arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Jisu Jeong.
The maximum matching width is a graph width parameter that is defined on a branch-decomposition over the vertex set of a graph. In this short paper, we prove that the problem of computing the maximum matching width is NP-hard.
Given n subspaces of a finite-dimensional vector space over a fixed finite field $\mathbb F$, we wish to find a linear layout $V_1,V_2,\ldots,V_n$ of the subspaces such that $\dim((V_1+V_2+\cdots+V_i) \cap (V_{i+1}+\cdots+V_n))\le k$ for all i, such a linear layout is said to have width at most k. When restricted to 1-dimensional subspaces, this problem is equivalent to computing the trellis-width (or minimum trellis state-complexity) of a linear code in coding theory and computing the path-width of an $\mathbb F$-represented matroid in matroid theory. We present a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm to construct a linear layout of width at most k, if it exists, for input subspaces of a finite-dimensional vector space over $\mathbb F$. As corollaries, we obtain a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm to produce a path-decomposition of width at most k for an input $\mathbb F$-represented matroid of path-width at most k, and a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm to find a linear rank-decomposition of width at most k for an input graph of linear rank-width at most k. In both corollaries, no such algorithms were known previously. It was previously known that a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm exists for the decision version of the problem for matroid path-width, a theorem by Geelen, Gerards, and Whittle~(2002) implies that for each fixed finite field $\mathbb F$, there are finitely many forbidden $\mathbb F$-representable minors for the class of matroids of path-width at most k. An algorithm by Hliněný (2006) can detect a minor in an input $\mathbb F$-represented matroid of bounded branch-width. However, this indirect approach would not produce an actual path-decomposition. Our algorithm is the first one to construct such a path-decomposition and does not depend on the finiteness of forbidden minors.
The maximum matching width is a width-parameter that is defined on a branch-decomposition over the vertex set of a graph. The size of a maximum matching in the bipartite graph is used as a cut-function. In this paper, we characterize the graphs of maximum matching width at most 2 using the minor obstruction set. Also, we compute the exact value of the maximum matching width of a grid.
We give alternative definitions for maximum matching width, e.g. a graph $G$ has $\operatorname{mmw}(G) \leq k$ if and only if it is a subgraph of a chordal graph $H$ and for every maximal clique $X$ of $H$ there exists $A,B,C \subseteq X$ with $A \cup B \cup C=X$ and $|A|,|B|,|C| \leq k$ such that any subset of $X$ that is a minimal separator of $H$ is a subset of either $A, B$ or $C$. Treewidth and branchwidth have alternative definitions through intersections of subtrees, where treewidth focuses on nodes and branchwidth focuses on edges. We show that mm-width combines both aspects, focusing on nodes and on edges. Based on this we prove that given a graph $G$ and a branch decomposition of mm-width $k$ we can solve Dominating Set in time $O^*({8^k})$, thereby beating $O^*(3^{\operatorname{tw}(G)})$ whenever $\operatorname{tw}(G) > \log_3{8} \times k \approx 1.893 k$. Note that $\operatorname{mmw}(G) \leq \operatorname{tw}(G)+1 \leq 3 \operatorname{mmw}(G)$ and these inequalities are tight. Given only the graph $G$ and using the best known algorithms to find decompositions, maximum matching width will be better for solving Dominating Set whenever $\operatorname{tw}(G) > 1.549 \times \operatorname{mmw}(G)$.
A graph is $(d_1, ..., d_r)$-colorable if its vertex set can be partitioned into $r$ sets $V_1, ..., V_r$ so that the maximum degree of the graph induced by $V_i$ is at most $d_i$ for each $i\in \{1, ..., r\}$. For a given pair $(g, d_1)$, the question of determining the minimum $d_2=d_2(g; d_1)$ such that planar graphs with girth at least $g$ are $(d_1, d_2)$-colorable has attracted much interest. The finiteness of $d_2(g; d_1)$ was known for all cases except when $(g, d_1)=(5, 1)$. Montassier and Ochem explicitly asked if $d_2(5; 1)$ is finite. We answer this question in the affirmative with $d_2(5; 1)\leq 10$; namely, we prove that all planar graphs with girth at least $5$ are $(1, 10)$-colorable. Moreover, our proof extends to the statement that for any surface $S$ of Euler genus $γ$, there exists a $K=K(γ)$ where graphs with girth at least $5$ that are embeddable on $S$ are $(1, K)$-colorable. On the other hand, there is no finite $k$ where planar graphs (and thus embeddable on any surface) with girth at least $5$ are $(0, k)$-colorable.
Linear rank-width is a graph width parameter, which is a variation of rank-width by restricting its tree to a caterpillar. As a corollary of known theorems, for each $k$, there is a finite obstruction set $\mathcal{O}_k$ of graphs such that a graph $G$ has linear rank-width at most $k$ if and only if no vertex-minor of $G$ is isomorphic to a graph in $\mathcal{O}_k$. However, no attempts have been made to bound the number of graphs in $\mathcal{O}_k$ for $k\ge 2$. We show that for each $k$, there are at least $2^{Ω(3^k)}$ pairwise locally non-equivalent graphs in $\mathcal{O}_k$, and therefore the number of graphs in $\mathcal{O}_k$ is at least double exponential. To prove this theorem, it is necessary to characterize when two graphs in $\mathcal O_k$ are locally equivalent. A graph is a block graph if all of its blocks are complete graphs. We prove that if two block graphs without simplicial vertices of degree at least $2$ are locally equivalent, then they are isomorphic. This not only is useful for our theorem but also implies a theorem of Bouchet [Transforming trees by successive local complementations, J. Graph Theory 12 (1988), no. 2, 195-207] stating that if two trees are locally equivalent, then they are isomorphic.