arXiv2018
In contrast to ordinary graphs, the number of the nowhere-zero group-flows in a signed graph may vary with different groups, even if the groups have the same order. In fact, for a signed graph $G$ and non-negative integer $d$, it was shown that there exists a polynomial $F_d(G,x)$ such that the number of the nowhere-zero $Γ$-flows in $G$ equals $F_d(G,x)$ evaluated at $k$ for every Abelian group $Γ$ of order $k$ with $ε(Γ)=d$, where $ε(Γ)$ is the largest integer $d$ for which $Γ$ has a subgroup isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}^d_2$. We focus on the combinatorial structure of $Γ$-flows in a signed graph and the coefficients in $F_d(G,x)$. We first define the fundamental directed circuits for a signed graph $G$ and show that all $Γ$-flows (not necessarily nowhere-zero) in $G$ can be generated by these circuits. It turns out that all $Γ$-flows in $G$ can be evenly classified into $2^{ε(Γ)}$-classes specified by the elements of order 2 in $Γ$, each class of which consists of the same number of flows depending only on the order of the group. This gives an explanation for why the number of $Γ$-flows in a signed graph varies with different $ε(Γ)$, and also gives an answer to a problem posed by Beck and Zaslavsky. Secondly, using an extension of Whitney's broken circuit theory we give a combinatorial interpretation of the coefficients in $F_d(G,x)$ for $d=0$, in terms of the broken bonds. As an example, we give an analytic expression of $F_0(G,x)$ for a class of the signed graphs that contain no balanced circuit. Finally, we show that the sets of edges in a signed graph that contain no broken bond form a homogeneous simplicial complex.