arXiv subjects

Jonas R. Naujoks

Publications and source records attributed to Jonas R. Naujoks.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

PINNfluence: Interpreting PINNs through Influence Functions

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful deep learning approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) in the physical sciences, yet their behavior remains largely opaque and is typically understood through failure mode analyses rather than explicit interpretability. To address this issue, we introduce PINNfluence, a training data attribution framework for interpreting PINNs based on influence functions. By extending influence functions to composite physics-informed training objectives, we enable fine-grained attribution between predictions, loss components, and training data points. Through benchmark experiments across various PDEs, we demonstrate that influence patterns provide granular diagnostics that distinguish structural characteristics across well-trained and poorly-trained PINNs. PINNfluence thus opens a new avenue for understanding and improving the reliability of PINNs through the lens of their data.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Leveraging Influence Functions for Resampling Data in Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) offer a powerful approach to solving partial differential equations (PDEs), which are ubiquitous in the quantitative sciences. Applied to both forward and inverse problems across various scientific domains, PINNs have recently emerged as a valuable tool in the field of scientific machine learning. A key aspect of their training is that the data -- spatio-temporal points sampled from the PDE's input domain -- are readily available. Influence functions, a tool from the field of explainable AI (XAI), approximate the effect of individual training points on the model, enhancing interpretability. In the present work, we explore the application of influence function-based sampling approaches for the training data. Our results indicate that such targeted resampling based on data attribution methods has the potential to enhance prediction accuracy in physics-informed neural networks, demonstrating a practical application of an XAI method in PINN training.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Opportunities and limitations of explaining quantum machine learning

A common trait of many machine learning models is that it is often difficult to understand and explain what caused the model to produce the given output. While the explainability of neural networks has been an active field of research in the last years, comparably little is known for quantum machine learning models. Despite a few recent works analyzing some specific aspects of explainability, as of now there is no clear big picture perspective as to what can be expected from quantum learning models in terms of explainability. In this work, we address this issue by identifying promising research avenues in this direction and lining out the expected future results. We additionally propose two explanation methods designed specifically for quantum machine learning models, as first of their kind to the best of our knowledge. Next to our pre-view of the field, we compare both existing and novel methods to explain the predictions of quantum learning models. By studying explainability in quantum machine learning, we can contribute to the sustainable development of the field, preventing trust issues in the future.

quant-ph↗