SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Joseph J. Lee

Publications and source records attributed to Joseph J. Lee.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Confidence Intervals for Rate Estimation with Importance Sampling in Autonomous Vehicle Evaluation

Accounting for both rare events and complex sampling presents challenges when quantifying uncertainty for rate estimation in autonomous vehicle performance evaluation. In this paper, we introduce a statistical formulation of this problem and develop a unified compound Poisson model framework for unbiased rate estimation through the Horvitz Thompson estimator. Though asymptotic theory for the model is available, the inference of confidence intervals (CIs) in the presence of rare events requires new investigation. We also advocate for a new monotonicity criterion for rate CIs--summing the rates of disjoint types of events should produce not only a higher point estimate but also higher confidence bounds than for the individual rates--that facilitates interpretability in real applications. We propose a novel exponential bootstrap (EB) method for CI construction based on a fiducial argument; it satisfies the monotonicity property, while novel extensions of some existing methods do not. Comprehensive numerical studies show that EB performs well for a wide range of settings relevant to our applications. Fast implementation of EB based on saddlepoint approximation is also developed, which may be of independent interest.

stat.ME

More Powerful Multiple Testing in Randomized Experiments with Non-Compliance

Two common concerns raised in analyses of randomized experiments are (i) appropriately handling issues of non-compliance, and (ii) appropriately adjusting for multiple tests (e.g., on multiple outcomes or subgroups). Although simple intention-to-treat (ITT) and Bonferroni methods are valid in terms of type I error, they can each lead to a substantial loss of power; when employing both simultaneously, the total loss may be severe. Alternatives exist to address each concern. Here we propose an analysis method for experiments involving both features that merges posterior predictive $p$-values for complier causal effects with randomization-based multiple comparisons adjustments; the results are valid familywise tests that are doubly advantageous: more powerful than both those based on standard ITT statistics and those using traditional multiple comparison adjustments. The operating characteristics and advantages of our method are demonstrated through a series of simulated experiments and an analysis of the United States Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Study, where our methods lead to different conclusions regarding the significance of estimated JTPA effects.

stat.ME