arXiv subjects

José María Sigarreta Almira

Publications and source records attributed to José María Sigarreta Almira.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

Reducing Dominating Sets in Graphs

A dominating set of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a subset of vertices $S\subseteq V$ such that every vertex $v\in V\setminus S$ has at least one neighbor in set $S$. The corresponding optimization problem is known to be NP-hard. The best known polynomial time approximation algorithm for the problem separates the solution process in two stages applying first a fast greedy algorithm to obtain an initial dominating set, and then it uses an iterative procedure to reduce (purify) this dominating set. The purification stage turned out to be practically efficient. Here we further strengthen the purification stage presenting four new purification algorithms. All four purification procedures outperform the earlier purification procedure. The algorithms were tested for over 1300 benchmark problem instances. Compared to the known upper bounds, the obtained solutions were about 7 times better. Remarkably, for the 500 benchmark instances for which the optimum is known, the optimal solutions were obtained for 46.33\% of the tested instances, whereas the average error for the remaining instances was about 1.01.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2023

Exact and Heuristic Algorithms for the Domination Problem

In a simple connected graph $G=(V,E)$, a subset of vertices $S \subseteq V$ is a dominating set if any vertex $v \in V\setminus S$ is adjacent to some vertex $x$ from this subset. A number of real-life problems can be modeled using this problem which is known to be among the difficult NP-hard problems in its class. We formulate the problem as an integer liner program (ILP) and compare the performance with the two earlier existing exact state-of-the-art algorithms and exact implicit enumeration and heuristic algorithms that we propose here. Our exact algorithm was able to find optimal solutions much faster than ILP and the above two exact algorithms for middle-dense instances. For graphs with a considerable size, our heuristic algorithm was much faster than both, ILP and our exact algorithm. It found an optimal solution for more than half of the tested instances, whereas it improved the earlier known state-of-the-art solutions for almost all the tested benchmark instances. Among the instances where the optimum was not found, it gave an average approximation error of $1.18$.

cs.DS↗