arXiv subjects

Josafat Leal Filho

Publications and source records attributed to Josafat Leal Filho.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

What Do Latent Predictive Vehicle Representations Retain? Measuring State, Geometry, and Local Response

Models of vehicle dynamics learned from logged states and commands complement physics-based models, and latent world models, which predict in a learned representation, are used to plan and train controllers in other domains. Vehicle controllers are usually specified in physical terms: costs, limits, and references depend on position, yaw angle, speed, and yaw rate, and the optimizer compares or differentiates predicted outcomes across nearby commands. A latent model placed in such a controller must therefore let these quantities be recovered and must change its predictions with commands as the vehicle does, and prediction error on its own latent targets measures neither. We contribute a measurement protocol for action-conditioned latent predictors with a physical readout that separately tests retention, physical-neighborhood organization, forecasting, and local response to command perturbations, using an untrained-encoder reference and three matched response paths that locate errors in the representation or the predictor. In a case study of a temporal joint-embedding predictive model trained on signals logged in IPG CarMaker, the representations retain the measured planar outputs, though an untrained encoder of the same architecture retains them slightly better; future-command input improves one-second forecasts with retention nearly unchanged; and responses to small command pulses diverge from the simulator already in latent coordinates, raising regret when choosing among nearby commands in all comparisons. Updating the predictor on responses corrects them locally at a cost in forecast accuracy. Measuring retention, forecasting, and local response separately is thus what qualifies a predictive latent as a candidate model for control, and the protocol provides the basis for its closed-loop evaluation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

An Embedded RISC-V Evaluation of Kolmogorov--Arnold Networks in Hard-Constrained Recurrent Physics-Informed Models

Hard-constrained recurrent physics-informed networks (HRPINNs) embed known dynamics inside a recurrent numerical integrator and restrict a neural branch to learning only the residual dynamics that the first-principles model does not capture. Kolmogorov--Arnold Networks (KANs) have been proposed as parameter-efficient replacements for multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) in such residual branches, but their learnable B-spline activations follow a markedly different execution profile. Building on prior work that characterized when a vanilla B-spline KAN matches or underperforms an MLP as an HRPINN residual branch in discovery accuracy, this paper asks whether that parameter efficiency survives deployment. Using identical trained weights, we measured execution latency, energy per integration step, and dependability under post-training quantization in the closed recurrent loop on a RISC-V RV64GC platform without vector extensions (StarFive VisionFive~2, SiFive U74). For the two accuracy-comparable pairs, the KAN residual branch executed $13.5\times$ and $8.0\times$ slower and consumed $11.3\times$ and $5.6\times$ more energy per integration step (3.7\,$μ$J against 0.33\,$μ$J for the smallest pair); across all four parameter-matched size tiers the ranges are $4.7\times$--$14.5\times$ and $4.7\times$--$18.7\times$. Under INT8 quantization, KAN trajectories diverged up to $43\times$ earlier than matched MLPs; the damage traces to weight quantization, not to input-side knot-interval misassignment. These results indicate that the parameter efficiency reported for KANs does not transfer to deployment cost on scalar embedded cores, and that an MLP residual branch is the more dependable default for embedded HRPINN deployment unless specific quantization co-design is used.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Empirical Stability Analysis of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks in Hard-Constrained Recurrent Physics-Informed Discovery

We investigate the integration of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) into hard-constrained recurrent physics-informed architectures (HRPINN) to evaluate the fidelity of learned residual manifolds in oscillatory systems. Motivated by the Kolmogorov-Arnold representation theorem and preliminary gray-box results, we hypothesized that KANs would enable efficient recovery of unknown terms compared to MLPs. Through initial sensitivity analysis on configuration sensitivity, parameter scale, and training paradigm, we found that while small KANs are competitive on univariate polynomial residuals (Duffing), they exhibit severe hyperparameter fragility, instability in deeper configurations, and consistent failure on multiplicative terms (Van der Pol), generally outperformed by standard MLPs. These empirical challenges highlight limitations of the additive inductive bias in the original KAN formulation for state coupling and provide preliminary empirical evidence of inductive bias limitations for future hybrid modeling.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Hard-Constrained Neural Networks with Physics-Embedded Architecture for Residual Dynamics Learning and Invariant Enforcement in Cyber-Physical Systems

This paper presents a framework for physics-informed learning in complex cyber-physical systems governed by differential equations with both unknown dynamics and algebraic invariants. First, we formalize the Hybrid Recurrent Physics-Informed Neural Network (HRPINN), a general-purpose architecture that embeds known physics as a hard structural constraint within a recurrent integrator to learn only residual dynamics. Second, we introduce the Projected HRPINN (PHRPINN), a novel extension that integrates a predict-project mechanism to strictly enforce algebraic invariants by design. The framework is supported by a theoretical analysis of its representational capacity. We validate HRPINN on a real-world battery prognostics DAE and evaluate PHRPINN on a suite of standard constrained benchmarks. The results demonstrate the framework's potential for achieving high accuracy and data efficiency, while also highlighting critical trade-offs between physical consistency, computational cost, and numerical stability, providing practical guidance for its deployment.

cs.LG↗