Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Jordan Docter

Publications and source records attributed to Jordan Docter.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Planted Cliques and Quantum Symmetry-Adapted Measurements

We study how quantum encodings and symmetry-adapted measurements preserve information for planted-clique detection from one classical graph. For $k=\lfloor n^{1/2-\varepsilon}\rfloor$, with fixed $0<\varepsilon<1/2$, detection is statistically possible but conjectured hard for polynomial-time classical algorithms. For a compact binary phase encoding, we prove that constant-advantage detection requires $Ω(n^{1+2\varepsilon}\ln^2 n)$ copies of the phase state of the same graph, even under arbitrary joint measurements. In the large-copy limit, the optimal decision rule thresholds the total number of $k$-cliques in the graph and its complement, but this characterization provides no efficient detector. We therefore explore measurements guided by the symmetries of the input distributions, starting with the efficient Schur transform on the full graph register. We show that weak Schur sampling, which measures only the representation label, depends only on edge count and has vanishing distinguishing power in this regime. When the label and multiplicity registers are discarded, the remaining quantum states are almost perfectly distinguishable. We show that the support of the planted state occupies only a vanishing fraction of the graph Hilbert space. Any subspace containing it still permits near-perfect detection if its relative dimension also vanishes. This gives us freedom to choose a subspace that is easier to measure. We propose exploring subgroup isotypic measurements to find such subspaces. Whether they can yield an efficient detector remains open. Finally, we show that a single supplied coherent quantum sample permits efficient detection, yielding a conditional computational separation from one classical sample under quantum planted-clique hardness.

quant-ph↗

A Separation Between Types of Quantum Oracle Separations

Recent works have demonstrated that quantum oracles have subtle behavior, as access to inverse, conjugate or controlled queries can exponentially change the query complexity of certain tasks. Inspired by these works, we introduce the notion of meta-complexity of quantum relativization. We ask: for any two quantum complexity classes, under which "types" of quantum oracles are they equal or separated? Different pantheons of oracles (or quantum oracle types, e.g. unitary vs state, poly- vs superpoly-dimensional, closed under inverse or not) form a partially ordered set based on their power in separating complexity classes. Moreover, two oracle pantheons A and B are separated if there exists a pair of complexity classes that are separated under an oracle from pantheon A but yet the complexity classes are equivalent under all oracles from pantheon B. We show that this meta-complexity can be nontrivial by giving a complete classification, within the family of oracle pantheons defined in this paper, of which models can separate the complexity classes $\mathsf{PostBQP}$ and $\mathsf{PreciseBQP}$, the exponentially precise variant of $\mathsf{BQP}$. Both classes equal $\mathsf{PP}$ in the unrelativized setting. Within our taxonomy, they remain equal relative to real or polynomial-dimensional unitary oracles and whenever inverse or conjugate access is supplied. In contrast, we give a separation relative to forward-only complex diagonal unitaries of superpolynomial dimension, as well as a separation relative to single-qubit state-preparation oracles. We view this as a test case for the meta-complexity of oracles which underscores the subtlety inherent to the relativization of quantum complexity classes.

quant-ph↗

Quantum Speedups Require Structure or Depth

One of the most basic conjectures in quantum complexity theory states that every $t$-query quantum algorithm can be simulated on most inputs by a $\mathrm{poly}(t)$-query classical algorithm. If true, this would provide broad justification for the need for structure in quantum speedups. We settle this conjecture for parallel quantum algorithms, showing that every $t$-query $d$-round quantum algorithm can be simulated on most inputs with $t^{O(d^2)}$ classical queries. This suggests that for unstructured problems, superpolynomial speedups would require quantum circuits of superconstant depth, and exponential speedups would further require polynomial depth. In contrast, most known speedups for structured problems are achieved by highly parallel, low-depth algorithms. Our techniques also carry new implications for the status of $\mathsf{BPP}$ vs. $\mathsf{BQP}$ relative to a random oracle, a similarly longstanding problem.

quant-ph↗

Efficient Unitary T-designs from Random Sums

Unitary $T$-designs play an important role in quantum information, with diverse applications in quantum algorithms, benchmarking, tomography, and communication. Until now, the most efficient construction of unitary $T$-designs for $n$-qudit systems has been via random local quantum circuits, which have been shown to converge to approximate $T$-designs in the diamond norm using $O(T^{5+o(1)} n^2)$ quantum gates. In this work, we provide a new construction of $T$-designs via random matrix theory using $\tilde{O}(T^2 n^2)$ quantum gates. Our construction leverages two key ideas. First, in the spirit of central limit theorems, we approximate the Gaussian Unitary Ensemble (GUE) by an i.i.d. sum of random Hermitian matrices. Second, we show that the product of just two exponentiated GUE matrices is already approximately Haar random. Thus, multiplying two exponentiated sums over rather simple random matrices yields a unitary $T$-design, via Hamiltonian simulation. A central feature of our proof is a new connection between the polynomial method in quantum query complexity and the large-dimension ($N$) expansion in random matrix theory. In particular, we show that the polynomial method provides exponentially improved bounds on the high moments of certain random matrix ensembles, without requiring intricate Weingarten calculations. In doing so, we define and solve a new type of moment problem on the unit circle, asking whether a finite number of equally weighted points, corresponding to eigenvalues of unitary matrices, can reproduce a given set of moments.

quant-ph↗