arXiv subjects

Jens U. Brandt

Publications and source records attributed to Jens U. Brandt.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Exposing Blind Spots in Deep Imbalanced Regression Evaluation

Deep Imbalanced Regression (DIR) addresses a common failure mode of regression models: target distributions are highly non-uniform, causing models to perform best in densely populated target regions even when reliable performance is required across the full target range. Despite rapid methodological progress, DIR evaluation remains constrained by three blind spots: it is dominated by image-based benchmarks, its standard many-/medium-/few-shot protocol is diagnostic but not decision-complete, and tail-region stability across random seeds has not been systematically evaluated. We revisit DIR evaluation along these three axes. First, we broaden the data domain by evaluating DIR on a multimodal virtual sensing benchmark (\textsc{MuViS}) with nine time-series extrinsic regression tasks across six physical domains, where rare target values often correspond to operationally meaningful regimes. Second, we adopt balanced MAE (\emph{bMAE}) and introduce balanced Mean Absolute Scaled Error (\emph{bMASE}), a scale-normalized metric for decision-complete comparison across methods and datasets. Third, through a repeated reevaluation of six representative DIR methods across multiple random seeds, we show that the tail regions targeted by DIR exhibit particularly high sensitivity to seed-level variability. Our results show that standard virtual-sensing models exhibit substantial tail degradation hidden by global MAE, that existing DIR methods can improve balanced performance but transfer unevenly to multimodal time-series data, and that tail-region instability remains a largely hidden failure mode under current DIR evaluation practice. Together, these findings and our publicly available code provide a reproducible basis for future DIR research toward regression systems that capture rare target regimes as reliably as common ones.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Reliable Virtual Sensing: A Multi-Domain Benchmark for Robustness Under Sensor Failures

Virtual sensing, the estimation of hard-to-measure quantities from available sensor measurements, is a critical enabler for control and monitoring in cyber-physical systems. However, when sensors fail, learning-based predictors can produce physically implausible estimates that propagate to system-level failures. We argue that real-world deployment demands robustness and introduce MuViS-C, the first multi-domain benchmark of robustness against common sensor failures in learning-based virtual sensing. Building on an existing nominal-performance benchmark and established corruption taxonomies, it covers ten sensor failure modes, from subtle drifts to catastrophic signal dropouts, at multiple severities. These are paired with complementary robustness measures capturing average error under corruption, relative degradation, and worst-case fragility. Across nine datasets from six domains, we benchmark six architectures spanning gradient-boosted trees and the major inductive biases for sequence modeling: convolution, recurrence, attention, and MLP-mixing. On the attention-based architecture, we further probe three robustification strategies. We find that (i) every model degrades substantially under corruption, becoming worse than a naïve predictor on at least one corruption setting, (ii) gradient-boosted tree ensembles achieve strong robustness, and (iii) dedicated robustification closes the gap between the attention-based architecture and the most robust models, though each strategy hurts nominal performance. The benchmark's multi-domain design proves essential, as model rankings shift across datasets, and no single domain captures the full robustness picture. MuViS-C is open-source and extensible to new datasets, failure modes, measures, and models.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

MuViS: Multimodal Virtual Sensing Benchmark

Virtual sensing aims to infer hard-to-measure quantities from accessible measurements and is central to perception and control in physical systems. Despite rapid progress from first-principle and hybrid models to modern data-driven methods research remains siloed, leaving no established default approach that transfers across processes, modalities, and sensing configurations. We introduce MuViS, a domain-agnostic benchmarking suite for multimodal virtual sensing that consolidates diverse datasets into a unified interface for standardized preprocessing and evaluation. Using this framework, we benchmark established approaches spanning gradient-boosted decision trees and deep neural network (NN) architectures, and show that none of these provides a universal advantage, underscoring the need for generalizable virtual sensing architectures. MuViS is released as an open-source, extensible platform for reproducible comparison and future integration of new datasets and model classes.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2026

Benchmarking Sensor-Fault Robustness in Forecasting

Cyber-physical system (CPS) forecasting models depend on sensor streams with noisy, biased, missing, or temporally misaligned readings, yet standard forecasting evaluation often selects models by nominal error without showing whether they remain robust under such faults. We introduce SensorFault-Bench, a shared CPS-grounded sensor-fault stress-test protocol for evaluating forecasting architectures and robustness-improvement methods, and an operational taxonomy organizing the method comparison. Across four real-world datasets and eight scored scenarios governed by a standardized severity model, it reports worst-scenario degradation, clean mean squared error (MSE), and worst-scenario fault-time MSE, separating relative robustness from absolute error. A disjoint fault-transfer split lets explicit fault-training methods train on adjacent fault families while evaluation uses separate benchmark scenarios. Empirically, forecasting architectures favored by clean MSE can degrade sharply under faults, and clean-MSE rankings can disagree with worst-scenario fault-time error rankings. Chronos-2, the evaluated zero-shot foundation-model representative, matches or trails the last-value naive forecaster in clean MSE on the two single-target datasets and has the largest worst-scenario degradation on ETTh1 and Traffic, where all channels are forecast targets. For the evaluated robustness-improvement method set, paired deltas show selective degradation reductions: projected gradient descent adversarial training and randomized training lead where value faults dominate observed degradation, while fault augmentation leads where availability faults dominate. SensorFault-Bench provides open-source code, documented data access, and reproduction and extension guides, so new datasets, architectures, and robustness-improvement methods can be evaluated under the same CPS sensor-fault robustness protocol.

cs.LG↗