SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Jeremiah Hendren

Publications and source records attributed to Jeremiah Hendren.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Can extrinsic methods reveal intrinsic structure? Complementing IIT with QStr

Integrated Information Theory (IIT) proposes that all quality is structure: the quality of every experience can be characterized as a phenomenal structure and accounted for as a causal structure. The IIT method can be called intrinsic in that, first, it starts by characterizing the intrinsic structure of a single experience in an absolute sense (not relative to other experiences) and, second, it preserves this intrinsic perspective when accounting for experience in physical terms. By contrast, the method of the Qualia Structure paradigm (QStr) can be called extrinsic in that its main tool is relational characterization, used to investigate both the quality of experience and the corresponding neural or information structures. This chapter gives conceptual clarity to IIT's intrinsic method, assesses the theoretical compatibility between QStr and IIT, and sketches concrete ways QStr can complement IIT. We argue that QStr and IIT share experience and its structure as their explanandum, while their methodological starting points and explanans are distinct yet complementary. QStr can bolster IIT's current research program by offering novel ways to approach narrow qualia (e.g., color), which are notoriously difficult to decompose through introspection. QStr can also supply IIT with new mathematical tools-for example, from category theory and metric geometry. In turn, IIT may help ground QStr's relational, extrinsic structures in absolute, intrinsic structures.

q-bio.NC

Consciousness as Intrinsic Structure: Towards a Chemistry of Experience

To be conscious is to have an experience - not a collection of phenomenal atoms, but a structured whole composed of distinctions and the relations that bind them. Integrated Information Theory (IIT) identifies the essential properties of every experience (axioms), formulates them operationally as postulates that a substrate must satisfy, and unfolds the cause-effect power of the resulting complex into a $Φ$-structure. Accounting for a content of experience is then a matter of identifying the phenomenal distinctions and relations that compose it, and showing them reflected one-to-one in the causal distinctions and relations of the corresponding $Φ$-structure. We apply that method to three pervasive contents whose structure is partly open to introspection. Spatial extendedness is composed of spots, whose elemental signature is reflexivity, bound by reflexive inclusion, connection, and fusion; temporal flow is composed of moments, whose signature is directedness, bound by directed inclusion, connection, and fusion; objects bind a particular configuration of features to a general concept through relations bearing the signature of hierarchy. The endeavor is akin to chemistry, which accounts for an endless variety of compounds from a limited set of elements and the ways they bond. We assess these accounts against seven criteria of a good explanation - scope, synthesis, specificity, self-consistency, system consistency, simplicity, and scientific validation - and sketch the prediction that follows: altering the structure specified by a substrate should alter the corresponding content, even when activity and behavior are held comparable. The same method may reach narrow qualia, which resist introspection, and the compound contents that bind many qualia together, though there it remains a proof of concept and an open research program.

q-bio.NC

Integrated information theory (IIT) 4.0: Formulating the properties of phenomenal existence in physical terms

This paper presents Integrated Information Theory (IIT) 4.0. IIT aims to account for the properties of experience in physical (operational) terms. It identifies the essential properties of experience (axioms), infers the necessary and sufficient properties that its substrate must satisfy (postulates), and expresses them in mathematical terms. In principle, the postulates can be applied to any system of units in a state to determine whether it is conscious, to what degree, and in what way. IIT offers a parsimonious explanation of empirical evidence, makes testable predictions, and permits inferences and extrapolations. IIT 4.0 incorporates several developments of the past ten years, including a more accurate translation of axioms into postulates and mathematical expressions, the introduction of a unique measure of intrinsic information that is consistent with the postulates, and an explicit assessment of causal relations. By fully unfolding a system's irreducible cause-effect power, the distinctions and relations specified by a substrate can account for the quality of experience.

q-bio.NC