arXiv subjects

Jiangtao Han

Publications and source records attributed to Jiangtao Han.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

AgenticMobility: An Open-Source Platform for Multi-AI-Agent Mobility Dynamics

Understanding mobility dynamics and the effects of urban transportation management policies requires examining how individual travel decisions, traffic conditions, and policy interventions influence one another over time. We present AgenticMobility, an open-source experimental platform for studying how mobility AI agents and other AI agents interact, adapt through repeated experience, and collectively shape mobility outcomes. Persistent agents retain identities and relevant states across rounds, with explicit interfaces defining information access, admissible actions, and decision schedules; linked records trace decisions, execution, and feedback. In the current implementation, large language model (LLM) agents act as travelers choosing routes and departure times and as a manager periodically adjusting link charges within MATSim. A preliminary demonstration spans 100 simulated days in each of five configurations, with one run per configuration and a shared simulation seed. In the joint traveler--manager run, all 1,179,300 finalized target decisions satisfied action constraints; execution checks verified implementation of accepted choices and preservation of personal memories across days. Trajectories show stable route choices alongside departure-time adjustments and differences between controlled-trip and population-wide outcomes. The platform supports experiments on individual adaptation, collective outcomes, and management interventions by varying information access, retained experience, and management feedback. Source code is available at https://github.com/Agentic-City-Research/Agentic-Mobility

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

Reproducing human biases in route choice using large language models: Toward scalable behavioral modeling

Human choice behavior, including route choice, exhibits systematic behavioral biases that deviate from the assumptions of full rationality. Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) has been widely recognized as an effective framework for characterizing such behavioral patterns. However, its large-scale application, particularly in simulation and agent-based modeling, critically depends on specifying individual-level CPT parameters, which remain a major bottleneck. Conventional approaches typically rely on surveys and controlled experiments to calibrate CPT parameters, yet these methods are difficult to generalize and often fail to capture the full diversity of human decision-making. To address this challenge, this paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can reproduce human behavioral biases in choice-making without explicit specification of prospect-theoretic parameters. Using route choice as a representative scenario, we design a behavioral evaluation framework and systematically compare LLM-generated decisions with established human behavioral patterns predicted by CPT. Experimental results demonstrate that LLMs are capable of reproducing non-rational human choice biases and can exhibit decision behaviors consistent with prospect-theoretic effects under uncertainty. These findings suggest that generative AI models may provide a scalable alternative for modeling human decision processes and offer a promising foundation for next-generation large-scale agent-based simulation and AI-driven behavioral research.

cs.AI↗