Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

John A. Baldwin

Publications and source records attributed to John A. Baldwin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

L-spaces and knot traces

There has been a great deal of interest in understanding which knots are characterized by which of their Dehn surgeries. We study a 4-dimensional version of this question: which knots are determined by which of their traces? We prove several results that are in stark contrast with what is known about characterizing surgeries, most notably that the 0-trace detects every L-space knot. Our proof combines tools in Heegaard Floer homology with results about surface homeomorphisms and their dynamics. We also consider nonzero traces, proving for instance that each positive torus knot is determined by its $n$-trace for any $n\leq 0$, whereas no non-positive integer is known to be a characterizing slope for any positive torus knot besides the right-handed trefoil.

math.GT↗

Ribbon concordance and fibered predecessors, II: the general case

The first and third authors recently proved that for each knot $K\subset S^3$ there are only finitely many hyperbolic fibered knots which are ribbon concordant to $K$. In this paper, we remove the hyperbolic constraint, proving that every knot in $S^3$ has only finitely many fibered predecessors under ribbon concordance. The key new input is an inequality relating the knot Floer homology of a generalized satellite knot with that of its companion, proved via the immersed curves formulation of bordered Heegaard Floer homology, which should be of independent interest. Our work, together with results of Kojima--McShane, also leads to an explicit upper bound on the Gromov norm of the complement of any fibered predecessor of a knot $K \subset S^3$, in terms of the arc index and genus of $K$.

math.GT↗

Torus knots, the A-polynomial, and SL(2,C)

The A-polynomial of a knot is defined in terms of SL(2,C) representations of the knot group, and encodes information about essential surfaces in the knot complement. In 2005, Dunfield-Garoufalidis and Boyer-Zhang proved that it detects the unknot using Kronheimer-Mrowka's work on the Property P conjecture. Here we use more recent results from instanton Floer homology to prove that a version of the A-polynomial detects whether a knot is a torus knot. We moreover completely determine which individual torus knots are detected by this A-polynomial. These results enable progress towards a folklore conjecture about boundary slopes of non-torus knots. Finally, we use similar ideas to prove that a knot in the 3-sphere admits infinitely many SL(2,C)-abelian Dehn surgeries if and only if it is a torus knot, affirming a variant of a conjecture due to Sivek-Zentner.

math.GT↗

Ribbon concordance and fibered predecessors

Given any knot K in the 3-sphere, we prove that there are only finitely many hyperbolic fibered knots which are ribbon concordant to K. It follows that every fibered knot in the 3-sphere has only finitely many hyperbolic predecessors under ribbon concordance. Our proof combines results about maps on Floer homology induced by ribbon cobordisms with a relationship between the knot Floer homology of a fibered knot and fixed points of its monodromy. We then use the same techniques in combination with results of Cornish and Kojima-McShane to prove an inequality relating the volumes of ribbon concordant hyperbolic fibered knots.

math.GT↗

Pseudo-Anosov flows on hyperbolic L-spaces

We prove that for each $n\in\mathbb{N}$ there is a hyperbolic L-space with $n$ pseudo-Anosov flows, no two of which are orbit equivalent. These flows have no perfect fits and are thus quasigeodesic. In addition, our flows admit positive Birkhoff sections, which we argue implies that they give rise to $n$ universally tight contact structures whose lifts to any finite cover are non-contactomorphic. This argument involves cylindrical contact homology together with the work of Barthelmé, Frankel, and Mann on the reconstruction of pseudo-Anosov flows from their closed orbits. These results answer more general versions of questions posed by Calegari and by Min and Nonino.

math.GT↗

Floer homology and non-fibered knot detection

We prove for the first time that knot Floer homology and Khovanov homology can detect non-fibered knots, and that HOMFLY homology detects infinitely many such knots; these theories were previously known to detect a mere six knots, all fibered. These results rely on our main technical theorem, which gives a complete classification of genus-1 knots in the 3-sphere whose knot Floer homology in the top Alexander grading is 2-dimensional. We discuss applications of this classification to problems in Dehn surgery which are carried out in two sequels. These include a proof that $0$-surgery characterizes infinitely many knots, generalizing results of Gabai from his 1987 resolution of the Property R Conjecture.

math.GT↗

Floer homology and right-veering monodromy

We prove that the knot Floer complex of a fibered knot detects whether the monodromy of its fibration is right-veering. In particular, this leads to a purely knot Floer-theoretic characterization of tight contact structures, by the work of Honda, Kazez, and Matic. Our proof makes use of the relationship between the Heegaard Floer homology of mapping tori and the symplectic Floer homology of area-preserving surface diffeomorphisms. We describe applications of this work to Dehn surgeries and taut foliations.

math.GT↗

Framed instanton homology and concordance, II

We continue our study of the integer-valued knot invariants $ν^\sharp(K)$ and $r_0(K)$, which together determine the dimensions of the framed instanton homologies of all nonzero Dehn surgeries on $K$. We first establish a "conjugation" symmetry for the decomposition of cobordism maps constructed in our earlier work, and use this to prove, among many other things, that $ν^\sharp(K)$ is always either zero or odd. We then apply these technical results to study linear independence in the homology cobordism group, to define an instanton Floer analogue $ε^\sharp(K)$ of Hom's $ε$-invariant in Heegaard Floer homology, and to the problem of characterizing a given 3-manifold as Dehn surgery on a knot in $S^3$.

math.GT↗

Small Heegaard genus and SU(2)

Let $Y$ be a closed, orientable 3-manifold with Heegaard genus 2. We prove that if $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})$ has order $1$, $3$, or $5$, then there is a representation $π_1(Y) \to \mathrm{SU}(2)$ with non-abelian image. Similarly, if $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})$ has order $2$ then we find a non-abelian representation $π_1(Y) \to \mathrm{SO}(3)$. We also prove that a knot $K$ in $S^3$ is a trefoil if and only if there is a unique conjugacy class of irreducible representations $π_1(S^3\setminus K) \to \mathrm{SU}(2)$ sending a fixed meridian to $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}i&0\\0&-i\end{smallmatrix}\right)$.

math.GT↗

Characterizing slopes for $5_2$

We prove that all rational slopes are characterizing for the knot $5_2$, except possibly for positive integers. Along the way, we classify the Dehn surgeries on knots in $S^3$ that produce the Brieskorn sphere $Σ(2,3,11)$, and we study knots on which large integral surgeries are almost L-spaces.

math.GT↗

Zero-surgery characterizes infinitely many knots

We prove that 0 is a characterizing slope for infinitely many knots, namely the genus-1 knots whose knot Floer homology is 2-dimensional in the top Alexander grading, which we classified in recent work and which include all $(-3,3,2n+1)$ pretzel knots. This was previously only known for $5_2$ and its mirror, as a corollary of that classification, and for the unknot, trefoils, and the figure eight by work of Gabai from 1987.

math.GT↗

An instanton take on some knot detection results

We give new proofs that Khovanov homology detects the figure eight knot and the cinquefoils, and that HOMFLY homology detects $5_2$ and each of the $P(-3,3,2n+1)$ pretzel knots. For all but the figure eight these mostly follow the same lines as in previous work. The key difference is that in honor of Tom Mrowka's 60th birthday, the arguments here use instanton Floer homology rather than knot Floer homology.

math.GT↗

Instanton Floer homology of almost-rational plumbings

We show that if $Y$ is the boundary of an almost-rational plumbing, then the framed instanton Floer homology $\smash{I^\#(Y)}$ is isomorphic to the Heegaard Floer homology $\smash{\widehat{\mathit{HF}}(Y; \mathbb{C})}$. This class of 3-manifolds includes all Seifert fibered rational homology spheres with base orbifold $S^2$ (we establish the isomorphism for the remaining Seifert fibered rational homology spheres$\unicode{x2014}$with base $\mathbb{RP}^2$$\unicode{x2014}$directly). Our proof utilizes lattice homology, and relies on a decomposition theorem for instanton Floer cobordism maps recently established by Baldwin and Sivek.

math.GT↗

Instanton L-spaces and splicing

We prove that the 3-manifold obtained by gluing the complements of two nontrivial knots in homology 3-sphere instanton L-spaces, by a map which identifies meridians with Seifert longitudes, cannot be an instanton L-space. This recovers the recent theorem of Lidman, Pinzon-Caicedo, and Zentner that the fundamental group of every closed, oriented, toroidal 3-manifold admits a nontrivial SU(2)-representation, and consequently Zentner's earlier result that the fundamental group of every closed, oriented 3-manifold besides the 3-sphere admits a nontrivial SL(2,C)-representation.

math.GT↗

Khovanov homology and the cinquefoil

We prove that Khovanov homology with coefficients in $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ detects the $(2,5)$ torus knot. Our proof makes use of a wide range of deep tools in Floer homology, Khovanov homology, and Khovanov homotopy. We combine these tools with classical results on the dynamics of surface homeomorphisms to reduce the detection question to a problem about mutually braided unknots, which we then solve with computer assistance.

math.GT↗

Small Dehn surgery and SU(2)

We prove that the fundamental group of 3-surgery on a nontrivial knot in the 3-sphere always admits an irreducible SU(2)-representation. This answers a question of Kronheimer and Mrowka dating from their work on the Property P conjecture. An important ingredient in our proof is a relationship between instanton Floer homology and the symplectic Floer homology of genus-2 surface diffeomorphisms, due to Ivan Smith. We use similar arguments at the end to extend our main result to infinitely many surgery slopes in the interval [3,5).

math.GT↗

Framed instanton homology and concordance

We define two concordance invariants of knots using framed instanton homology. These invariants $ν^\sharp$ and $τ^\sharp$ provide bounds on slice genus and maximum self-linking number, and the latter is a concordance homomorphism which agrees in all known cases with the $τ$ invariant in Heegaard Floer homology. We use $ν^\sharp$ and $τ^\sharp$ to compute the framed instanton homology of all nonzero rational Dehn surgeries on: 20 of the 35 nontrivial prime knots through 8 crossings, infinite families of twist and pretzel knots, and instanton L-space knots; and of 19 of the first 20 closed hyperbolic manifolds in the Hodgson--Weeks census. In another application, we determine when the cable of a knot is an instanton L-space knot. Finally, we discuss applications to the spectral sequence from odd Khovanov homology to the framed instanton homology of branched double covers, and to the behaviors of $τ^\sharp$ and $τ$ under genus-2 mutation.

math.GT↗

Khovanov homology and knot Floer homology for pointed links

A well-known conjecture states that for any $l$-component link $L$ in $S^3$, the rank of the knot Floer homology of $L$ (over any field) is less than or equal to $2^{l-1}$ times the rank of the reduced Khovanov homology of $L$. In this paper, we describe a framework that might be used to prove this conjecture. We construct a modified version of Khovanov homology for links with multiple basepoints and show that it mimics the behavior of knot Floer homology. We also introduce a new spectral sequence converging to knot Floer homology whose $E_1$ page is conjecturally isomorphic to our new version of Khovanov homology; this would prove that the conjecture stated above holds over the field $\mathbb{Z}_2$.

math.GT↗