Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Javier Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo

Publications and source records attributed to Javier Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Beyond the Townhall: Spatial Anchoring and LLM Agents for Scalable Participatory Urban Planning

LLMs are increasingly explored for public participation, but less is known about how they should be designed around the information citizens encounter beforehand. In an experiment (N=200) on participatory urban planning, participants learned about a sustainability project adapted from a real street redesign, through text and images or narrated 360-degree video with spatial audio and spatial anchoring; they subsequently engaged with factual and reflective LLM personas. The immersive condition improved recall and changed what participants said to the agents: they named beneficiaries more often, asked directionally more project-related questions, and provided more positive feedback. We contribute (1) a conceptualization of LLMs as dialogue partners complementing a shared information baseline, (2) causal evidence that this baseline shapes those conversations, (3) an account of how citizens use and judge factual versus reflective agent roles, and (4) a method for cities to test information packages and agent configurations before public release.

cs.HC↗

OGD4All: A Framework for Accessible Interaction with Geospatial Open Government Data Based on Large Language Models

We present OGD4All, a transparent, auditable, and reproducible framework based on Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance citizens' interaction with geospatial Open Government Data (OGD). The system combines semantic data retrieval, agentic reasoning for iterative code generation, and secure sandboxed execution that produces verifiable multimodal outputs. Evaluated on a 199-question benchmark covering both factual and unanswerable questions, across 430 City-of-Zurich datasets and 11 LLMs, OGD4All reaches 98% analytical correctness and 94% recall while reliably rejecting questions unsupported by available data, which minimizes hallucination risks. Statistical robustness tests, as well as expert feedback, show reliability and social relevance. The proposed approach shows how LLMs can provide explainable, multimodal access to public data, advancing trustworthy AI for open governance.

cs.LG↗

From Particles to Agents: Hallucination as a Metric for Cognitive Friction in Spatial Simulation

Traditional architectural simulations (e.g. Computational Fluid Dynamics, evacuation, structural analysis) model elements as deterministic physics-based "particles" rather than cognitive "agents". To bridge this, we introduce \textbf{Agentic Environmental Simulations}, where Large Multimodal generative models actively predict the next state of spatial environments based on semantic expectation. Drawing on examples from accessibility-oriented AR pipelines and multimodal digital twins, we propose a shift from chronological time-steps to Episodic Spatial Reasoning, where simulations advance through meaningful, surprisal-triggered events. Within this framework we posit AI hallucinations as diagnostic tools. By formalizing the \textbf{Cognitive Friction} ($C_f$) it is possible to reveal "Phantom Affordances", i.e. semiotic ambiguities in built space. Finally, we challenge current HCI paradigms by treating environments as dynamic cognitive partners and propose a human-centered framework of cognitive orchestration for designing AI-driven simulations that preserve autonomy, affective clarity, and cognitive integrity.

cs.HC↗

A Replica for our Democracies? On Using Digital Twins to Enhance Deliberative Democracy

Deliberative democracy depends on carefully designed institutional frameworks, such as participant selection, facilitation methods, and decision-making mechanisms, that shape how deliberation performs. However, identifying optimal institutional designs for specific contexts remains challenging when relying solely on real-world observations or laboratory experiments: they can be expensive, ethically and methodologically tricky, or too limited in scale to give us clear answers. Computational experiments offer a complementary approach, enabling researchers to conduct large-scale investigations while systematically analyzing complex dynamics, emergent and unexpected collective behavior, and risks or opportunities associated with novel democratic designs. Therefore, this paper explores Digital Twin (DT) technology as a computational testing ground for deliberative systems (with potential applicability to broader institutional analysis). By constructing dynamic models that simulate real-world deliberation, DTs allow researchers and policymakers to rigorously test "what-if" scenarios across diverse institutional configurations in a controlled virtual environment. This approach facilitates evidence-based assessment of novel designs using synthetically generated data, bypassing the constraints of real-world or lab-based experimentation, and without societal disruption. The paper also discusses the limitations of this new methodological approach and suggests where future research should focus.

cs.MA↗

Digital Twins: Potentials, Ethical Issues, and Limitations

After Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (AI), the subject of Digital Twins has emerged as another promising technology, advocated, built, and sold by various IT companies. The approach aims to produce highly realistic models of real systems. In the case of dynamically changing systems, such digital twins would have a life, i.e. they would change their behaviour over time and, in perspective, take decisions like their real counterparts \textemdash so the vision. In contrast to animated avatars, however, which only imitate the behaviour of real systems, like deep fakes, digital twins aim to be accurate "digital copies", i.e. "duplicates" of reality, which may interact with reality and with their physical counterparts. This chapter explores, what are possible applications and implications, limitations, and threats.

physics.soc-ph↗