choice of power converters and design the power flow within the battery energy storage system (BESS) to optimize power capability. By leveraging a new lite-sparse hierarchical partial power processing (LS-HiPPP) approach, we study how a hierarchy in partial power processing (PPP) partitions power converters to significantly reduce converter ratings, process less power to achieve high system efficiency with lower cost (lower efficiency) converters, and take advantage of economies of scale by requiring only a minimal number of sets of identical converters. Our results demonstrate that LS-HiPPP architectures offer the best tradeoff between battery utilization and converter cost and have higher system efficiency than conventional partial power processing (C-PPP) in all cases.

eess.SY

Comparing Power Processing System Approaches in Second-Use Battery Energy Buffering for Electric Vehicle Charging

The heterogeneity in pack voltages and capacity of aged packs limits the performance and economic viability of second-use battery energy storage systems (2-BESS) due to issues of reliability and available energy. Overcoming these limitations could enable extended use of batteries and improve the environmental impacts of electric vehicles by reducing the number of batteries produced. This paper compares Lite-Sparse Hierarchical Partial Power Processing (LS-HiPPP), a new method for power processing in 2-BESS, to conventional power processing architectures using a stochastic EV charging plaza model. This method for performance evaluation allows a fair comparison among power processing architectures for 2-BESS. Results show that LS-HiPPP increases the battery energy utilization to 94% as compared to 78% for conventional partial power processing (C-PPP) and 23% for full power processing. These results were obtained with 25% heterogeneity in individual battery capacities and 20% power processing within the 2-BESS. Derating and captured value are two derived performance metrics for comparing LS-HiPPP and C-PPP in this work. The derating for LS-HiPPP is 84.3% in comparison to 63.1% for C-PPP. The captured value for LS-HiPPP is 79.8% versus 51% for C-PPP.

eess.SY