SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Jonas Bauer

Publications and source records attributed to Jonas Bauer.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Time-dependent structural equation modeling of fans' football fever using activity tracking data during the 2025 DFB Cup final

Football fans frequently exhibit pronounced emotional and physiological reactions during high-stakes matches. However, the temporal dynamics of this football fever are rarely modeled as a latent process. Using intensive longitudinal data from Arminia Bielefeld supporters who wore smartwatches during the 2025 German Football Association (DFB) Cup final, we investigate how football fever unfolds. The devices recorded heart rate, stress level, and related indicators in short intervals, allowing us to construct a latent variable for football fever and model its dynamics. We specify a time-dependent structural equation model with latent growth components and autoregressive effects to capture both overall trends and short-term carry-over effects in fans' physiological responses. Results are aggregated across multiple imputations of missing measurements. Model fit is evaluated using adjustments for the high data dimensionality. The results show that football fever follows a V-shaped trajectory: high at kick-off, followed by a steady decline until the renewed arousal in the second half, with substantial between-fan heterogeneity in both baseline level and temporal dynamics. Our findings demonstrate that football fever can be adequately represented as a latent variable using structural equation modeling and reflected by wearable technology data. This highlights the importance of accounting for temporal dependence when studying dynamic emotional phenomena, e. g., in sports spectatorship.

stat.AP

Measuring football fever through wearable technology: A case study on the German cup final

Football is the world's most popular sport, evoking strong physiological and emotional responses among its fans. Yet, the specific dynamics of fan attachment to matches have received little attention in the literature. In this paper, we quantify these dynamics through a unique case study from professional football: the 2025 cup final of the German Football Association (DFB) between first-division club VfB Stuttgart and third-division club Arminia Bielefeld. We collected high-resolution smartwatch data, including heart rate and stress level, from 229 Arminia Bielefeld fans over approximately 12 weeks, complemented by survey responses on club attachment, match attendance, and personal characteristics from a subset of 37 participants. By combining physiological data with survey information, we analyse variations in emotional engagement across individuals and contexts, as well as physiological reactions to key match events. This approach provides rare, data-driven insights into the football fever that captivates fans during high-stakes competitions. Furthermore, we compare the vital parameters recorded on the day of the match with baseline levels on non-matchdays throughout the entire observation period. Our findings reveal pronounced physiological responses among fans, beginning hours before the match and peaking at kick-off.

stat.AP

Misspecifications in structural equation modeling: The choice of latent variables, causal-formative constructs or composites

Empirical research in many social disciplines involves constructs that are not directly observable, such as behaviors. To model them, constructs must be operationalized using their relations with indicators. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is the primary approach for this purpose. In SEM, three types of constructs are distinguished: latent variables, causal-formative constructs, and composites. To estimate the parameters of the different models, various estimators have been developed. Many Monte Carlo studies have examined the estimation performances of different estimators for the construct types. One aspect evaluated is the consequences of construct misspecification - when the true construct type differs from the modeling choice - on parameter estimates and model fit. For example, parameter bias in models that misspecify latent variables as composites is often attributed to the chosen estimator, although model parameters depend on different estimators, making it impossible to examine the factors individually. This article aims to disentangle the issues of construct misspecification and parameter estimation by a comprehensive Monte Carlo study of all combinations between true and assumed construct types. To focus on misspecification, we used the same estimator for all models, namely the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator. To generalize beyond ML, we replicated the simulation using another estimator. We aim to examine the role of construct misspecification, not estimator choice, on the estimation performance and show that misspecification leads indeed to biased path coefficient estimates. Further, we evaluate whether fit measures can distinguish models with correct from those with misspecified constructs. We find that none of the criteria considered is suited for this. These findings stress the importance of thoughtful construct specification and the need for further research.

stat.ME