Jovana Davidovic | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

The End of Human Judgment in the Kill Chain? Relocating Initiative and Interpretation with Agentic AI

Large language model-based agents are increasingly being integrated into core battlefield functions, including intelligence analysis, data fusion, and battlefield management. This paper argues that the very features that make such agents operationally attractive, namely their capacity for initiative, interpretation, their goal-directedness, and dynamic memory, are the same features that render context-appropriate human judgment and control substantively ineffectual in those parts of the kill chain where agents operate. Drawing on specific use cases, the paper argues that by relocating initiative and interpretation, LLM-based agents displace human decision-making in ways that makes their use incompatible with the requirement of human judgment and control which is central to existing governance frameworks, like those proposed by the GGE-CCW and REAIM. The paper concludes that a subset of agentic AI applications, particularly those deployed for data fusion and battle management in lethal contexts, cannot be used justifiably on the battlefield under current and foreseeable conditions, and proposes two ways for the international governance community to respond to this challenge.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2024

A Framework for Assurance Audits of Algorithmic Systems

An increasing number of regulations propose AI audits as a mechanism for achieving transparency and accountability for artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Despite some converging norms around various forms of AI auditing, auditing for the purpose of compliance and assurance currently lacks agreed-upon practices, procedures, taxonomies, and standards. We propose the criterion audit as an operationalizable compliance and assurance external audit framework. We model elements of this approach after financial auditing practices, and argue that AI audits should similarly provide assurance to their stakeholders about AI organizations' ability to govern their algorithms in ways that mitigate harms and uphold human values. We discuss the necessary conditions for the criterion audit and provide a procedural blueprint for performing an audit engagement in practice. We illustrate how this framework can be adapted to current regulations by deriving the criteria on which bias audits can be performed for in-scope hiring algorithms, as required by the recently effective New York City Local Law 144 of 2021. We conclude by offering a critical discussion on the benefits, inherent limitations, and implementation challenges of applying practices of the more mature financial auditing industry to AI auditing where robust guardrails against quality assurance issues are only starting to emerge. Our discussion -- informed by experiences in performing these audits in practice -- highlights the critical role that an audit ecosystem plays in ensuring the effectiveness of audits.

cs.CY↗