arXiv subjects

Jinglin Liu

Publications and source records attributed to Jinglin Liu.

40 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

arXiv2021

FastLR: Non-Autoregressive Lipreading Model with Integrate-and-Fire

Lipreading is an impressive technique and there has been a definite improvement of accuracy in recent years. However, existing methods for lipreading mainly build on autoregressive (AR) model, which generate target tokens one by one and suffer from high inference latency. To breakthrough this constraint, we propose FastLR, a non-autoregressive (NAR) lipreading model which generates all target tokens simultaneously. NAR lipreading is a challenging task that has many difficulties: 1) the discrepancy of sequence lengths between source and target makes it difficult to estimate the length of the output sequence; 2) the conditionally independent behavior of NAR generation lacks the correlation across time which leads to a poor approximation of target distribution; 3) the feature representation ability of encoder can be weak due to lack of effective alignment mechanism; and 4) the removal of AR language model exacerbates the inherent ambiguity problem of lipreading. Thus, in this paper, we introduce three methods to reduce the gap between FastLR and AR model: 1) to address challenges 1 and 2, we leverage integrate-and-fire (I\&F) module to model the correspondence between source video frames and output text sequence. 2) To tackle challenge 3, we add an auxiliary connectionist temporal classification (CTC) decoder to the top of the encoder and optimize it with extra CTC loss. We also add an auxiliary autoregressive decoder to help the feature extraction of encoder. 3) To overcome challenge 4, we propose a novel Noisy Parallel Decoding (NPD) for I\&F and bring Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) into lipreading. Our experiments exhibit that FastLR achieves the speedup up to 10.97$\times$ comparing with state-of-the-art lipreading model with slight WER absolute increase of 1.5\% and 5.5\% on GRID and LRS2 lipreading datasets respectively, which demonstrates the effectiveness of our proposed method.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2020

DenoiSpeech: Denoising Text to Speech with Frame-Level Noise Modeling

While neural-based text to speech (TTS) models can synthesize natural and intelligible voice, they usually require high-quality speech data, which is costly to collect. In many scenarios, only noisy speech of a target speaker is available, which presents challenges for TTS model training for this speaker. Previous works usually address the challenge using two methods: 1) training the TTS model using the speech denoised with an enhancement model; 2) taking a single noise embedding as input when training with noisy speech. However, they usually cannot handle speech with real-world complicated noise such as those with high variations along time. In this paper, we develop DenoiSpeech, a TTS system that can synthesize clean speech for a speaker with noisy speech data. In DenoiSpeech, we handle real-world noisy speech by modeling the fine-grained frame-level noise with a noise condition module, which is jointly trained with the TTS model. Experimental results on real-world data show that DenoiSpeech outperforms the previous two methods by 0.31 and 0.66 MOS respectively.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2020

Task-Level Curriculum Learning for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation

Non-autoregressive translation (NAT) achieves faster inference speed but at the cost of worse accuracy compared with autoregressive translation (AT). Since AT and NAT can share model structure and AT is an easier task than NAT due to the explicit dependency on previous target-side tokens, a natural idea is to gradually shift the model training from the easier AT task to the harder NAT task. To smooth the shift from AT training to NAT training, in this paper, we introduce semi-autoregressive translation (SAT) as intermediate tasks. SAT contains a hyperparameter k, and each k value defines a SAT task with different degrees of parallelism. Specially, SAT covers AT and NAT as its special cases: it reduces to AT when k = 1 and to NAT when k = N (N is the length of target sentence). We design curriculum schedules to gradually shift k from 1 to N, with different pacing functions and number of tasks trained at the same time. We called our method as task-level curriculum learning for NAT (TCL-NAT). Experiments on IWSLT14 De-En, IWSLT16 En-De, WMT14 En-De and De-En datasets show that TCL-NAT achieves significant accuracy improvements over previous NAT baselines and reduces the performance gap between NAT and AT models to 1-2 BLEU points, demonstrating the effectiveness of our proposed method.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2020

A Study of Non-autoregressive Model for Sequence Generation

Non-autoregressive (NAR) models generate all the tokens of a sequence in parallel, resulting in faster generation speed compared to their autoregressive (AR) counterparts but at the cost of lower accuracy. Different techniques including knowledge distillation and source-target alignment have been proposed to bridge the gap between AR and NAR models in various tasks such as neural machine translation (NMT), automatic speech recognition (ASR), and text to speech (TTS). With the help of those techniques, NAR models can catch up with the accuracy of AR models in some tasks but not in some others. In this work, we conduct a study to understand the difficulty of NAR sequence generation and try to answer: (1) Why NAR models can catch up with AR models in some tasks but not all? (2) Why techniques like knowledge distillation and source-target alignment can help NAR models. Since the main difference between AR and NAR models is that NAR models do not use dependency among target tokens while AR models do, intuitively the difficulty of NAR sequence generation heavily depends on the strongness of dependency among target tokens. To quantify such dependency, we propose an analysis model called CoMMA to characterize the difficulty of different NAR sequence generation tasks. We have several interesting findings: 1) Among the NMT, ASR and TTS tasks, ASR has the most target-token dependency while TTS has the least. 2) Knowledge distillation reduces the target-token dependency in target sequence and thus improves the accuracy of NAR models. 3) Source-target alignment constraint encourages dependency of a target token on source tokens and thus eases the training of NAR models.

cs.CL↗