Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Jeong Hwa Kim

Publications and source records attributed to Jeong Hwa Kim.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Search for sub-millicharged particles at J-PARC

We studied the feasibility of an experiment searching for sub-millicharged particles ($χ$s) using 30 GeV proton fixed-target collisions at J-PARC. The detector is composed of two layers of stacked scintillator bars and PMTs and is proposed to be installed 280 m from the target. The main background is a random coincidence between two layers due to dark counts in PMTs, which can be reduced to a negligible level using the timing of the proton beam. With $N_\textrm{POT}=10^{22}$ which corresponds to running the experiment for three years, the experiment provides sensitivity to $χ$s with the charge down to $5\times10^{-5}$ in $m_χ<0.2$ $\textrm{GeV}/\textrm{c}^2$ and $8\times10^{-4}$ in $m_χ<1.6$ $\textrm{GeV}/\textrm{c}^2$. This is the regime largely uncovered by the previous experiments. We also explored a few detector designs to achieve an optimal sensitivity to $χ$s. The photoelectron yield is the main driver, but the sensitivity does not have a strong dependence on the detector configuration in the sub-millicharge regime.

hep-ex↗

Letter of Intent: Search for sub-millicharged particles at J-PARC

We propose a new experiment sensitive to the detection of millicharged particles produced at the $30$ GeV proton fixed-target collisions at J-PARC. The potential site for the experiment is B2 of the Neutrino Monitor building, $280$ m away from the target. With $\textrm{N}_\textrm{POT}=10^{22}$, the experiment can provide sensitivity to particles with electric charge $3\times10^{-4}\,e$ for mass less than $0.2$ $\textrm{GeV}/\textrm{c}^2$ and $1.5\times10^{-3}\,e$ for mass less than $1.6$ $\textrm{GeV}/\textrm{c}^2$. This brings a substantial extension to the current constraints on the charge and the mass of such particles.

physics.ins-det↗

Estimating the redshift error in supernova data analysis

Recent works have shown that small shifts in redshift -- gravitational redshift or systematic errors -- could potentially cause a significant bias in the estimation of cosmological parameters. I aim to verify whether a theoretical correction on redshift is sufficient to ease the tension between the estimates of cosmological parameters from SNe 1a dataset and Planck 2015 results. A free parameter for redshift shift($Δz$) is implemented in the Maximum Likelihood Estimator. Redshift error was estimated from the Joint Light-curve Analysis(JLA) dataset and results from the Planck 2015 survey. The estimation from JLA dataset alone gives a best fit value of $Ω_m = 0.272$, $Ω_Λ = 0.390$, and $Δz = 3.77 \times 10^{-4}$. The best fit values of both $Ω_m$ and $Ω_Λ$ disagrees heavily with results from other observations. Information criteria and observed density contrasts suggest that the current data from SNe 1a is not accurate enough to give a proper estimate of $Δz$. A joint analysis with Planck results seems to give a more plausible value of the redshift error, and can potentially be used as a probe to measure our local gravitational environment.

astro-ph.CO↗