arXiv subjects

Jiahong Jiang

Publications and source records attributed to Jiahong Jiang.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Hear to See: Discerning Stateful Listening for Audio-Visual Instance Segmentation

Audio-visual instance segmentation (AVIS) requires accurately identifying and tracking individual sounding objects with pixel-level masks. Existing methods struggle to match overlapping acoustic events with visual instances and handle asynchronous audio-visual dynamics. Therefore, two critical questions arise: how can a model establish precise correspondence between overlapping sound sources and visual instances, and how can a model maintain robust tracking when audio and visual signals are temporally misaligned?This paper proposes Hear to See (H2S), addressing these challenges through two mechanisms. The Acoustic-Semantic Projector (ASP) disentangles mixed audio and establishes hierarchical correspondence from semantic to spatial domains. The Asynchronous Dynamics Modulator (ADM) adaptively adjusts state transitions via audio-modulated Mamba, prioritizing current information during dynamic variations and maintaining continuity in stable periods.Experiments on AVISeg show H2S achieves SOTA performance, attaining 48.54 mAP with a COCO pretrained ResNet50 and surpassing the previous by 7.8\%. The code will be open-sourced once the paper is accepted. The source code will be publicly available at https://github.com/leiyeliu/H2S.

cs.MM↗

arXiv2026

AdaSurvMamba: Dynamic Fusion and Semantic Scanning for Multimodal Survival Analysis

Multimodal survival analysis utilizing whole slide images (WSIs) and genomic profiles is fundamental for cancer prognosis. Recently, state-space models like Mamba have emerged as powerful tools for sequence modeling. However, translating this success to complex multimodal tasks is hindered by two critical limitations. First, conventional fusion strategies assume a static multimodal interaction strength, ignoring the fluctuating diagnostic importance of each modality across different patients and local regions. Second, the standard Mamba architecture processes tokens along predefined physical paths. This rigid scanning disrupts the semantic continuity of spatially scattered medical features and exacerbates long-range decay. To address these challenges, we introduce AdaSurvMamba as a novel adaptive framework for multimodal survival analysis. The framework features a Dual-Scale Importance-Aware Reconstruction (DSIR) module to dynamically modulate cross-modal interaction strength. It evaluates diagnostic importance at both the sequence and token levels to reconstruct the input representations. Furthermore, we propose a Semantic Aggregation Scanning (SAS) module to overcome contextual fragmentation. The SAS module dynamically reorganizes discrete tokens into semantically continuous sequences via a shared prototype pool. It explicitly modulates the state transition step size using global modality context and semantic priors to adaptively control the information absorption rate. Experiments across five TCGA cohorts demonstrate consistent gains over existing methods. Code is available at https://github.com/zjlGO/AdaSurvMamba.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Evolutionary Conflict Checking

During the software evolution, existing features may be adversely affected by new changes, which is well known as regression errors. Maintaining a high-quality test suite is helpful to prevent regression errors, whereas it heavily depends on developers. Continuously augmenting the existing test suite based on the new changes can assist developers in investigating the impact of these new changes. And by comparing the executions of the generated test case on two versions, existing techniques are able to detect some common errors. However, the requirements and oracles on the new changes with existing program behaviors are missing. In addition, the new changes may introduce new bugs when they are not sufficiently examined with other unchanged code, which finally fails to meet developers' real intentions on changes. In this paper, we propose the notion of evolutionary conflict checking to validate new changes. By extracting developers' intention reflected by new changes and transforming the linear evolutionary process into one three-way merge, we detect conflicts between existing behaviors and new changes. Our experimental results indicate that evolutionary conflict checking is able to be applied for guaranteeing software quality after changes.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2020

Automated Regression Unit Test Generation for Program Merges

Merging other branches into the current working branch is common in collaborative software development. However, developers still heavily rely on the textual merge tools to handle the complicated merge tasks. The latent semantic merge conflicts may fail to be detected and degrade the software quality. Regression testing is able to prevent regression faults and has been widely used in real-world software development. However, the merged software may fail to be well examined by rerunning the existing whole test suite. Intuitively, if the test suite fails to cover the changes of different branches at the same time, the merge conflicts would fail to be detected. Recently, it has been proposed to conduct verification on 3-way merges, but this approach does not support even some common cases such as different changes made to different parts of the program. In this paper, we propose an approach of regression unit test generation specifically for checking program merges according to our proposed test oracles. And our general test oracles support us to examine not only 3-way merges, but also 2-way and octopus merges. Considering the conflicts may arise in other locations besides changed methods of the project, we design an algorithm to select UUTs based on the dependency analysis of the whole project. On this basis, we implement a tool called TOM to generate unit tests for Java program merges. We also design the benchmark MCon4J consisting of 389 conflict 3-way merges and 389 conflict octopus merges to facilitate further studies on this topic. The experimental results show that TOM finds 45 conflict 3- way merges and 87 conflicts octopus merges, while the verification based tool fails to work on MCon4J.

cs.SE↗