arXiv subjects

Jon André Ottesen

Publications and source records attributed to Jon André Ottesen.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Forecasting Brain Tracer Distribution from Pre-Contrast MRI: A Comparison of Direct Regression and Flow Matching

Intrathecal contrast-enhanced MRI shows how a tracer injected into the cerebrospinal fluid spreads through the brain, but requires repeated scans over 24--48\,h. We therefore ask how much of the later tracer distribution can be predicted from the pre-contrast scan and elapsed time alone. Using 104 training patients (878 MRI volumes), we compared a direct image-to-image regression model with a more complex generative model based on conditional flow matching, and tested both on 23 held-out patients and on 51 patients from a separate cohort with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH). The direct model reduced the error of simply copying the pre-contrast scan by about 60\% in held-out patients and 25\% in the INPH cohort, and its predicted change maps agreed with the observed tracer enhancement rather than only reproducing anatomy. The generative model was less accurate in both cohorts. A substantial part of the later tracer distribution is therefore predictable from the patient's brain anatomy as seen on pre-contrast MRI, and the added model complexity gave no benefit at this data scale. With prospective validation, such forecasts could be studied for patient stratification and treatment planning in intrathecal therapies.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2026

Deep Learning Segmentation of Diffusion-Weighted MRI Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Pragmatic Evaluation Across Three Datasets

Objective: Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) is the gold standard for visualizing and quantifying acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Although deep learning methods can accurately segment AIS lesions, the optimal image inputs and model architecture remain uncertain. We evaluated whether accurate AIS lesion segmentation can be achieved using a pragmatic deep learning approach with minimal preprocessing and clinically feasible inference times. Materials and Methods: Self-configured nnU-Net models were trained on 1,744 DWI cases from local, national, and open-access datasets and tested on 436 cases. Four experimental conditions were evaluated using five-fold cross-validation: with or without brain extraction and using either DWI alone or DWI plus apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images as inputs. Two architectures were compared: the baseline nnU-Net (base) and a residual encoder nnU-Net (ResEnc). Performance was benchmarked against the DeepISLES ensemble model from the 2022 ISLES challenge. Results: In the test set (n=436), the base model achieved a median (IQR) Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.84 (0.19). For the base model, only two of six pairwise comparisons between input configurations showed significant differences. ResEnc produced small but significant improvements in DSC compared with the base model for DWI, DWI+brain extraction, and DWI+ADC inputs (all p<0.02), but not for DWI+ADC+brain extraction (p>0.50). The base model significantly outperformed DeepISLES, particularly in patients with smaller infarct volumes (signed-rank test, p<0.01). Conclusions: A baseline nnU-Net trained on DWI alone, without preprocessing, enabled fast and accurate AIS lesion segmentation. This streamlined approach may facilitate clinical research and support acute stroke imaging workflows

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Adaptive Post-Processing Drives Instance-Level Detection in Stroke Lesion Segmentation

Instance-level lesion detection has been an increasingly larger focal point in medical image segmentation besides the more standard voxel-level overlap. Still, most pipelines are trained and post-processed for voxel overlap alone. In particular, the mismatch is most pronounced for small lesions, where a near-miss prediction---substantial overlap that falls just short of the instance-matching threshold---scores the same as a complete miss. In our ISLES'26 submission, we found that closing this gap mattered far more in post-processing than in architecture design. Our Volume-Conditioned Adaptive Post-Processing (VCAP) scheme adjusts component-size thresholds to each case's predicted lesion burden, improving Lesion-F1 by 0.032 (unbiased cross-fold estimate)---approximately 6 times larger than any architectural change we tested. A resolution-aware attention architecture (Viola2Plus), designed for small-lesion segmentation, shows why the distinction matters: it left small-lesion Dice unchanged but raised small-lesion detection rate by 3.7\%, a real effect voxel-overlap metrics alone would have missed. Under 5-fold cross-validation on the 1,453-case training set, our post-processed two-architecture ensemble achieves Dice 0.651 and Lesion-F1 0.614, versus 0.644 and 0.573 for the unprocessed single-model baseline.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Random Partitioning: Unsupervised Spatio-Temporal Stratification for Cohort Balancing in Longitudinal Medical Imaging

Rigorous dataset partitioning is a foundational, yet frequently overlooked, prerequisite for reliable deep learning in longitudinal medical imaging. Naively shuffling small clinical cohorts routinely introduces covariate shifts and temporal sampling imbalances across training, validation, and test subsets, exposing downstream models to out-of-distribution evaluation. We address this vulnerability with an auditable Tripartite Dataset Analytics Framework that systematically characterizes spatial grid integrity, multi-parametric intensity fingerprints, and longitudinal temporal trajectories, quantifying the heavy-tailed feature dispersion and irregular, episodic sampling intervals typical of real-world clinical cohorts. Building on this characterization, we formalize an unsupervised spatio-temporal cohort-balancing standard operating procedure (SOP) that combines elbow-optimized K-means clustering over a standardized, six-dimensional joint intensity-temporal feature space with intra-cluster proportionate stratified sampling. On a longitudinal, contrast-enhanced $T1$-weighted brain MRI cohort (N=149), the protocol reduces the maximum cross-subset intensity bias from 34.1% under conventional random shuffling to under 2.1%, while aligning longitudinal follow-up intervals closely around the population mean. Monte Carlo stress testing across ten random seeds and three split configurations confirms that this alignment remains tightly bounded, in clear contrast to the substantial variability of random partitioning. The resulting protocol offers a reproducible, generalizable procedure for cohort engineering in variable-length longitudinal clinical imaging workflows.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2024

Deep Learning-based Intraoperative MRI Reconstruction

Purpose: To evaluate the quality of deep learning reconstruction for prospectively accelerated intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) during resective brain tumor surgery. Materials and Methods: Accelerated iMRI was performed during brain surgery using dual surface coils positioned around the area of resection. A deep learning (DL) model was trained on the fastMRI neuro dataset to mimic the data from the iMRI protocol. Evaluation was performed on imaging material from 40 patients imaged between 01.11.2021 - 01.06.2023 that underwent iMRI during tumor resection surgery. A comparative analysis was conducted between the conventional compressed sense (CS) method and the trained DL reconstruction method. Blinded evaluation of multiple image quality metrics was performed by two working neuro-radiologists and a working neurosurgeon on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (1=non diagnostic, 2=poor, 3=acceptable, 4=good, 5=excellent), and the favored reconstruction variant. Results: The DL reconstruction was strongly favored or favored over the CS reconstruction for 33/40, 39/40, and 8/40 of cases for reader 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Two of three readers consistently assigned higher ratings for the DL reconstructions, and the DL reconstructions had a higher score than their respective CS counterparts for 72%, 72%, and 14% of the cases for reader 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Still, the DL reconstructions exhibited shortcomings such as a striping artifact and reduced signal. Conclusion: DL shows promise to allow for high-quality reconstructions of intraoperative MRI with equal to or improved perceived spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, diagnostic confidence, diagnostic conspicuity, and spatial resolution compared to compressed sense.

eess.IV↗