arXiv subjects

Joachim Orthaber

Publications and source records attributed to Joachim Orthaber.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Separable Drawings: Extendability and Crossing-Free Hamiltonian Cycles

Generalizing pseudospherical drawings, we introduce a new class of simple drawings, which we call separable drawings. In a separable drawing, every edge can be closed to a simple curve that intersects each other edge at most once. For different edges, the non-edge parts of these curves may interact arbitrarily though. Most notably, we show that (1) every separable drawing of any graph on $n$ vertices in the plane can be extended to a simple drawing of the complete graph $K_n$, (2) every separable drawing of $K_n$ contains a crossing-free Hamiltonian cycle and is plane Hamiltonian connected (that is, it contains a crossing-free Hamiltonian path between each pair of vertices), and (3) every generalized convex drawing and every 2-page book drawing is separable. Further, the class of separable drawings is a proper superclass of the union of generalized convex and 2-page book drawings. Hence, our results on plane Hamiltonicity extend recent work on generalized convex drawings by Bergold et al. (DCG 2025).

cs.CG↗

arXiv2026

Holes in Convex and Simple Drawings

Gons and holes in point sets have been extensively studied in the literature. For simple drawings of the complete graph a generalization of the Erdős--Szekeres theorem is known and empty triangles have been investigated. We introduce a notion of $k$-holes for simple drawings and survey generalizations thereof, like empty $k$-cycles. We present a family of simple drawings without $4$-holes and prove a generalization of Gerken's empty hexagon theorem for convex drawings. A crucial intermediate step is the structural investigation of pseudolinear subdrawings in convex drawings. With respect to empty $k$-cycles, we show the existence of empty $4$-cycles in every simple drawing of $K_n$ and give a construction that admits only $Θ(n^2)$ of them.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2026

Plane Hamiltonian Cycles in Convex Drawings

A conjecture by Rafla from 1988 asserts that every simple drawing of the complete graph $K_n$ admits a plane Hamiltonian cycle. It turned out that already the existence of much simpler non-crossing substructures in such drawings is hard to prove. Recent progress was made by Aichholzer et al. and by Suk and Zeng who proved the existence of a plane path of length $Ω(\log n / \log \log n)$ and of a plane matching of size $Ω(n^{1/2})$ in every simple drawing of $K_n$. Instead of studying simpler substructures, we prove Rafla's conjecture for the subclass of convex drawings, the most general class in the convexity hierarchy introduced by Arroyo et al. Moreover, we show that every convex drawing of $K_n$ contains a plane Hamiltonian path between each pair of vertices (Hamiltonian connectivity) and a plane $k$-cycle for each $3 \leq k \leq n$ (pancyclicity), and present further results on maximal plane subdrawings.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2025

On the Uncrossed Number of Graphs

Visualizing a graph $G$ in the plane nicely, for example, without crossings, is unfortunately not always possible. To address this problem, Masařík and Hliněný [GD 2023] recently asked for each edge of $G$ to be drawn without crossings while allowing multiple different drawings of $G$. More formally, a collection $\mathcal{D}$ of drawings of $G$ is uncrossed if, for each edge $e$ of $G$, there is a drawing in $\mathcal{D}$ such that $e$ is uncrossed. The uncrossed number $\mathrm{unc}(G)$ of $G$ is then the minimum number of drawings in some uncrossed collection of $G$. No exact values of the uncrossed numbers have been determined yet, not even for simple graph classes. In this paper, we provide the exact values for uncrossed numbers of complete and complete bipartite graphs, partly confirming and partly refuting a conjecture posed by Hliněný and Masařík. We also present a strong general lower bound on $\mathrm{unc}(G)$ in terms of the number of vertices and edges of $G$. Moreover, we prove NP-hardness of the related problem of determining the edge crossing number of a graph $G$, which is the smallest number of edges of $G$ taken over all drawings of $G$ that participate in a crossing. This problem was posed as open by Schaefer in his book [Crossing Numbers of Graphs 2018].

math.CO↗

arXiv2024

Subgraph-universal planar graphs for trees

We show that there exists an outerplanar graph on $O(n^{c})$ vertices for $c = \log_2(3+\sqrt{10}) \approx 2.623$ that contains every tree on $n$ vertices as a subgraph. This extends a result of Chung and Graham from 1983 who showed that there exist (non-planar) $n$-vertex graphs with $O(n \log n)$ edges that contain all trees on $n$ vertices as subgraphs and a result from Gol'dberg and Livshits from 1968 who showed that there exists a universal tree for $n$-vertex trees on $n^{O(\log(n))}$ vertices. Furthermore, we determine the number of vertices needed in the worst case for a planar graph to contain three given trees as subgraph to be on the order of $\frac{3}{2}n$, even if the three trees are caterpillars. This answers a question recently posed by Alecu et al. in 2024. Lastly, we investigate (outer)planar graphs containing all (outer)planar graphs as subgraph, determining exponential lower bounds in both cases. We also construct a planar graph on $n^{O(\log(n))}$ vertices containing all $n$-vertex outerplanar graphs as subgraphs.

math.CO↗

arXiv2024

Graph drawing applications in combinatorial theory of maturity models

In this paper, we introduce tiled graphs as models of learning and maturing processes. We show how tiled graphs can combine graphs of learning spaces or antimatroids (partial hypercubes) and maturity models (total orders) to yield models of learning processes. For the visualization of these processes it is a natural approach to aim for certain optimal drawings. We show for most of the more detailed models that the drawing problems resulting from them are NP-complete. The terse model of a maturing process that ignores the details of learning, however, results in a polynomially solvable graph drawing problem. In addition, this model provides insight into the process by ordering the subjects at each test of their maturity. We investigate extremal and random instances of this problem, and provide exact results and bounds on their optimal crossing number. Graph-theoretic models offer two approaches to the design of optimal maturity models given observed data: (1) minimizing intra-subject inconsistencies, which manifest as regressions of subjects, is modeled as the well-known feedback arc set problem. We study the alternative of (2) finding a maturity model by minimizing the inter-subject inconsistencies, which manifest as crossings in the respective drawing. We show this to be NP-complete.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2024

Towards Crossing-Free Hamiltonian Cycles in Simple Drawings of Complete Graphs

It is a longstanding conjecture that every simple drawing of a complete graph on $n \geq 3$ vertices contains a crossing-free Hamiltonian cycle. We strengthen this conjecture to "there exists a crossing-free Hamiltonian path between each pair of vertices" and show that this stronger conjecture holds for several classes of simple drawings, including strongly c-monotone drawings and cylindrical drawings. As a second main contribution, we give an overview on different classes of simple drawings and investigate inclusion relations between them up to weak isomorphism.

math.CO↗

arXiv2021

Edge Partitions of Complete Geometric Graphs (Part 1)

In this paper, we disprove the long-standing conjecture that any complete geometric graph on $2n$ vertices can be partitioned into $n$ plane spanning trees. Our construction is based on so-called bumpy wheel sets. We fully characterize which bumpy wheels can and in particular which \emph{cannot} be partitioned into plane spanning trees (or even into arbitrary plane \emph{subgraphs}), including a complete description of all possible partitions (into plane spanning trees). Furthermore, we show a sufficient condition for \emph{generalized wheels} to not admit a partition into plane spanning trees, and give a complete characterization when they admit a partition into plane spanning double stars.

math.CO↗

arXiv2021

Edge Partitions of Complete Geometric Graphs (Part 2)

Recently, the second and third author showed that complete geometric graphs on $2n$ vertices in general cannot be partitioned into $n$ plane spanning trees. Building up on this work, in this paper, we initiate the study of partitioning into beyond planar subgraphs, namely into $k$-planar and $k$-quasi-planar subgraphs and obtain first bounds on the number of subgraphs required in this setting.

math.CO↗