SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Jerrald Meek

Publications and source records attributed to Jerrald Meek.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

P is a proper subset of NP

The purpose of this article is to examine and limit the conditions in which the P complexity class could be equivalent to the NP complexity class. Proof is provided by demonstrating that as the number of clauses in a NP-complete problem approaches infinity, the number of input sets processed per computation performed also approaches infinity when solved by a polynomial time solution. It is then possible to determine that the only deterministic optimization of a NP-complete problem that could prove P = NP would be one that examines no more than a polynomial number of input sets for a given problem. It is then shown that subdividing the set of all possible input sets into a representative polynomial search partition is a problem in the FEXP complexity class. The findings of this article are combined with the findings of other articles in this series of 4 articles. The final conclusion will be demonstrated that P =/= NP.

cs.CC

Analysis of the Deterministic Polynomial Time Solvability of the 0-1-Knapsack Problem

Previously the author has demonstrated that a representative polynomial search partition is required to solve a NP-complete problem in deterministic polynomial time. It has also been demonstrated that finding such a partition can only be done in deterministic polynomial time if the form of the problem provides a simple method for producing the partition. It is the purpose of this article to demonstrate that no deterministic polynomial time method exists to produce a representative polynomial search partition for the Knapsack problem.

cs.CC

Independence of P vs. NP in regards to oracle relativizations

This is the third article in a series of four articles dealing with the P vs. NP question. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate that the methods used in the first two articles of this series are not affected by oracle relativizations. Furthermore, the solution to the P vs. NP problem is actually independent of oracle relativizations.

cs.CC

Analysis of the postulates produced by Karp's Theorem

This is the final article in a series of four articles. Richard Karp has proven that a deterministic polynomial time solution to K-SAT will result in a deterministic polynomial time solution to all NP-Complete problems. However, it is demonstrated that a deterministic polynomial time solution to any NP-Complete problem does not necessarily produce a deterministic polynomial time solution to all NP-Complete problems.

cs.CC