SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Jihyuk Bang

Publications and source records attributed to Jihyuk Bang.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Factors Influencing Farmers' Motivation to Adopt Smart Farm Technology in South Korea

Smart farming technologies have recently become a major focus because they promise improved agricultural productivity together with sustainability benefits. The rate at which farmers adopt new technologies differs because of various socio-economic and technological factors. This research investigates the main factors affecting smart farm adoption through an evaluation of farmer age, education attainment, land size, government banking, technological hurdles and financial limitations. Statistical analysis of survey responses reveals that farmers under thirty years old and possessing advanced education along with operating expansive farms demonstrate greater willingness to adopt smart farming solutions. Government policies that offer financial assistance and training programs drive farmers to adopt new systems yet technical and financial difficulties prevent broad adoption. The research results demonstrate the requirement for targeted policies that should help farmers by providing specific financial help and digital education programs. This study delivers important knowledge which helps government officials together with agricultural leaders to accelerate the adaptation speed of smart farming technology.

q-bio.PE

Developing Critical Thinking in Second Language Learners: Exploring Generative AI like ChatGPT as a Tool for Argumentative Essay Writing

This study employs the Paul-Elder Critical Thinking Model and Tan's argumentative writing framework to create a structured methodology. This methodology, ChatGPT Guideline for Critical Argumentative Writing (CGCAW) framework, integrates the models with ChatGPT's capabilities to guide L2 learners in utilizing ChatGPT to enhance their critical thinking skills. A quantitative experiment was conducted with 10 participants from a state university, divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group utilized the CGCAW framework, while the control group used ChatGPT without specific guidelines. Participants wrote an argumentative essay within a 40-minute timeframe, and essays were evaluated by three assessors: ChatGPT, Grammarly, and a course instructor. Results indicated that the experimental group showed improvements in clarity, logical coherence, and use of evidence, demonstrating ChatGPT's potential to enhance specific aspects of argumentative writing. However, the control group performed better in overall language mechanics and articulation of main arguments, indicating areas where the CGCAW framework could be further refined. This study highlights the need for further research to optimize the use of AI tools like ChatGPT in L2 learning environments to enhance critical thinking and writing skills.

cs.HC