arXiv subjects

Jeremy M G Taylor

Publications and source records attributed to Jeremy M G Taylor.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Estimation of Time-Varying Treatment Effects in a Joint Model for Longitudinal and Recurrent Event Outcomes in Mobile Health Data

Not only does mobile health technology enable researchers to track changes in multiple longitudinal outcomes of interest and to record the occurrence of health-related events over time, but it also allows for the delivery of repeated low-cost treatments directly to individuals in real time. We present a model-based approach for estimating the effect of repeatedly delivered treatments in a micro-randomized trial (MRT) via an extension of a joint longitudinal-survival model. We discuss different ways that these repeated treatment effects can be incorporated into the joint model; these different model specifications correspond to different mechanisms by which treatment is assumed to impact the longitudinal and event processes. Taking a Bayesian approach to inference, we model the association between repeated treatments, multiple longitudinally measured outcomes, and recurrent events. We also demonstrate how to calculate information criteria for model selection and present goodness-of-fit plots for assessing survival submodel calibration. We then illustrate the performance of our method via simulations and analysis of data collected in an MRT of substance use.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Multiple imputation with missing data indicators

Multiple imputation is a well-established general technique for analyzing data with missing values. A convenient way to implement multiple imputation is sequential regression multiple imputation (SRMI), also called chained equations multiple imputation. In this approach, we impute missing values using regression models for each variable, conditional on the other variables in the data. This approach, however, assumes that the missingness mechanism is missing at random, and it is not well-justified under not-at-random missingness without additional modification. In this paper, we describe how we can generalize the SRMI imputation procedure to handle not-at-random missingness (MNAR) in the setting where missingness may depend on other variables that are also missing. We provide algebraic justification for several generalizations of standard SRMI using Taylor series and other approximations of the target imputation distribution under MNAR. Resulting regression model approximations include indicators for missingness, interactions, or other functions of the MNAR missingness model and observed data. In a simulation study, we demonstrate that the proposed SRMI modifications result in reduced bias in the final analysis compared to standard SRMI, with an approximation strategy involving inclusion of an offset in the imputation model performing the best overall. The method is illustrated in a breast cancer study, where the goal is to estimate the prevalence of a specific genetic pathogenic variant.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Accounting for not-at-random missingness through imputation stacking

Not-at-random missingness presents a challenge in addressing missing data in many health research applications. In this paper, we propose a new approach to account for not-at-random missingness after multiple imputation through weighted analysis of stacked multiple imputations. The weights are easily calculated as a function of the imputed data and assumptions about the not-at-random missingness. We demonstrate through simulation that the proposed method has excellent performance when the missingness model is correctly specified. In practice, the missingness mechanism will not be known. We show how we can use our approach in a sensitivity analysis framework to evaluate the robustness of model inference to different assumptions about the missingness mechanism, and we provide R package StackImpute to facilitate implementation as part of routine sensitivity analyses. We apply the proposed method to account for not-at-random missingness in human papillomavirus test results in a study of survival for patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2019

A stacked approach for chained equations multiple imputation incorporating the substantive model

Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) has emerged as a popular approach for handling missing data. A central challenge for applying MICE is determining how to incorporate outcome information into covariate imputation models, particularly for complicated outcomes. Often, we have a particular analysis model in mind, and we would like to ensure congeniality between the imputation and analysis models. We propose a novel strategy for directly incorporating the analysis model into the handling of missing data. In our proposed approach, multiple imputations of missing covariates are obtained without using outcome information. We then utilize the strategy of imputation stacking, where multiple imputations are stacked on top of each other to create a large dataset. The analysis model is then incorporated through weights. Instead of applying multiple imputation combining rules, we obtain parameter estimates by fitting a weighted version of the analysis model on the stacked dataset. We propose a novel estimator for obtaining standard errors for this stacked and weighted analysis. Our estimator is based on the observed data information principle in Louis (1982) and can be applied for analyzing stacked multiple imputations more generally. Our approach for analyzing stacked multiple imputations is the first well-motivated method that can be easily applied for a wide variety of standard analysis models and missing data settings. In simulations, the proposed strategy produced unbiased parameter estimates when the analysis model was correctly specified. We developed an R package, StackImpute, allowing this imputation approach to be easily implemented for many standard analysis models.

stat.ME↗