Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Juan J. Colomina-Alminana

Publications and source records attributed to Juan J. Colomina-Alminana.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Guises and Perspectives: An Intentional and Hyperintensional Sketch

This paper develops a formal logic for guises based on the work of Héctor-Neri Castañeda, who understood relations from an internalist viewpoint, following Leibniz. We introduce a syntax, model theory, and proof theory for an intensional logic in which guises (taken as bundles of properties equipped with intention) serve as primary semantic objects. The system integrates (i) a Leibnizian containment semantics for singular truths, (ii) an intentional operator that captures internal relations among guises, and (iii) a modal layer for possibility and necessity modeled as maximally consistent closures. We establish core metatheoretic results (e.i. soundness and canonical-model completeness sketches) and analyze hyperintensional phenomena such as substitution failure in intentional contexts, quasi-indexicality, and de se reference. We compare the framework to classical intensional semantics (Montague), property theory (Bealer), hyperintensional logics (Fine), situation semantics (Barwise and Perry), and to the Leibniz program for a calculus of concepts. The result is a selfcontained formal framework that demonstrates that relations are not external causal links but intentional internal structures encoded in the guises through which agents and objects are conceived: i.e., they are perspectives.

cs.LO↗

Extensionalism without Logicism: Ambrose and Extensional Logic

Drawing primarily on her early work (1931-1934), I argue that Alice Ambrose develops a philosophical project centered on preserving the rigor of extensional logic while rejecting the metaphysical and epistemological endorsements of logicism because of its commitment to the notion of material infinity. Positioning Ambrose as a transitional figure between formalism (Russell) and the constructivist turn represented by intuitionism (Brouwer), I demonstrate how Ambrose offers a practice oriented statement of finitist extensionalism. Employing only extensional methods (considering classes, relations, and propositions by reference to their members and truth values instead of mental processes), Ambrose reformulates an existential claim about pi as an explicit infinite disjunction of concrete instances insisting, against intensional projects, that such claims gain meaning only through a finite stopping rule that produces a witness.

math.HO↗

Alice Ambrose on Logic, A Priori Concepts, and the Epistemology of Convention

This essay argues that Alice Ambrose precedes key elements later critiques by Quine, first of Truth by convention (Quine 1936) and later of the analytic-synthetic distinction (Quine 1951). I demonstrate how Ambrose identifies in writing as early as in 1931: (1) the paradox of treating logical principles as mere conventions, (2) the infinite regress in stipulative definitions, (3) the preconditional role of logic for any convention, and (4) the instability of the analytic/synthetic divide. Ambrose, therefore, prefigures Margaret Macdonald (1934) unpublished dissertation (Cf. Spinney 2025) and predates some major contributions to the philosophy of logic by Quine a few years before he made them popular.

math.HO↗