A Variational Framework for the Complexity of PDE Solutions
Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) are fundamental mathematical models for describing physical phenomena, yet most PDEs of practical interest require numerical approximations. The feasibility of such methods is constrained by existing computational models. Since digital computers are the primary realizations of numerical computations, and Turing machines define their theoretical limits, computability of PDE solutions is of fundamental significance. It provides a rigorous framework to distinguish equations that are effectively solvable from those that encode undecidable or non-computable behavior. Once computability is established, complexity theory quantifies the resources required to approximate PDE solutions. In this work, we present a novel framework based on least-squares variational formulations and associated gradient flows to analyze the computability and complexity of PDE solutions from an optimization perspective. Our approach approximates PDE solution operators via discrete gradient flows, linking PDE properties, such as coercivity, ellipticity, and convexity, to solution complexity. Within this setting, we characterize representation- and discretization-dependent sufficient conditions for regimes where PDEs admit polynomial-time approximations, as well as regimes exhibiting complexity blowup, where polynomial-time input data produce solutions with super-polynomial complexity. In summary, this paper develops a variational framework for analyzing computability and computational complexity of PDE solution classes. The results show how PDE structure and solution regularity influence their complexity, by establishing sufficient conditions for computability and complexity bounds. Beyond the theoretical characterization, the framework provides guidelines for effective numerical methods and contributes to understanding the limitations of digital computation for PDE problems.