Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Joy Morris

Publications and source records attributed to Joy Morris.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Most Generalized Petersen graphs of girth 8 have cop number 4

A generalized Petersen graph $GP(n,k)$ is a regular cubic graph on $2n$ vertices (the parameter $k$ is used to define some of the edges). It was previously shown (Ball et al., 2015) that the cop number of $GP(n,k)$ is at most $4$, for all permissible values of $n$ and $k$. In this paper we prove that the cop number of "most" generalized Petersen graphs is exactly $4$. More precisely, we show that unless $n$ and $k$ fall into certain specified categories, then the cop number of $GP(n,k)$ is $4$. The graphs to which our result applies all have girth $8$. In fact, our argument is slightly more general: we show that in any cubic graph of girth at least $8$, unless there exist two cycles of length $8$ whose intersection is a path of length $2$, then the cop number of the graph is at least $4$. Even more generally, in a graph of girth at least $9$ and minimum valency $δ$, the cop number is at least $δ+1$.

math.CO↗

On Generalised Petersen Graphs of Girth 7 that have Cop Number 4

We show that if $n=7k/i$ with $i \in \{1,2,3\}$ then the cop number of the generalised Petersen graph $GP(n,k)$ is $4$, with some small previously-known exceptions. It was previously proved by Ball et al. (2015) that the cop number of any generalised Petersen graph is at most $4$. The results in this paper explain all of the known generalised Petersen graphs that actually have cop number $4$ but were not previously explained by Morris et al. in a recent preprint, and places them in the context of infinite families. (More precisely, the preprint by Morris et al. explains all known generalised Petersen graphs with cop number $4$ and girth $8$, while this paper explains those that have girth $7$.)

math.CO↗

Groups for which it is easy to detect graphical regular representations

We say that a finite group G is "DRR-detecting" if, for every subset S of G, either the Cayley digraph Cay(G,S) is a digraphical regular representation (that is, its automorphism group acts regularly on its vertex set) or there is a nontrivial group automorphism phi of G such that phi(S) = S. We show that every nilpotent DRR-detecting group is a p-group, but that the wreath product of two cyclic groups of order p is not DRR-detecting, for every odd prime p. We also show that if G and H are nontrivial groups that admit a digraphical regular representation and either gcd(|G|,|H|) = 1, or H is not DRR-detecting, then the direct product G x H is not DRR-detecting. Some of these results also have analogues for graphical regular representations.

math.CO↗

Two new families of non-CCA groups

We determine two new infinite families of Cayley graphs that admit colour-preserving automorphisms that do not come from the group action. By definition, this means that these Cayley graphs fail to have the CCA (Cayley Colour Automorphism) property, and the corresponding infinite families of groups also fail to have the CCA property. The families of groups consist of the direct product of any dihedral group of order $2n$ where $n \ge 3$ is odd, with either itself, or the cyclic group of order $n$. In particular, this family of examples includes the smallest non-CCA group that had not fit into any previous family of known non-CCA groups.

math.CO↗

Two families of graphs that are Cayley on nonisomorphic groups

A number of authors have studied the question of when a graph can be represented as a Cayley graph on more than one nonisomorphic group. The work to date has focussed on a few special situations: when the groups are $p$-groups; when the groups have order $pq$; when the Cayley graphs are normal; or when the groups are both abelian. In this paper, we construct two infinite families of graphs, each of which is Cayley on an abelian group and a nonabelian group. These families include the smallest examples of such graphs that had not appeared in other results.

math.CO↗

On the asymptotic enumeration of Cayley graphs

In this paper we are interested in the asymptotic enumeration of Cayley graphs. It has previously been shown that almost every Cayley digraph has the smallest possible automorphism group: that is, it is a digraphical regular representation (DRR). In this paper, we approach the corresponding question for undirected Cayley graphs. The situation is complicated by the fact that there are two infinite families of groups that do not admit any graphical regular representation (GRR). The strategy for digraphs involved analysing separately the cases where the regular group $R$ has a nontrivial proper normal subgroup $N$ with the property that the automorphism group of the digraph fixes each $N$-coset setwise, and the cases where it does not. In this paper, we deal with undirected graphs in the case where the regular group has such a nontrivial proper normal subgroup.

math.CO↗

Classification of vertex-transitive digraphs via automorphism group

In the mid-1990s, two groups of authors independently obtained classifications of vertex-transitive graphs whose order is a product of two distinct primes. In the intervening years it has become clear that there is additional information concerning these graphs that would be useful, as well as making explicit the extensions of these results to digraphs. Additionally, there are several small errors in some of the papers that were involved in this classification. The purpose of this paper is to fill in the missing information as well as correct all known errors.

math.CO↗

Asymptotic enumeration of Cayley digraphs

In this paper we show that almost all Cayley digraphs have automorphism group as small as possible; that is, they are digraphical regular representations (DRRs). More precisely, we show that as $r$ tends to infinity, for every finite group $R$ of order $r$, out of all possible Cayley digraphs on $R$ the proportion whose automorphism group is as small as possible tends to $1$. This proves a natural conjecture first proposed in $1982$ by Babai and Godsil.

math.CO↗

Every finite non-solvable group admits an Oriented Regular Representation

In this paper we give a partial answer to a 1980 question of Lazslo Babai: "Which [finite] groups admit an oriented graph as a DRR?" That is, which finite groups admit an oriented regular representation (ORR)? We show that every finite non-solvable group admits an ORR, and provide a tool that may prove useful in showing that some families of finite solvable groups admit ORRs. We also completely characterize all finite groups that can be generated by at most three elements, according to whether or not they admit ORRs.

math.CO↗

Classification of finite groups that admit an oriented regular representation

This is the third, and last, of a series of papers dealing with oriented regular representations. Here we complete the classification of finite groups that admit an oriented regular representation (or ORR for short), and give a complete answer to a 1980 question of Laszlo Babai: "Which [finite] groups admit an oriented graph as a DRR?" It is easy to see and well-understood that generalised dihedral groups do not admit ORRs. We prove that, with 11 small exceptions (having orders ranging from 8 to 64), every finite group that is not generalised dihedral has an ORR.

math.CO↗

Characterising CCA Sylow cyclic groups whose order is not divisible by four

A Cayley graph on a group $G$ has a natural edge-colouring. We say that such a graph is CCA if every automorphism of the graph that preserves this edge-colouring is an element of the normaliser of the regular representation of $G$. A group $G$ is then said to be CCA if every Cayley graph on $G$ is CCA. Our main result is a characterisation of non-CCA graphs on groups that are Sylow cyclic and whose order is not divisible by four. We also provide several new constructions of non-CCA graphs.

math.CO↗

Most Rigid Representations and Cayley index

For any finite group $G$, a natural question to ask is the order of the smallest possible automorphism group for a Cayley graph on $G$. A particular Cayley graph whose automorphism group has this order is referred to as an MRR (Most Rigid Representation), and its Cayley index is a numerical indicator of this value. Study of GRRs showed that with the exception of two infinite families and seven individual groups, every group admits a Cayley graph whose MRR is a GRR, so that the Cayley index is 1. The full answer to the question of finding the smallest possible Cayley index for a Cayley graph on a fixed group was almost completed in previous work, but the precise answers for some finite groups and one infinite family of groups were left open. We fill in the remaining gaps to completely answer this question.

math.CO↗

A finite simple group is CCA if and only if it has no element of order four

A Cayley graph for a group $G$ is CCA if every automorphism of the graph that preserves the edge-orbits under the regular representation of $G$ is an element of the normaliser of $G$. A group $G$ is then said to be CCA if every connected Cayley graph on $G$ is CCA. We show that a finite simple group is CCA if and only if it has no element of order 4. We also show that "many" 2-groups are non-CCA.

math.GR↗

Digraphs with small automorphism groups that are Cayley on two nonisomorphic groups

Let $Γ=\mathrm{Cay}(G,S)$ be a Cayley digraph on a group $G$ and let $A=\mathrm{Aut}(Γ)$. The Cayley index of $Γ$ is $|A:G|$. It has previously been shown that, if $p$ is a prime, $G$ is a cyclic $p$-group and $A$ contains a noncyclic regular subgroup, then the Cayley index of $Γ$ is superexponential in $p$. We present evidence suggesting that cyclic groups are exceptional in this respect. Specifically, we establish the contrasting result that, if $p$ is an odd prime and $G$ is abelian but not cyclic, and has order a power of $p$ at least $p^3$, then there is a Cayley digraph $Γ$ on $G$ whose Cayley index is just $p$, and whose automorphism group contains a nonabelian regular subgroup.

math.CO↗

Isomorphisms of Cayley graphs on nilpotent groups

Let S be a finite generating set of a torsion-free, nilpotent group G. We show that every automorphism of the Cayley graph Cay(G;S) is affine. (That is, every automorphism of the graph is obtained by composing a group automorphism with multiplication by an element of the group.) More generally, we show that if Cay(G;S) and Cay(G';S') are connected Cayley graphs of finite valency on two nilpotent groups G and G', then every isomorphism from Cay(G;S) to Cay(G';S') factors through to a well-defined affine map from G/N to G'/N', where N and N' are the torsion subgroups of G and G', respectively. For the special case where the groups are abelian, these results were previously proved by A.A.Ryabchenko and C.Loeh, respectively.

math.CO↗

On Color Preserving Automorphisms of Cayley Graphs of Odd Square-free Order

An automorphism $α$ of a Cayley graph $Cay(G,S)$ of a group $G$ with connection set $S$ is color-preserving if $α(g,gs) = (h,hs)$ or $(h,hs^{-1})$ for every edge $(g,gs)\in E(Cay(G,S))$. If every color-preserving automorphism of $Cay(G,S)$ is also affine, then $Cay(G,S)$ is a CCA (Cayley color automorphism) graph. If every Cayley graph $Cay(G,S)$ is a CCA graph, then $G$ is a CCA group. Hujdurović, Kutnar, D.W. Morris, and J. Morris have shown that every non-CCA group $G$ contains a section isomorphic to the nonabelian group $F_{21}$ of order $21$. We first show that there is a unique non-CCA Cayley graph $Γ$ of $F_{21}$. We then show that if $Cay(G,S)$ is a non-CCA graph of a group $G$ of odd square-free order, then $G = H\times F_{21}$ for some CCA group $H$, and $Cay(G,S) = Cay(G,T)\BoxΓ$.

math.CO↗

On colour-preserving automorphisms of Cayley graphs

We study the automorphisms of a Cayley graph that preserve its natural edge-colouring. More precisely, we are interested in groups G, such that every such automorphism of every connected Cayley graph on G has a very simple form: the composition of a left-translation and a group automorphism. We find classes of groups that have the property, and we determine the orders of all groups that do not have the property. We also have analogous results for automorphisms that permute the colours, rather than preserving them.

math.CO↗