arXiv subjects

Jiachi Chen

Publications and source records attributed to Jiachi Chen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

From Conversation to Evaluation: Benchmarking LLMs on Development Knowledge via SimpleDevQA

The Development Knowledge Question Answering (Dev Knowledge QA) task aims to provide accurate natural language answers to knowledge-seeking questions during software development. To investigate the importance of Dev Knowledge QA in AI-assisted software development and the extent to which it has been explored, we conduct a preliminary analysis of real user-LLM dialogues from WildChat. Our findings indicate that Dev Knowledge QA plays a significant role in real-world software development scenarios, and these raw dialogues cannot be directly used to construct a Dev Knowledge QA benchmark. Existing Dev Knowledge QA benchmarks are limited in development knowledge scope and often not built from real user queries. To bridge this gap, we design a three-phase pipeline that transforms real-world dialogue into simple development knowledge-seeking QA pairs. Through this pipeline, we introduce SimpleDevQA, a multilingual Dev Knowledge QA benchmark inspired by real user dialogues. This dataset covers three languages (English, Chinese, and Russian), and focuses on questions with unique, short, and verifiable answers, making evaluation more accurate and simple. Extensive experiments with 21 mainstream LLMs show that closed-source models generally perform best on SimpleDevQA. We also find that RAG-based knowledge injection improves accuracy, and that Dev Knowledge QA performance correlates with both model confidence and code-generation capability. To facilitate the replication study, we have released our data and code at: https://github.com/DeepSoftwareAnalytics/SimpleDevQA.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

From Faulty Claims to Incorrect Patches: An Empirical Study of Task-Grounded Reasoning in Coding Agents

Large language model (LLM)-based coding agents increasingly resolve real-world software engineering tasks, yet still fail on many of them. Prior trajectory studies characterize these failures through task-agnostic patterns of agent behavior, such as repeated actions. However, an agent may follow a sound workflow yet act on a faulty understanding of the existing code, the task requirements, or a candidate fix. Reasoning models, which power most state-of-the-art coding agents, reveal this understanding in their native chain-of-thought (CoT), whose claims about the task can be checked against the facts. Yet it remains unclear how many such checkable claims the CoT contains, how many are faulty, and whether faulty claims actually cause incorrect patches. We present the first empirical study of such claims, which we term task-grounded reasoning, analyzing 400 trajectories of four open-weight reasoning models on SWE-bench Pro. We extract atomic claims from the CoT with an LLM, assess them against evidence gathered by an LLM agent, and manually trace the defects of incorrect patches back to faulty claims, confirming each link with a claim-corrected replay. Task-grounded reasoning covers only 18.5% of the CoT tokens, yet yields 191 atomic claims per trajectory, at least 9.6% of which are faulty. Faulty claims also occur in 96.7% of the resolved trajectories, so their mere presence is a weak signal of failure. Yet two thirds of the 188 incorrect patches trace back to faulty claims. Correcting such a claim makes the agent fix the linked defect in 89.0% of the cases, and correcting all such claims resolves 11.7% of the failed tasks. Our findings show that the CoT carries task-specific signals for diagnosing and repairing agent failures, but exploiting them requires pinpointing the few faulty claims that actually cause patch defects.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Web3 x AI Agents: Landscape, Integrations, and Foundational Challenges

The convergence of Web3 technologies and AI agents is a rapidly evolving frontier that is reshaping decentralized ecosystems. This paper presents the first comprehensive landscape analysis of the intersection between Web3 and AI agents, examining five critical dimensions: landscape, economics, governance, security, and trust mechanisms. Through an analysis of 979 capitalized Web3-AI agent tokens at a 1 September 2026 cutoff, compared with a cohort of 275 tokens collected at 6 April 2025, we develop a taxonomy and systematically map the current market landscape (RQ1), identifying distinct patterns in project distribution and capitalization. We complement the token frame with on-chain measurement of the agent standards layer: 530,266 ERC-8004 identity registrations across 16 chains and 432,913 x402 settlements on Base. We then investigate four integration domains: AI agents in decentralized finance (RQ2), governance (RQ3), security (RQ4), and Web3 trust mechanisms for agent reliability (RQ5). Infrastructure dominates the landscape in both project count and capitalization; value is highly concentrated (Gini 0.938), and the archived cohort lost 36.4% in capitalization over seventeen months despite token population growth. The agent standards layer shows adoption at scale, but economic throughput remains limited. Across integration domains, AI agents extend DeFi trading and make continuous security auditing affordable, while agents in governance remain largely a blueprint. These findings outline critical considerations for future research toward robust, intelligent, and trustworthy decentralized systems with AI agent interactions.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

The Ghosts of Polymarket: When Off-Chain Matches Meet On-Chain Reverts

Polymarket has emerged as a prominent prediction market platform and one of the fastest-growing applications in DeFi. To achieve low-latency trading, it adopts a hybrid architecture that matches orders off-chain but settles them on-chain for final execution. This design creates a consistency gap we call Ghost Fills: an order that is successfully matched off-chain may later fail during on-chain settlement. To understand the security implications of this gap, we investigate such failed settlements by building GhostHunter, which reconstructs them from on-chain traces and attributes them to concrete attack patterns. Across 2,037,304 reverted matchOrders() transactions, we find that attackers exploit the time gap between matching and settlement to invalidate already matched orders before they are finalized on-chain. We identify four attack vectors, Nonce Bump, Balance Drain, Allowance Revoke, and Proxy Trap, realized via 37 evolving variants. These vectors account for 994,196 of the reverts, enabling risk-free prediction, arbitrage-bot hunting, and liquidity reward manipulation. The cancelled orders spare their owners $103.7 M in net losses that settlement would have locked in, and the attacks cost the operator 2.17 M POL (about $162 K) in gas. During peak hours, up to 24.3% of transactions reverted, causing de facto DoS attacks. We also find that code derived from the flawed contract still appears in 167 independent contracts across 10 chains holding at least $23 M in user funds, extending the impact beyond Polymarket. We have disclosed our evidence to affected parties, and the issue has been partially mitigated.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Understanding Verification Vulnerabilities in Cross-chain Bridges: An Empirical Study

With the rapid development of blockchain technology, numerous heterogeneous blockchains have emerged, each featuring distinct architectures, consensus mechanisms, and application ecosystems. Cross-chain bridges have consequently become a critical infrastructure component, typically relying on smart contracts to facilitate message passing and asset transfers across heterogeneous blockchains. Unlike single-chain contracts, bridge contracts introduce additional verification logic to validate external-chain data, such as state proofs, message sender identities, and signatures. However, correctly implementing such logic is challenging. We refer to vulnerabilities that violate the security guarantees of cross-chain verification as Cross-chain Verification Vulnerabilities (CVVs). To characterize CVVs, we conduct the first systematic empirical study of this vulnerability class. By analyzing 588 security audit reports from 36 real-world cross-chain bridge projects, we derive 11 CVV patterns and organize them into 5 high-level categories according to the affected verification properties. Following this taxonomy, we construct a CVV dataset containing 830 vulnerability instances across 786 contract files. The dataset establishes mappings among audit reports, audited source-code versions, affected source files, and CVV-pattern labels. We then assess existing detection approaches. Current tools provide limited documented coverage of CVV patterns, while only two of four evaluated LLMs outperform an all-pattern constant baseline of 29.3% Macro-F1; the best reaches 51.2%. Together, the limited tool coverage and inconsistent LLM gains motivate detection methods tailored to cross-chain verification semantics.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Demystifying Agent Skills for Smart Contract Auditing: Design, Effectiveness, Behavioral Impact

LLM agents, notably Claude Code and OpenAI Codex, are emerging as versatile tools beyond coding agents only. These agents can be enhanced with skills---reusable artifacts that package domain knowledge, workflows, and tool-use instructions. To date, however, little is known about how such skills are designed or how they affect agent effectiveness and behavior in practice. In this paper, we investigate these questions in smart contract security auditing, a domain in which agents have shown substantial promise. We systematically collect 83 smart contract audit skills from the wild and evaluate them on EVMBench across seven agent--model configurations. Our study examines three dimensions: (i) the design characteristics of audit skills, including their structure, knowledge representations, workflows, and tool dependencies; (ii) their effectiveness in improving vulnerability detection; and (iii) their influence on agent execution trajectories. We find that audit skills are mostly lightweight but heterogeneous in design, covering a broad yet imbalanced range of vulnerability types. Their effectiveness is determined primarily by the model rather than the agent harness: Codex/GPT-5.5 achieves the largest gains, improving detection score by 22.8% and captured award by 43.2%. We further find that skill triggering is a key bottleneck. When triggered, skills preserve a shared six-stage audit workflow while exhibiting distinct loading patterns and differential effects on agent behavior across configurations. We release our skill corpus and artifacts to support future research.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Bridging the Opacity: Evidence-Backed Cross-Chain Transaction Correspondence Reconstruction Across Heterogeneous Blockchains

Cross-chain bridges enable interoperability, but they also break the transaction trails needed to trace illicit funds. Third-party investigators typically cannot access the source-to-destination mappings maintained by bridge backends, and our survey of 131 bridges finds that only 16.79% provide complete public tracking. Existing approaches depend on official APIs, EVM-specific assumptions, or fragile temporal heuristics, limiting their ability to trace transfers across heterogeneous ledgers. We present XSplicer, an evidence-driven system for reconstructing cross-chain transaction correspondence (xTCR) without privileged access to bridge backends. XSplicer derives unified semantic specifications from public protocol documentation and transaction examples, translates them into lightweight parsers and verifiers, and links source and destination transactions by prioritizing hard evidence and using soft clues only when necessary. We evaluate XSplicer on seven bridge protocols spanning EVM, Bitcoin, and Solana. XSplicer achieves 92.5% global recovery rate and up to 98.61% on individual protocols. Under adversarial noise, its hard-evidence verifier retains the correct match in 100% of tested cases, while soft-clue matching degrades as ambiguity increases. In two real-world case studies, XSplicer recovers more than 1,900 historical transaction pairs after Multichain ceased operations and identifies 754 illicit cross-chain transfers worth 105.6 million USD in the Bybit laundering incident. These results show that public protocol invariants can support practical cross-chain forensics without privileged bridge mappings.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

SWE-Gate: Passing Functional Tests Is Not Enough for Software Engineering Agents

Repository-level software engineering benchmarks have significantly advanced the evaluation of coding agents, but existing benchmarks primarily measure whether generated patches pass functional tests and overlook review-derived acceptance constraints (review constraints) that often influence whether a patch is acceptable in real-world software development. We introduce SWE-Gate, a repository-level benchmark for software engineering agents that explicitly evaluates review constraint compliance alongside functional correctness. SWE-Gate derives review constraints from real pull request review comments and synthesizes repository-level repair instances around these constraints. Each instance provides separate functional and constraint tests, together with non-compliant and gold patches, enabling explicit separation between issue resolution capability and review constraint compliance. We construct SWE-Gate with 303 repository-level repair instances spanning 75 open-source Python repositories across diverse software domains. Experiments with four LLM backends spanning different capability levels under a common coding-agent scaffold reveal a substantial gap between functional success and success under the complete repair specification: among 644 repairs that pass the functional tests, 221 fail to satisfy the provided review constraints. These findings show that functional-only evaluation overestimates agents' ability to satisfy the full requirements of repository-level repair tasks. The replication package including code, data, and experimental results is available at https://github.com/DeepSoftwareAnalytics/SWE-Gate.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

The Web4 Agent Economy: A Large-Scale Empirical Study of the Landscape, Challenges, and Opportunities

The Internet is transitioning from Web3 toward Web4, where autonomous agents serve as independent economic actors. These agents can now hold crypto wallets, execute on-chain trades, and pay for external API calls. This transition calls for a new infrastructure stack capable of supporting key agent operations, including agent-to-tool interaction, agent-to-agent payments, and verifiable agent identity, represented by emerging protocols such as the Model Context Protocol, x402, and EIP-8004. Despite growing industrial interest in these protocols, the real-world Web4 agent ecosystem remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we conduct the first large-scale empirical study of the Web4 ecosystem. Specifically, our study targets three interconnected questions: how Web4 agents are deployed and used in practice; what engineering challenges developers face when building Web4 agents; how current project communities respond to these challenges. To answer these questions, we analyze 99,448 multi-chain identity registrations, 317,596,323 transaction logs, the source code of 341 MCP projects, and 349 filtered GitHub issues. Our findings reveal that autonomous agents have established a highly active machine-to-machine payment economy, processing millions of daily transactions. However, this growth is built on immature infrastructure, including identity/authorization practice, cross-environment operation, and payment interoperability. Our follow-up analysis shows that community responses are visible but unevenly distributed across repositories, and payment interoperability remains the most persistent unresolved bottleneck. Overall, this study reveals a critical gap between the rapid growth of the Web4 agent economy and its fragile underlying infrastructure, highlighting future directions for building a more secure Web4 agent ecosystem.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Adaptive Critical Token-Aware Retrieval for Repository-Level Code Generation

The repository-level code generation task requires synthesizing code that satisfies task requirements while remaining consistent with the target repository context. Since real-world repositories often exceed the input length limits of LLMs, existing approaches commonly adopt retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to provide repository-specific context. Despite improving repository-context retrieval, existing methods typically provide context as task-level support, without explicitly identifying the critical tokens that require fine-grained repository context during generation. During the autoregressive generation process of LLMs, errors often concentrate at a small number of decisive positions: once such tokens are generated incorrectly, subsequent code may follow an incorrect semantic path and eventually lead to functional failure. We refer to these positions as "critical tokens". In this paper, we propose ACToR, an adaptive critical token-aware retrieval framework for repository-level code generation. ACToR identifies critical tokens during generation and triggers targeted retrieval on demand to provide repository context at these decisive positions. In addition, we design a position-aware weighting method for dense retrievers to prioritize context that is more informative for generation. We evaluate ACToR on two representative repository-level benchmarks, RepoExec and CoderEval. Experimental results show that ACToR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving relative improvements of 8.4% on RepoExec and 15.4% on CoderEval. Beyond performance gains, we systematically quantify the impact of critical tokens, revealing their central role in major generation failures and highlighting the necessity of targeted retrieval strategies. We provide the code and data at https://github.com/DeepSoftwareAnalytics/ACToR.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Efficient SWE Agent Benchmarking via Trajectory-Aware Evaluation

Evaluating software engineering agents on realistic benchmarks is costly, since each task may require multi-step code exploration, modification, and test execution. Existing efficient evaluation methods select representative subsets to estimate full-benchmark performance, but are largely result-only: they fit historical pass/fail response matrices or static task semantics, discarding how agents solve problems. We propose PTA-IRT, a Privileged Trajectory-Aware Item Response Theory framework that fuses process and outcome signals. Historical execution trajectories supply process-level evidence beyond pass/fail, such as explored context, attempted edits, and solving paths, which PTA-IRT uses as privileged information for calibration subset selection and ability estimation. Under low calibration budgets, PTA-IRT consistently outperforms prior IRT baselines on score and ranking recovery across four SWE benchmarks. Code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/DeepSoftwareAnalytics/PTA-IRT.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

RepoReasoner: Evaluating Repository-Level Code Reasoning Ability of Long-Context Language Models

Recent large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on software engineering tasks, yet most existing benchmarks evaluate code reasoning at the function level, where all relevant information is localized. This setting fails to reflect real-world development, which requires reasoning across multiple files and complex dependency structures. We introduce RepoReasoner, a benchmark for evaluating repository-level code reasoning. It assesses two complementary abilities: Output Prediction, which measures fine-grained, stateful execution reasoning across files, and Call Chain Prediction, which evaluates high-level architectural dependency understanding under noisy context. Our benchmark is constructed through a multi-stage pipeline that leverages dynamic tracing of pytest executions to obtain ground-truth call chains, along with LLM-based I/O rewriting to reduce memorization effects. We evaluate seven state-of-the-art LLMs. Even under oracle context, the best-performing model achieves only 69.1% Pass@1 on Output Prediction, indicating that cross-file reasoning remains a major challenge. In Call Chain Prediction, models exhibit high precision but low recall, suggesting limited multi-hop dependency understanding. Furthermore, performance drops on rewritten data reveal partial reliance on memorization, and longer contexts do not consistently improve results due to noise. These findings highlight fundamental limitations in current LLMs' repository-level reasoning and motivate future work on structured architectural understanding and cross-file inference.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

When LLMs Over-Answer: Measuring and Mitigating Quality Issues in LLM-Based Hardware Description Language Question Answering

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led practitioners to increasingly rely on them for answering questions about hardware description languages (HDLs). Because HDL is ultimately synthesized into physical hardware, an imprecise or redundant answer can propagate into timing violations or non-synthesizable logic that surface only late in the design flow, making the quality of HDL answers especially consequential. However, the quality of LLM-generated responses, particularly in comparison with answers provided by human experts, remains unclear. To investigate this question, we collect 6,246 HDL Q&A posts with accepted answers from Stack Overflow and curate them into a dataset, organized into a taxonomy of four main categories (Conceptual, Debugging, Generation, and Optimization) and ten subcategories. Using this dataset, we design a user study conducted with 19 HDL engineers with one to three years of experience. Our findings reveal a pervasive over answering tendency: LLMs supply correct content but bury it under redundant alternatives (65.7%) and verbose padding (69.1%), while nearly half of answers (49.0%) fail to fully align with expert answers yet participants still preferred LLM responses for readability (58.3%). Motivated by these findings, we propose a multi-agent framework for improving LLM-based HDL question answering. We evaluate answer quality using an LLM-as-Judge and two structural metrics: the number of core answers, which reflects redundancy since LLMs often provide multiple alternative solutions, and the length of non-core content, which reflects verbosity. Evaluated on the four mainstream LLMs, our framework increases the average core-answer quality score from 3.71 to 4.67 (+0.96) and the non-core content quality from 3.72 to 4.23 (+0.51), on a five-point scale.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

PhoenixRepair: Rethinking Repair Strategy Exploration in Software Agents

While Large Language Models have greatly advanced automated issue resolution, existing agent-based methods exhibit a fundamental limitation in their insufficient exploration of repair strategies. This insufficiency manifests in two key aspects. First, the exploration of multiple potential edit locations is limited. Second, the exploration of repair attempts at each location is also insufficient. To address these challenges, we present PhoenixRepair, a multi-agent framework that systematically explores multiple candidate edit locations and performs iterative reflection and refinement on patch generation, thereby expanding the search space of repair strategies. Our framework begins with multi-location sampling, optionally augmented with graph-based localization information for difficult tasks, followed by iterative reflection and refinement to generate better patches, culminating in final-round generation guided by distilled insights from all historical attempts. Experiments on SWE-bench-Verified demonstrate that PhoenixRepair achieves the largest relative improvement of 7.8\% over SWE-agent under DeepSeek-V3.1, and attains the highest resolved rate of 76.0\% Pass@1 under MiniMax-M2.5. Meanwhile, it achieves higher fault localization accuracy than existing approaches. Our code is available at https://github.com/DeepSoftwareAnalytics/PhoenixRepair.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

RISKTAGGER: Evidence-Guided LLM Agent for Post-Incident Forensic Analysis of Money Laundering in Web3

Cryptocurrency money-laundering forensic analysis after Web3 incidents faces challenges such as fragmented evidence, expanding transaction paths, and cross-chain discontinuity. Existing Web3 AML methods largely rely on manual clues and heuristic or graph-search-based tracing, with outputs limited to lists of suspicious addresses and lacking path-level evidence and verifiable explanations. Directly applying general-purpose large language models to raw transaction flows also struggles to ensure evidence constraints and result verifiability. To address these limitations, this paper presents RISKTAGGER, an LLM-guided agent for forensic tracing of Web3 cryptocurrency money laundering. RISKTAGGER embeds the LLM as an evidence-constrained decision component within a controlled tracing loop. It extracts case clues from public incident materials, recursively expands a risk-labeled fund-flow graph over on-chain evidence, and generates evidence-organized reports for analyst review. We evaluate it on five real-world incidents spanning multiple years and covering heterogeneous attack patterns and laundering path structures. We further conduct cross-case generalization analysis, baseline comparison, component ablation, and LLM backend analysis. In the main Bybit case, the system achieves a 97.33% address recall and a 98.69% expert-reviewed sampled address precision. Across the other four incidents, it achieves 95.24-100.00% address recall and 91.27-100.00% expert-reviewed address precision. The cross-case results further show that the complexity of Web3 money laundering arises from heterogeneous mechanisms, including short-cycle fund fragmentation, long-range laundering paths, interwoven DeFi services, and deterministic denomination splitting. RISKTAGGER can recover case-related fund paths, identify high-priority risk accounts, and organize public evidence into verifiable forensic reports.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

AlignCoder: Aligning Retrieval with Target Intent for Repository-Level Code Completion

Repository-level code completion remains a challenging task for existing code large language models (code LLMs) due to their limited understanding of repository-specific context and domain knowledge. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approaches have shown promise by retrieving relevant code snippets as cross-file context, they suffer from two fundamental problems: misalignment between the query and the target code in the retrieval process, and the inability of existing retrieval methods to effectively utilize the inference information. To address these challenges, we propose AlignCoder, a repository-level code completion framework that introduces a query enhancement mechanism and a reinforcement learning based retriever training method. Our approach generates multiple candidate completions to construct an enhanced query that bridges the semantic gap between the initial query and the target code. Additionally, we employ reinforcement learning to train an AlignRetriever that learns to leverage inference information in the enhanced query for more accurate retrieval. We evaluate AlignCoder on two widely-used benchmarks (CrossCodeEval and RepoEval) across five backbone code LLMs, demonstrating an 18.1% improvement in EM score compared to baselines on the CrossCodeEval benchmark. The results show that our framework achieves superior performance and exhibits high generalizability across various code LLMs and programming languages.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

When Large Language Models Meet UAV Projects: An Empirical Study from Developers' Perspective

In recent years, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become increasingly popular in our daily lives and have attracted significant research interest in software engineering. At the same time, large language models (LLMs) have made notable advancements in language understanding, reasoning, and generation, making LLM applications in UAVs a promising research direction. However, existing studies have largely remained in preliminary exploration with a limited understanding of real-world practice, which causes an academia-industry gap and hinders the application of LLMs in UAVs. To address this, we conducted the first empirical study to investigate how LLMs support UAVs. To characterize common tasks and application scenarios of real-world UAV-LLM practices, we conducted a large-scale empirical study involving 997 research papers and 1,509 GitHub projects. The results classified nine common tasks (e.g., Natural Language Command Parsing) in four UAV workflows (e.g., Information Input) undertaken by LLMs in real-world UAV projects and revealed a large difference in the task distribution of research efforts and industry practices. To gain deeper insight into these differences and understand developers' perspectives on the application of LLMs in UAVs, we conducted a survey of practitioners, receiving 52 valid responses from 15 countries. The results revealed that while 40.4% of developers have attempted to apply LLMs to UAV tasks, 59.6% still face challenges integrating their UAV projects with advanced LLM capabilities. Their feedback attributes these challenges to five factors, including technological maturity, performance, safety, cost, and others, and provides practical implications for researchers and developers in conducting UAV-LLM practices.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Balancing Latency and Accuracy of Code Completion via Local-Cloud Model Cascading

Line-level code completion requires a critical balance between high accuracy and low latency. Existing methods suffer from a trade-off: large language models (LLMs) provide high-quality suggestions but incur high latency, while small language models (SLMs) are fast but often suboptimal. We propose MCCom (Model-Cascading-based code Completion), a framework that cascades a local SLM with a cloud-based LLM. To achieve effective cascading, MCCom leverages user actions as a novel signal to trigger the LLM only when the SLM fails, significantly reducing cloud computation costs. Furthermore, we introduce a two-stage speculative decoding strategy and an iterative retrieval mechanism to enhance collaboration between the models. We also train a 121M-parameter lightweight model, which achieves 73.8% of the performance of a 7B state-of-the-art model. Evaluated on RepoEval and a new real-world benchmark StmtEval, MCCom reduces inference latency by up to 47.9% and LLM usage by 46.3%, while improving the LLM's exact match rate by 8.9% through effective collaboration.

cs.SE↗