arXiv subjects

Jonathan von Rad

Publications and source records attributed to Jonathan von Rad.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

PolyFact: Comparing Consistency-Driven Post-training Methods for Cross-Lingual Factual Recall

Large language models (LLMs) trained predominantly on English data encode substantial world knowledge, yet often fail to express it reliably in other languages, a phenomenon known as cross-lingual factual inconsistency. To study this, we introduce PolyFact, a fully parallel multilingual factual QA dataset of 60K Wikidata-grounded facts across 12 typologically diverse languages, and propose consistency-driven GRPO with cross-lingual reward pooling. We compare our method against supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and the consistency-enhancement baselines DCO and CM-Align on OLMo-2-1124-7B and Qwen-2.5-7B, and analyze whether light continual pretraining (CPT) on parallel data provides a useful foundation for post-training. No single method dominates: SFT maximises in-distribution accuracy but not consistency, DCO yields the strongest consistency gains but fails to transfer to free-form generation, and our GRPO variant achieves the strongest transfer to free-form recall and unseen languages on the multilingual base model. CPT mildly aids monolingual models but harms multilingual ones. Mechanistic analyses suggest that GRPO is associated with reduced language specialization, consistent with greater sharing of representations across languages. We release our code, models, and dataset publicly.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

UniComp: A Unified Evaluation of Large Language Model Compression via Pruning, Quantization, and Distillation

Model compression is increasingly essential for deploying large language models (LLMs), yet existing comparative studies largely focus on pruning and quantization evaluated primarily on knowledge-centric benchmarks. Thus, we introduce UniComp, a unified evaluation framework for comparing pruning, quantization, and knowledge distillation. UniComp evaluates compressed models along three dimensions: performance, reliability, and efficiency, using a diverse set of capability- and safety-oriented benchmarks together with a hardware-aware efficiency analysis. Through evaluation of seven compression techniques across over 40 datasets, we observe (i) a consistent knowledge bias, where factual recall is largely preserved while multi-step reasoning, multilingual, and instruction-following capabilities degrade; (ii) a deployment-critical performance-reliability decoupling, where retained performance does not indicate preserved safety, fairness and privacy; and (iii) that task-specific calibration can yield up to 50% relative improvement in reasoning performance in pruned models.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Investigating the Effect of Network Pruning on Performance and Interpretability

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are often over-parameterized for their tasks and can be compressed quite drastically by removing weights, a process called pruning. We investigate the impact of different pruning techniques on the classification performance and interpretability of GoogLeNet. We systematically apply unstructured and structured pruning, as well as connection sparsity (pruning of input weights) methods to the network and analyze the outcomes regarding the network's performance on the validation set of ImageNet. We also compare different retraining strategies, such as iterative pruning and one-shot pruning. We find that with sufficient retraining epochs, the performance of the networks can approximate the performance of the default GoogLeNet - and even surpass it in some cases. To assess interpretability, we employ the Mechanistic Interpretability Score (MIS) developed by Zimmermann et al. . Our experiments reveal that there is no significant relationship between interpretability and pruning rate when using MIS as a measure. Additionally, we observe that networks with extremely low accuracy can still achieve high MIS scores, suggesting that the MIS may not always align with intuitive notions of interpretability, such as understanding the basis of correct decisions.

cs.LG↗