SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Jimmy Mullaert

Publications and source records attributed to Jimmy Mullaert.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of the npde performance for the evaluation of joint model with longitudinal and TTE data: an application in metastatic hormono-resistant prostate cancer

Introduction: Joint models are increasingly used in clinical trials. An important part of model building is to properly assess the descriptive and predictive ability of these models. Normalised prediction discrepancies (npd) and normalised prediction distribution errors (npde) have been developed to evaluate graphically and statistically non-linear mixed effect models for continuous responses. In this work, we propose to use a combined test to evaluate joint models. Methods: Prediction discrepancies (pd) are defined as the quantile of the observation within its predictive distribution and obtained by Monte-Carlo simulations. The pd for unobserved (censored) event times are imputed in a uniform distribution based on the model prediction of the probability of censoring, using a similar method as the one developed to handle data under the lower quantification limit (LOQ). We propose to combine the p-values of the tests on longitudinal data and on time-to-event (TTE) data, adjusted with a Bonferroni correction. We performed simulation studies based on a joint model characterising the relationship between prostate specific antigen biomarker (PSA) and survival in prostate cancer patients to evaluate the type I error and power of npd/npde to detect different types of model misspecifications. Results: For all types of misspecifications, the type I error of the combined test was found to be close to the expected 5%. The power of the combined test to detect model misspecifications increased with the difference from the true model and as expected, with sample size. Graphically the power increase can be related to larger differences in the shape of the survival function or PSA evolution. Conclusions: npd can be readily extended for event data by imputing the pd for censored event under the model. The test showed an adequate type I error, and was quite sensitive to alternative models tested.

stat.ME

Prevalence and incidence of postpartum depression and environmental factors: the IGEDEPP cohort

Background: IGEDEPP (Interaction of Gene and Environment of Depression during PostPartum) is a prospective multicenter cohort study of 3,310 Caucasian women who gave birth between 2011 and 2016, with follow-up until one year postpartum. The aim of the current study is to describe the cohort and estimate the prevalence and cumulative incidence of early and late postpartum depression (PPD). Methods: Socio-demographic data, personal and family psychiatric history, as well as stressful life events during childhood and pregnancy were evaluated at baseline. Early and late PPD were assessed at 8 weeks and 1 year postpartum respectively, using DSM-5 criteria. Results: The prevalence of early PPD was 8.3% (95%CI 7.3-9.3), and late PPD 12.9% (95%CI 11.5-14.2), resulting in an 8-week cumulative incidence of 8.5% (95%CI 7.4-9.6) and a one-year cumulative incidence of PPD of 18.1% (95%CI: 17.1-19.2). Nearly half of the cohort (N=1571, 47.5%) had a history of at least one psychiatric or addictive disorder, primarily depressive disorder (35%). Almost 300 women in the cohort (9.0%) reported childhood trauma. During pregnancy, 47.7% women experienced a stressful event, 30.2% in the first 8 weeks and 43.9% between 8 weeks and one year postpartum. Nearly one in five women reported at least one stressful postpartum event at 8 weeks. Conclusion: Incident depressive episodes affected nearly one in five women during the first year postpartum. Most women had stressful perinatal events. Further IGEDEPP studies will aim to disentangle the impact of childhood and pregnancy-related stressful events on postpartum mental disorders.

q-bio.QM