arXiv subjects

Jinxin Tan

Publications and source records attributed to Jinxin Tan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

LQCDMaster: Agentic Scientific Computing for Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics Research

Lattice quantum chromodynamics (LQCD) provides a first-principles framework for computing hadronic observables, but its practical use remains limited by the substantial expertise required to turn research motivation into reliable computing workflows. Here we present \textsc{LQCDMaster}, a tool-augmented, skill-guided and domain-specialized scientific computing agent that converts natural-language LQCD research tasks into executable PyQUDA computing workflows, including measurement scripts, job-submission artifacts, execution logs and numerical outputs. The system combines agentic planning, expert-annotated LQCD skills and a deterministic Wick-contraction tool to constrain the algebraically fragile components of code generation. We evaluate \textsc{LQCDMaster} on a benchmark at the forefront of scientific research, comprising 70 LQCD computing tasks, with observables covering local and nonlocal two-point functions, Wilson loops, meson and baryon three-point functions. The generated workflows exactly reproduce expert-written implementations in 63 of 70 tasks at machine precision, with three additional discrepancies attributable to convention mismatches. Across representative observables, the agent reduces implementation time from hours to minutes while preserving end-to-end numerical validation. Further, we present a typical case of \textsc{LQCDMaster}-driven exploration: a lattice computation of light-cone distribution amplitudes with diagonal Wilson-line, a quantity accessible with standard methods but never before computed, and computation of the spectrum of proton, deuteron, triton, hyperon, hyperdeuteron and hypertriton. This work pioneers the paradigm of agentic scientific computing by automating the end-to-end scientific computing workflows in lattice QCD research, lowering its barrier and facilitating the exploration and verification of non-standard scientific ideas.

hep-lat↗

arXiv2026

PRL-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark Evaluating LLMs' Capabilities in Frontier Physics Research

The paradigm of agentic science requires AI systems to conduct robust reasoning and engage in long-horizon, autonomous exploration. However, current scientific benchmarks remain confined to domain knowledge comprehension and complex reasoning, failing to evaluate the exploratory nature and procedural complexity of real-world research. In this work, we present research-oriented evaluations in theoretical and computational physics, a natural testbed with comprehensive domain knowledge, complex reasoning, and verifiable end-to-end workflows without reliance on experiments. Here we introduce PRL-Bench (Physics Research by LLMs), a benchmark designed to systematically map the capability boundaries of LLMs in executing end-to-end physics research. Constructed from 100 curated papers from the latest issues of Physical Review Letters since August 2025 and validated by domain experts, PRL-Bench covers five major theory- and computation-intensive subfields of modern physics: astrophysics, condensed matter physics, high-energy physics, quantum information, and statistical physics. Each task in the benchmark is designed to replicate the core properties of authentic scientific research, including exploration-oriented formulation, long-horizon workflows, and objective verifiability, thereby reconstructing the essential reasoning processes and research workflows of real physics research. Evaluation across frontier models shows that performance remains limited, with the best overall score below 50, revealing a pronounced gap between current LLM capabilities and the demands of real scientific research. PRL-Bench serves a reliable testbed for accessing next generation AI scientists advancing AI systems toward autonomous scientific discovery.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

PhysMaster: Building an Autonomous AI Physicist for Theoretical and Computational Physics Research

Advances in LLM reasoning and tool use have enabled agentic science, yet frontier theoretical and computational physics remains challenging because research requires deep domain expertise, long-horizon reasoning, and reliable numerical computation. We introduce PRL-Bench, a research-reproduction benchmark adapted from 100 Physical Review Letters papers across major areas of modern physics. PRL-Bench distills realistic research workflows into traceable tasks with explicit intermediate artifacts and diverse evaluation rubrics; each task is estimated by domain experts to require more than six hours for a specialized PhD student to reproduce independently. Evaluations show that existing agents remain unreliable on extended research workflows. We therefore present PhysMaster, a scientific agent combining adaptive MCTS-based multi-trajectory exploration with hierarchical memory to improve long-horizon robustness and knowledge accumulation. PhysMaster achieves the highest overall PRL-Bench score of 51.08, outperforming Codex, OpenHands, OpenClaw, and ReAct, and yields relative improvements of 14.13 percent to 93.38 percent across backbone models. Error analysis shows that PhysMaster substantially reduces failures from incomplete long-horizon execution, while remaining bottlenecks lie in physics knowledge and analytical reasoning. Together, PRL-Bench and PhysMaster provide a rigorous benchmark and effective system for advancing autonomous AI research in frontier physics.

cs.AI↗