arXiv subjects

Jeffrey S. Kissel

Publications and source records attributed to Jeffrey S. Kissel.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Tale of Two Calibrators: Comparing Newtonian and Photon Calibration in Advanced LIGO after the Third Observing Run

Precise calibration of LIGO's strain readout plays a vital role in our ability to extract information from gravitational-wave detections. We present a comparative analysis of two independent direct-force calibration methods: the Newtonian Calibrator (NCal) and Photon Calibrator (PCal) systems. Currently, LIGO relies solely on the PCal system as its absolute calibration reference. To facilitate comparison, a series of direct-force injections were performed using the NCal and PCal systems at the LIGO Hanford observatory just after the completion of the third observing run. We compute the ratio of the measured to expected strain amplitudes for every injection. For each injection frequency across a 30 Hz band, the ratios of NCal and PCal differ by $\sim$0.5-1%, demonstrating a small systematic difference between the two systems. This offset highlights the importance of maintaining multiple independent calibration references to validate LIGO's calibration.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2026

The impact of physically motivated calibration errors on search pipeline detection parameters for broadband burst Signals

Imperfections in the calibration of gravitational wave observatories introduce frequency dependent amplitude and phase errors on the measured GW signal. Previous unmodelled burst searches have approximated these effects using prescriptions such as a uniform amplitude rescaling or a constant time shift, which do not capture the frequency-dependent structure of calibration errors. This limitation is problematic for core-collapse supernovae, whose predicted GW signals occupy a wide frequency band and exhibit complex time-frequency morphology. In this work, we investigate how realistic calibration errors affect burst search pipelines by combining analytical modelling with large-scale injection campaigns. First-order estimates are derived to quantify how frequency-dependent amplitude and phase errors influence detection statistics such as the coherent network SNR and the correlation coefficient. These calculations predict that the relative impact on the coherent network SNR scales with the signal strength until it reaches an asymptotic value. The effect on the correlation coefficient is most pronounced near the detection threshold and is entirely suppressed at high SNR ratio. Injection studies confirm that calibration errors do modify the detection statistics, but show that the dominant contribution arises indirectly through changes in the number of time-frequency pixels selected in an event. Despite these measurable variations, detection efficiencies as a function of distance differ by less than one percent across all tested waveforms, and explosion-energy limits remain dominated by astrophysical uncertainties rather than calibration uncertainty. These results demonstrate that, at current detector sensitivity, realistic calibration errors have minimal impact on the detectability of broadband GW burst signals. The impact of calibration errors on parameter estimation is left for future work.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2025

Impact of calibration uncertainties on Hubble constant measurements from gravitational-wave sources

Gravitational-wave (GW) detections of electromagnetically bright compact binary coalescences can provide an independent measurement of the Hubble constant $H_0$. In order to obtain a measurement that could help arbitrate the existing tension on $H_0$, one needs to fully understand any source of systematic biases for this approach. In this study, we aim to understand the impact of instrumental calibration errors (CEs) on the measurements of the luminosity distance, $D_L$, and the inferred $H_0$ value. We simulate binary neutron star mergers (BNSs), as detected by a network of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo interferometers at their design sensitivity. We artificially add CEs equal to exceptionally large values experienced in LIGO-Virgo's third observing run (O3). We find that for individual BNSs at a network signal-to-noise ratio of 50, the systematic errors on $D_L$ - and hence $H_0$ - are still smaller than the statistical uncertainties. The biases become more significant when we combine multiple events to obtain a joint posterior on $H_0$. In the rather unrealistic case that the data around each detection is affected by the same CEs corresponding to the worst offender of O3, the true $H_0$ value would be excluded from the 90% credible interval after we combine $\sim$40 sources. If instead, 10% of the sources suffer from severe CEs, the true value of $H_0$ is included in the 90% credible interval even after 100 sources.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2021

Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration in the second half of O3

We present the probability distribution of the systematic errors in the most accurate, high-latency version of the reconstructed dimensionless strain $h$, at the Hanford and Livingston LIGO detectors, used for gravitational-wave astrophysical analysis, including parameter estimation, in the last five months of the third observing run (O3B). This work extends the results presented in Sun et. al (2020) [1] for the first six months of the third observing run (O3A). The complex-valued, frequency-dependent, and slowly time-varying systematic error (excursion from unity magnitude and zero phase) in O3B generally remains at a consistent level as in O3A, yet changes of detector configurations in O3B have introduced a non-negligible change in the frequency dependence of the error, leading to larger excursions from unity at some frequencies and/or during some observational periods; in some other periods the excursions are smaller than those in O3A. For O3B, the upper limit on the systematic error and associated uncertainty is 11.29% in magnitude and 9.18 deg in phase (68% confidence interval) in the most sensitive frequency band 20-2000 Hz. The systematic error alone is estimated at levels of < 2% in magnitude and $\lesssim 4$ deg in phase. These errors and uncertainties are dominated by the imperfect modeling of the frequency dependence of the detector response functions rather than the uncertainty in the absolute reference, the photon calibrators.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2021

Point absorbers in Advanced LIGO

Small, highly absorbing points are randomly present on the surfaces of the main interferometer optics in Advanced LIGO. The resulting nano-meter scale thermo-elastic deformations and substrate lenses from these micron-scale absorbers significantly reduces the sensitivity of the interferometer directly though a reduction in the power-recycling gain and indirect interactions with the feedback control system. We review the expected surface deformation from point absorbers and provide a pedagogical description of the impact on power build-up in second generation gravitational wave detectors (dual-recycled Fabry-Perot Michelson interferometers). This analysis predicts that the power-dependent reduction in interferometer performance will significantly degrade maximum stored power by up to 50% and hence, limit GW sensitivity, but suggests system wide corrections that can be implemented in current and future GW detectors. This is particularly pressing given that future GW detectors call for an order of magnitude more stored power than currently used in Advanced LIGO in Observing Run 3. We briefly review strategies to mitigate the effects of point absorbers in current and future GW wave detectors to maximize the success of these enterprises.

physics.ins-det↗

arXiv2020

Gravitational-wave astronomy with a physical calibration model

We carry out astrophysical inference for compact binary merger events in LIGO-Virgo's first gravitational-wave transient catalog (GWTC-1) using a physically motivated calibration model. We demonstrate that importance sampling can be used to reduce the cost of what would otherwise be a computationally challenging analysis. We show that including the physical estimate for the calibration error distribution has negligible impact on the inference of parameters for the events in GWTC-1. Studying a simulated signal with matched filter signal-to-noise ratio $\text{SNR}=200$, we project that a calibration error estimate typical of GWTC-1 is likely to be negligible for the current generation of gravitational-wave detectors. We argue that other sources of systematic error---from waveforms, prior distributions, and noise modelling---are likely to be more important. Finally, using the events in GWTC-1 as standard sirens, we infer an astrophysically-informed improvement on the estimate of the calibration error in the LIGO interferometers.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2020

Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration

The raw outputs of the detectors within the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory need to be calibrated in order to produce the estimate of the dimensionless strain used for astrophysical analyses. The two detectors have been upgraded since the second observing run and finished the year-long third observing run. Understanding, accounting, and/or compensating for the complex-valued response of each part of the upgraded detectors improves the overall accuracy of the estimated detector response to gravitational waves. We describe improved understanding and methods used to quantify the response of each detector, with a dedicated effort to define all places where systematic error plays a role. We use the detectors as they stand in the first half (six months) of the third observing run to demonstrate how each identified systematic error impacts the estimated strain and constrain the statistical uncertainty therein. For this time period, we estimate the upper limit on systematic error and associated uncertainty to be $< 7\%$ in magnitude and $< 4$ deg in phase ($68\%$ confidence interval) in the most sensitive frequency band 20-2000 Hz. The systematic error alone is estimated at levels of $< 2\%$ in magnitude and $< 2$ deg in phase.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2020

Machine-learning non-stationary noise out of gravitational wave detectors

Signal extraction out of background noise is a common challenge in high precision physics experiments, where the measurement output is often a continuous data stream. To improve the signal to noise ratio of the detection, witness sensors are often used to independently measure background noises and subtract them from the main signal. If the noise coupling is linear and stationary, optimal techniques already exist and are routinely implemented in many experiments. However, when the noise coupling is non-stationary, linear techniques often fail or are sub-optimal. Inspired by the properties of the background noise in gravitational wave detectors, this work develops a novel algorithm to efficiently characterize and remove non-stationary noise couplings, provided there exist witnesses of the noise source and of the modulation. In this work, the algorithm is described in its most general formulation, and its efficiency is demonstrated with examples from the data of the Advanced LIGO gravitational wave observatory, where we could obtain an improvement of the detector gravitational wave reach without introducing any bias on the source parameter estimation.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2012

DC readout experiment in Enhanced LIGO

The two 4 km long gravitational wave detectors operated by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) were modified in 2008 to read out the gravitational wave channel using the DC readout form of homodyne detection and to include an optical filter cavity at the output of the detector. As part of the upgrade to Enhanced LIGO, these modifications replaced the radio-frequency (RF) heterodyne system used previously. We describe the motivations for and the implementation of DC readout and the output mode cleaner in Enhanced LIGO. We present characterizations of the system, including measurements and models of the couplings of the noises from the laser source to the gravitational wave readout channel. We show that noise couplings using DC readout are improved over those for RF readout, and we find that the achieved shot-noise-limited sensitivity is consistent with modeled results.

physics.ins-det↗