arXiv subjects

John Wittnebel

Publications and source records attributed to John Wittnebel.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

Large Matchings in Maximal 1-planar graphs

It is well-known that every maximal planar graph has a matching of size at least $\tfrac{n+8}{3}$ if $n\geq 14$. In this paper, we investigate similar matching-bounds for maximal \emph{1-planar} graphs, i.e., graphs that can be drawn such that every edge has at most one crossing. In particular we show that every 3-connected simple-maximal 1-planar graph has a matching of size at least $\tfrac{2n+6}{5}$; the bound decreases to $\tfrac{3n+14}{10}$ if the graph need not be 3-connected. We also give (weaker) bounds when the graph comes with a fixed 1-planar drawing or is not simple. All our bounds are tight in the sense that some graph that satisfies the restrictions has no bigger matching.

math.CO↗

arXiv2020

Matchings in 1-planar graphs with large minimum degree

In 1979, Nishizeki and Baybars showed that every planar graph with minimum degree 3 has a matching of size $\frac{n}{3}+c$ (where the constant $c$ depends on the connectivity), and even better bounds hold for planar graphs with minimum degree 4 and 5. In this paper, we investigate similar matching-bounds for {\em 1-planar} graphs, i.e., graphs that can be drawn such that every edge has at most one crossing. We show that every 1-planar graph with minimum degree 3 has a matching of size at least $\frac{1}{7}n+\frac{12}{7}$, and this is tight for some graphs. We provide similar bounds for 1-planar graphs with minimum degree 4 and 5, while the case of minimum degree 6 and 7 remains open.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2018

Syntactic complexity of bifix-free languages

We study the properties of syntactic monoids of bifix-free regular languages. In particular, we solve an open problem concerning syntactic complexity: We prove that the cardinality of the syntactic semigroup of a bifix-free language with state complexity $n$ is at most $(n-1)^{n-3}+(n-2)^{n-3}+(n-3)2^{n-3}$ for $n\ge 6$. The main proof uses a large construction with the method of injective function. Since this bound is known to be reachable, and the values for $n \le 5$ are known, this completely settles the problem. We also prove that $(n-2)^{n-3} + (n-3)2^{n-3} - 1$ is the minimal size of the alphabet required to meet the bound for $n \ge 6$. Finally, we show that the largest transition semigroups of minimal DFAs which recognize bifix-free languages are unique up to renaming the states.

cs.FL↗