arXiv subjects

Jose A. Bird

Publications and source records attributed to Jose A. Bird.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

RegNetAgents: A Multi-Agent Framework for Cross-Network Regulatory Driver Identification in Cancer Genomics

We introduce RegNetAgents, an AI-oriented multi-agent framework for structured, query-driven regulatory candidate identification across heterogeneous gene regulatory networks. The system enables unified analysis of bulk tumor and single-cell-derived ARACNe networks by integrating TCGA-derived cancer networks with large-scale single-cell regulatory networks from the GREmLN project. For a given focal gene, the framework performs dual-network classification, cancer gene filtering using OncoKB annotations, and mode-of-action (MoA) assignment for tumor-derived regulatory relationships. Candidates are ranked by evidence consistency across networks (Both, TCGA-only, GREmLN-only). The system is implemented as a multi-agent LangGraph DAG workflow, accessible through a unified Python API and Model Context Protocol (MCP) client, operating as a downstream analytical layer over precomputed regulatory networks rather than a network inference method. Across eleven breast cancer (BRCA) and twelve colorectal cancer (COAD) focal genes, RegNetAgents identifies candidate regulators significantly enriched for OncoKB-annotated cancer genes. TCGA-derived candidates show strong enrichment (Stouffer Z = 6.69 for BRCA and 6.95 for COAD), while GREmLN-derived candidates also demonstrate significant enrichment (Z = 5.51 for BRCA and 7.06 for COAD; all p < 0.0001). No enrichment is observed in housekeeping or non-driver control gene sets, supporting signal specificity. An extended module enables structured evaluation of oncogenic potential, druggability, clinical relevance, and network vulnerability, supporting end-to-end interpretation from candidate identification to biological hypothesis generation. RegNetAgents establishes an interpretable AI framework for cross-network regulatory candidate identification in cancer genomics.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

CASCADE: An Agentic Regulatory Network Framework for Patient-Data-Validated Downstream Perturbation Prediction

CASCADE is an agentic framework that predicts downstream transcriptional effects of gene perturbation from precomputed ARACNe regulatory networks, exposed via MCP. Prior work validates such tools by checking whether predicted genes are known cancer genes (membership); we instead test whether the predicted direction of change matches reality, using focal-gene copy-number amplification as a dosage-based proxy for the inverse of knockdown against real TCGA patient tumor data. For MYC, CASCADE's predicted knockdown targets show strong concordance with real amplified-vs-non-amplified tumor expression across three cancer types (BRCA: 90.0%, COAD: 72.0%, STAD: 85.7%; all p<0.0013), well above permutation baselines, surviving a PAM50 subtype control and replicating in an independent cohort (METABRIC, 87.2%). Compared against curated MSigDB gene-set baselines via Fisher's exact test, CASCADE's accuracy is not shown to exceed existing public knowledge of MYC- or E2F-driven biology, though its gene-specific direction-calling clearly outperforms a naive uniform guess. Extending to fifteen additional genes, validation proves gene-specific rather than universal: proliferation-machinery regulators mostly replicate, while lineage-identity transcription factors and one cyclin-D paralog (CCND2) consistently fail, a pattern we discuss as a hedged, post-hoc hypothesis. We separately benchmark whether an LLM-based agent correctly grounds natural-language requests into CASCADE's real MCP tool calls. Across 35 queries, a documented local model reaches 71.4% exact match (85.7% for a larger model); schema and gene-alias failures are resolved by scale or server-side correction, but both models confidently default to the wrong perturbation type on ambiguous queries, a failure a targeted fix could not resolve because its trigger condition never occurs.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Orchestra: Corroboration-Based Regulatory Candidate Discovery via Composed Bioinformatics MCP Agents

Orchestra composes two independently built bioinformatics MCP servers -- RegNetAgents, which infers gene regulatory network topology from ARACNe networks, and CASCADE, which supplies four independent evidence sources (LINCS knockdown, DepMap essentiality, super-enhancer status, DoRothEA transcription-factor confidence) -- into one multi-agent workflow exposed via the Model Context Protocol. Its central architectural claim is that requiring RegNetAgents' topology evidence and CASCADE's experimental evidence to agree on a candidate regulator yields a more trustworthy candidate than either alone -- not previously tested directly, since RegNetAgents' own validation asked only whether its candidate lists beat chance. We test this on the TCGA tumor-acquired regulator tier (regulators in a gene's tumor ARACNe network but absent from the GREmLN population-averaged baseline), selecting candidates by ARACNe mutual-information (MI) edge weight. On RegNetAgents' published BRCA/COAD focal-gene panel plus matched negative controls, agreement among at least 2 of the 4 CASCADE sources predicts OncoKB cancer-gene status among focal genes (odds ratio 2.89, Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted p=0.0166) but not among negative controls (p=0.0721); a single source is not diagnostic for either group. The pattern replicates and strengthens in a third cancer type, STAD, on a separately constructed panel (odds ratio 5.82), and against an independently curated ground truth (the Sanger COSMIC Cancer Gene Census). MI edge weight is the strongest single predictor overall (p=0.0003); a logistic-regression likelihood-ratio test confirms corroboration adds value beyond it in both panels (p=0.0234; p=0.0001). Every experiment invokes Orchestra's real agentic entry point.

q-bio.MN↗