SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Jonathn Chang

Publications and source records attributed to Jonathn Chang.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PLOT: Progressive Localization via Optimal Transport in Neural Causal Abstraction

Causal abstraction offers a principled framework for mechanistic interpretability, aligning a high-level causal model with the low-level computation realized by a neural network through counterfactual intervention analysis. Existing methods such as distributed alignment search (DAS) learn expressive subspace interventions, but the relevant neural site is unknown a priori, so finding a handle requires a computationally burdensome search over candidate sites. We introduce PLOT (Progressive Localization via Optimal Transport), a transport-based framework that localizes causal variables from the output effect geometry of abstract and neural interventions. PLOT fits an optimal transport coupling between abstract variables and candidate neural sites, yielding a global soft correspondence that can be calibrated into intervention handles. In simple settings, a single coupling over individual neurons suffices. In larger models, PLOT is applied progressively, moving from coarse sites such as tokens, timesteps, or layers to finer supports such as coordinate groups or PCA spans, and optionally guiding DAS based on the localized signal. Across experiments of increasing complexity, transport-only PLOT handles are exceedingly fast and competitive on accuracy, while PLOT-guided DAS reaches DAS-level accuracy at a fraction of full DAS runtime, providing an efficient localization engine for causal abstraction research at scale.

cs.LG

EigenBench: A Comparative Behavioral Measure of Value Alignment

Aligning AI with human values is a pressing unsolved problem. To address the lack of quantitative metrics for value alignment, we propose EigenBench: a black-box method for comparatively benchmarking language models' values. Given an ensemble of models, a constitution describing a value system, and a dataset of scenarios, our method returns a vector of scores quantifying each model's alignment to the given constitution. To produce these scores, each model judges the outputs of other models across many scenarios, and these judgments are aggregated with EigenTrust (Kamvar et al., 2003), yielding scores that reflect a weighted consensus judgment of the whole ensemble. EigenBench uses no ground truth labels, as it is designed to quantify subjective traits for which reasonable judges may disagree on the correct label. Hence, to validate our method, we collect human judgments on the same ensemble of models and show that EigenBench's judgments align closely with those of human evaluators. We further demonstrate that EigenBench can recover model rankings on the GPQA benchmark without access to objective labels, supporting its viability as a framework for evaluating subjective values for which no ground truths exist. The code is available at https://github.com/jchang153/EigenBench.

cs.AI

Hate speech and hate crimes: a data-driven study of evolving discourse around marginalized groups

This study explores the dynamic relationship between online discourse, as observed in tweets, and physical hate crimes, focusing on marginalized groups. Leveraging natural language processing techniques, including keyword extraction and topic modeling, we analyze the evolution of online discourse after events affecting these groups. Examining sentiment and polarizing tweets, we establish correlations with hate crimes in Black and LGBTQ+ communities. Using a knowledge graph, we connect tweets, users, topics, and hate crimes, enabling network analyses. Our findings reveal divergent patterns in the evolution of user communities for Black and LGBTQ+ groups, with notable differences in sentiment among influential users. This analysis sheds light on distinctive online discourse patterns and emphasizes the need to monitor hate speech to prevent hate crimes, especially following significant events impacting marginalized communities.

cs.SI