arXiv subjects

José R. Zubizarreta

Publications and source records attributed to José R. Zubizarreta.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Adaptive Orthogonalization for Stable Estimation of the Effects of Time-Varying Treatments

Inferring the causal effects of time-varying treatments is often hindered by highly variable inverse propensity weights, particularly in settings with limited covariate overlap. Building on the key framework of Imai and Ratkovic (2015), we establish sufficient balancing conditions for identification in longitudinal studies of treatment effects and propose a novel estimator that directly targets features of counterfactual or potential covariates. Instead of balancing observed covariates, our method balances the components of covariates that are orthogonal to their history, thereby isolating the new information at each time point. This strategy directly targets the joint distribution of potential covariates and prioritizes features that are most relevant to the outcome. We prove that the resulting estimator for the mean potential outcome is consistent and asymptotically normal, even in settings where standard inverse propensity weighting fails. Extensive simulations show that our estimator attains efficiency comparable to that of g-computation while providing superior robustness to model misspecification. We apply our method to a longitudinal study of private versus public schooling in Chile, demonstrating its stability and interpretability in estimating their effects on university admission scores.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

On the Use of Weighting for Personalized and Transparent Evidence Synthesis

Over the past few decades, statistical methods for causal inference have made impressive strides, enabling progress across a range of scientific fields. However, much of this methodological development has been confined to individual studies, limiting its ability to draw more generalizable conclusions. Achieving a thorough understanding of cause and effect typically relies on the integration, reconciliation, and synthesis from diverse study designs and multiple data sources. Furthermore, it is crucial to direct this synthesis effort toward understanding the effect of treatments for specific patient populations. To address these challenges, we present a weighting framework for evidence synthesis that handles both individual- and aggregate-level data, encompassing and extending conventional regression-based meta-analysis methods. We use this approach to tailor meta-analyses, targeting the covariate profiles of patients in a target population in a sample-bounded manner, thereby enhancing their personalization and robustness. We propose a technique to detect studies that meaningfully deviate from the target population, suggesting when it might be prudent to exclude them from the analysis. We establish multiple consistency conditions and demonstrate asymptotic normality for the proposed estimator. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method through a simulation study and two real-world case studies.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Counterfactual Mean-variance Optimization

We study a counterfactual mean-variance optimization, where the mean and variance are defined as functionals of counterfactual distributions. The optimization problem defines the optimal resource allocation under various constraints in a hypothetical scenario induced by a specified intervention, which may differ substantially from the observed world. We propose a doubly robust-style estimator for the optimal solution to the counterfactual mean-variance optimization problem and derive a closed-form expression for its asymptotic distribution. Our analysis shows that the proposed estimator attains fast parametric convergence rates while enabling tractable inference, even when incorporating nonparametric methods. We further address the calibration of the counterfactual covariance estimator to enhance the finite-sample performance of the proposed optimal solution estimators. Finally, we evaluate the proposed methods through simulation studies and demonstrate their applicability in real-world problems involving healthcare policy and financial portfolio construction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Fair and Robust Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for Policy Learning

We propose a simple and general framework for nonparametric estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects under fairness constraints. Under standard regularity conditions, we show that the resulting estimators possess the double robustness property. We use this framework to characterize the trade-off between fairness and the maximum welfare achievable by the optimal policy. We evaluate the methods in a simulation study and illustrate them in a real-world case study.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Scalable kernel balancing weights in a nationwide observational study of hospital profit status and heart attack outcomes

Weighting is a general and often-used method for statistical adjustment. Weighting has two objectives: first, to balance covariate distributions, and second, to ensure that the weights have minimal dispersion and thus produce a more stable estimator. A recent, increasingly common approach directly optimizes the weights toward these two objectives. However, this approach has not yet been feasible in large-scale datasets when investigators wish to flexibly balance general basis functions in an extended feature space. For example, many balancing approaches cannot scale to national-level health services research studies. To address this practical problem, we describe a scalable and flexible approach to weighting that integrates a basis expansion in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space with state-of-the-art convex optimization techniques. Specifically, we use the rank-restricted Nyström method to efficiently compute a kernel basis for balancing in {nearly} linear time and space, and then use the specialized first-order alternating direction method of multipliers to rapidly find the optimal weights. In an extensive simulation study, we provide new insights into the performance of weighting estimators in large datasets, showing that the proposed approach substantially outperforms others in terms of accuracy and speed. Finally, we use this weighting approach to conduct a national study of the relationship between hospital profit status and heart attack outcomes in a comprehensive dataset of 1.27 million patients. We find that for-profit hospitals use interventional cardiology to treat heart attacks at similar rates as other hospitals, but have higher mortality and readmission rates.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Doubly Robust Counterfactual Classification

We study counterfactual classification as a new tool for decision-making under hypothetical (contrary to fact) scenarios. We propose a doubly-robust nonparametric estimator for a general counterfactual classifier, where we can incorporate flexible constraints by casting the classification problem as a nonlinear mathematical program involving counterfactuals. We go on to analyze the rates of convergence of the estimator and provide a closed-form expression for its asymptotic distribution. Our analysis shows that the proposed estimator is robust against nuisance model misspecification, and can attain fast $\sqrt{n}$ rates with tractable inference even when using nonparametric machine learning approaches. We study the empirical performance of our methods by simulation and apply them for recidivism risk prediction.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

The Balancing Act in Causal Inference

The idea of covariate balance is at the core of causal inference. Inverse propensity weights play a central role because they are the unique set of weights that balance the covariate distributions of different treatment groups. We discuss two broad approaches to estimating these weights: the more traditional one, which fits a propensity score model and then uses the reciprocal of the estimated propensity score to construct weights, and the balancing approach, which estimates the inverse propensity weights essentially by the method of moments, finding weights that achieve balance in the sample. We review ideas from the causal inference, sample surveys, and semiparametric estimation literatures, with particular attention to the role of balance as a sufficient condition for robust inference. We focus on the inverse propensity weighting and augmented inverse propensity weighting estimators for the average treatment effect given strong ignorability and consider generalizations for a broader class of problems including policy evaluation and the estimation of individualized treatment effects.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Large Sample Properties of Matching for Balance

Matching methods are widely used for causal inference in observational studies. Among them, nearest neighbor matching is arguably the most popular. However, nearest neighbor matching does not generally yield an average treatment effect estimator that is $\sqrt{n}$-consistent (Abadie and Imbens, 2006). Are matching methods not $\sqrt{n}$-consistent in general? In this paper, we study a recent class of matching methods that use integer programming to directly target aggregate covariate balance as opposed to finding close neighbor matches. We show that under suitable conditions these methods can yield simple estimators that are $\sqrt{n}$-consistent and asymptotically optimal.

math.ST↗

arXiv2019

Minimal Dispersion Approximately Balancing Weights: Asymptotic Properties and Practical Considerations

Weighting methods are widely used to adjust for covariates in observational studies, sample surveys, and regression settings. In this paper, we study a class of recently proposed weighting methods which find the weights of minimum dispersion that approximately balance the covariates. We call these weights "minimal weights" and study them under a common optimization framework. The key observation is the connection between approximate covariate balance and shrinkage estimation of the propensity score. This connection leads to both theoretical and practical developments. From a theoretical standpoint, we characterize the asymptotic properties of minimal weights and show that, under standard smoothness conditions on the propensity score function, minimal weights are consistent estimates of the true inverse probability weights. Also, we show that the resulting weighting estimator is consistent, asymptotically normal, and semiparametrically efficient. From a practical standpoint, we present a finite sample oracle inequality that bounds the loss incurred by balancing more functions of the covariates than strictly needed. This inequality shows that minimal weights implicitly bound the number of active covariate balance constraints. We finally provide a tuning algorithm for choosing the degree of approximate balance in minimal weights. We conclude the paper with four empirical studies that suggest approximate balance is preferable to exact balance, especially when there is limited overlap in covariate distributions. In these studies, we show that the root mean squared error of the weighting estimator can be reduced by as much as a half with approximate balance.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2016

Confidence intervals for means under constrained dependence

We develop a general framework for conducting inference on the mean of dependent random variables given constraints on their dependency graph. We establish the consistency of an oracle variance estimator of the mean when the dependency graph is known, along with an associated central limit theorem. We derive an integer linear program for finding an upper bound for the estimated variance when the graph is unknown, but topological and degree-based constraints are available. We develop alternative bounds, including a closed-form bound, under an additional homoskedasticity assumption. We establish a basis for Wald-type confidence intervals for the mean that are guaranteed to have asymptotically conservative coverage. We apply the approach to inference from a social network link-tracing study and provide statistical software implementing the approach.

math.ST↗

arXiv2015

Isolation in the construction of natural experiments

A natural experiment is a type of observational study in which treatment assignment, though not randomized by the investigator, is plausibly close to random. A process that assigns treatments in a highly nonrandom, inequitable manner may, in rare and brief moments, assign aspects of treatments at random or nearly so. Isolating those moments and aspects may extract a natural experiment from a setting in which treatment assignment is otherwise quite biased, far from random. Isolation is a tool that focuses on those rare, brief instances, extracting a small natural experiment from otherwise useless data. We discuss the theory behind isolation and illustrate its use in a reanalysis of a well-known study of the effects of fertility on workforce participation. Whether a woman becomes pregnant at a certain moment in her life and whether she brings that pregnancy to term may reflect her aspirations for family, education and career, the degree of control she exerts over her fertility, and the quality of her relationship with the father; moreover, these aspirations and relationships are unlikely to be recorded with precision in surveys and censuses, and they may confound studies of workforce participation. However, given that a women is pregnant and will bring the pregnancy to term, whether she will have twins or a single child is, to a large extent, simply luck. Given that a woman is pregnant at a certain moment, the differential comparison of two types of pregnancies on workforce participation, twins or a single child, may be close to randomized, not biased by unmeasured aspirations. In this comparison, we find in our case study that mothers of twins had more children but only slightly reduced workforce participation, approximately 5% less time at work for an additional child.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2014

Matching for balance, pairing for heterogeneity in an observational study of the effectiveness of for-profit and not-for-profit high schools in Chile

Conventionally, the construction of a pair-matched sample selects treated and control units and pairs them in a single step with a view to balancing observed covariates $\mathbf{x}$ and reducing the heterogeneity or dispersion of treated-minus-control response differences, $Y$. In contrast, the method of cardinality matching developed here first selects the maximum number of units subject to covariate balance constraints and, with a balanced sample for $\mathbf{x}$ in hand, then separately pairs the units to minimize heterogeneity in $Y$. Reduced heterogeneity of pair differences in responses $Y$ is known to reduce sensitivity to unmeasured biases, so one might hope that cardinality matching would succeed at both tasks, balancing $\mathbf{x}$, stabilizing $Y$. We use cardinality matching in an observational study of the effectiveness of for-profit and not-for-profit private high schools in Chile - a controversial subject in Chile - focusing on students who were in government run primary schools in 2004 but then switched to private high schools. By pairing to minimize heterogeneity in a cardinality match that has balanced covariates, a meaningful reduction in sensitivity to unmeasured biases is obtained.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2013

Stronger instruments via integer programming in an observational study of late preterm birth outcomes

In an optimal nonbipartite match, a single population is divided into matched pairs to minimize a total distance within matched pairs. Nonbipartite matching has been used to strengthen instrumental variables in observational studies of treatment effects, essentially by forming pairs that are similar in terms of covariates but very different in the strength of encouragement to accept the treatment. Optimal nonbipartite matching is typically done using network optimization techniques that can be quick, running in polynomial time, but these techniques limit the tools available for matching. Instead, we use integer programming techniques, thereby obtaining a wealth of new tools not previously available for nonbipartite matching, including fine and near-fine balance for several nominal variables, forced near balance on means and optimal subsetting. We illustrate the methods in our on-going study of outcomes of late-preterm births in California, that is, births of 34 to 36 weeks of gestation. Would lengthening the time in the hospital for such births reduce the frequency of rapid readmissions? A straightforward comparison of babies who stay for a shorter or longer time would be severely biased, because the principal reason for a long stay is some serious health problem. We need an instrument, something inconsequential and haphazard that encourages a shorter or a longer stay in the hospital. It turns out that babies born at certain times of day tend to stay overnight once with a shorter length of stay, whereas babies born at other times of day tend to stay overnight twice with a longer length of stay, and there is nothing particularly special about a baby who is born at 11:00 pm.

stat.AP↗