arXiv subjects

John Burtenshaw

Publications and source records attributed to John Burtenshaw.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Augmenting PID Control with Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Hybrid Approach to the Industrial Benchmark

As industrial processes grow in complexity, traditional Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers are often insufficient for handling their non-linear, multi-input dynamics. We propose using advanced Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to prove its advantages in these complex environments. To do this, we rely on the Industrial Benchmark (IB). The IB is a realistic simulation that tests DRL algorithms against the key challenges of industrial applications: high-dimensional state spaces, delayed effects, and conflicting multi-criterial objectives. This testbed highlights DRL's core trade-off: while its final policies can often be unstable, its unique strength is the ability to autonomously discover optimal, non-obvious policies in multi-dimensional spaces where simple controllers fail. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid PID-RL controller that leverages DRL's discovery capability while ensuring Reliability. After developing a multi-objective reward function to make DRL viable, we use a twin-delayed deep deterministic (TD3) agent as a discovery tool to find the optimal, non-obvious settings for the IB's 'Gain' and 'Shift' parameters. By feeding these discovered parameters to a simple, tuned PID controller, our hybrid model successfully combines all three characteristics: it achieves the optimal Performance and Efficiency of the best DRL agent with the Reliability of a classical controller. This work demonstrates a practical methodology for using DRL to augment, rather than replace, trusted industrial control systems.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Benchmarking Hybrid Deep Learning Architectures for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0

Predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0 refers to using data from sensors, machines, and production systems to estimate when equipment is likely to fail, so maintenance can be planned before a breakdown occurs [1]. However, a model that predicts maintenance may work perfectly in the lab but fail unexpectedly when applied to real factory data [2]. To solve this "reliability" gap, we evaluated six deep learning architectures across more than 700 experimental runs. We focused on the two dominant approaches in the field: Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), which process data step-by-step, like reading a sentence [3], and Transformers, a recent dominant approach, which look at the entire sequence at once to spot important connections [4]. We examined whether Transformers still outperform recurrent neural networks (RNNs) when the data includes noise [5]. We found that while Transformers excelled at tracking stable, slow-moving processes, they tend to overreact to chaotic data, mistakenly taking sensor noise for meaningful signals [6]. We also found that the hybrid method that combines a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) layer with a Transformer layer is more resilient to noisy data from factory shops [7]. Functioning as a noise filter, the LSTM smooths out data volatility, allowing the Transformer to focus on the bigger picture without being distracted [8]. The hybrid model did not just improve accuracy; it proved to be significantly more consistent than complex models, delivering reliable predictions regardless of how chaotic the underlying system became.

cs.LG↗