arXiv subjects

Jubayer Al Mahmud

Publications and source records attributed to Jubayer Al Mahmud.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

CLAIR-Fin: An Adversarial Multi-Agent Framework for Claim-Level Verification and Adaptive Debate in Cross-Modal Financial QA

Existing defenses against hallucination in retrieval-augmented and multi-agent pipelines remain partial: evidence is trusted despite modality disagreement, debate verifies an aggregate report rather than individual claims, and such verification occurs only after drafting, leaving inter-agent errors undetected until the final text. To close this gap, we present CLAIR-Fin, a nine-agent framework that decomposes each question into atomic claims maintained in a typed Financial Claim Ledger. Each claim is resolved through Asymmetric Evidence Authority, which conditions evidence trust on claim type rather than treating all modalities as equally reliable; Chain-of-Custody Verification, which checks grounding at the hand-off between drafting and adversarial review rather than only at the pipeline's exit; an Adaptive Rebuttal Cycle, which routes contested claims through adversarial debate whose depth scales with what that debate finds; and a terminal entailment audit paired with a continuous Hallucination Risk Index that distinguishes claims that passed scrutiny from claims never contested. We evaluate CLAIR-Fin on BB-FinQA-X, a 500-question cross-modal financial evaluation set built from Bangladesh Bank Annual Report material, stratified by query type, format, and difficulty. Relative to a single-pass retrieval-augmented generation baseline, it raises faithfulness ($0.780 \rightarrow 0.889$) while abstaining on 5.4% of questions when evidence is insufficient rather than forcing an unsupported response, and it exceeds stronger retrieval-strategy baselines such as HyDE and Graph-RAG on faithfulness ($\leq 0.874$).

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

TeachMateGPT: A Multi-Agent Knowledge-Grounded Framework for Pedagogical Assessment Generation from Science Curriculum Materials

Automatically generating textbook-grounded assessment items can reduce science teachers' workload, but existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems rely on flat retrieval, support only single-question generation, lack safeguards against weak evidence, and are ill-suited to low-resource, board-exam-structured curricula. We address these limitations with TeachMateGPT, a multi-agent system contributing four advances to curriculum-grounded science-assessment authoring. (i) COPE, a hierarchical knowledge base replacing token-window chunking with a multi-resolution index that segments documents along syllabus structure and links them at three granularities via a traversable graph-based lineage, matching evidence to each topic's instructional level. (ii) A staged, fail-closed agent pipeline replacing one-shot retrieve-then-generate: routing gates search, retrieval fuses dense and lexical evidence under a coverage gate that withholds generation on insufficient evidence, and specialist agents draft objective and constructed-response items. (iii) SAVER, a source-attributed verification protocol scoring faithfulness, relevance, and hallucination risk against retrieved evidence, applying stricter grounding checks across each creative question's four sub-parts, paired with teacher-in-the-loop evaluation rather than automatic filtering. (iv) NCTB-SciGen8, a curriculum-grounded dataset of 198 items (143 multiple-choice, 55 creative questions) spanning all 14 chapters of the NCTB Class 8 science textbook, produced by the pipeline and rated by three practicing teachers. TeachMateGPT raises faithfulness (0.68 $\rightarrow$ 0.96) and answer relevancy (0.60 $\rightarrow$ 0.89) over a vanilla RAG baseline.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Guiding Language Models to Be More Empathetic: Culturally Sensitive Mental Health Advice Generation Through Human-LLM Collaboration

Despite recent advances in large language models (LLMs), their ability to generate empathetic mental health counseling responses in low-resource languages remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we curate 625 authentic mental health cases from three complementary sources: (1) publicly available Facebook posts discussing mental health concerns, (2) transcripts from the Bangladeshi television program "Ami Akhon Ki Korbo", and (3) anonymized student questionnaire responses covering diverse emotional and psychological challenges. Based on these cases, we build an evaluation corpus comprising advice written by licensed clinical psychologists and responses generated by three modern proprietary LLMs: GPT-4o Mini, Claude 4.5 Haiku, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. We further propose the Role-Playing Reflective Chain-of-Thought Advisory Framework (RP-RCAF), a task-specific prompting strategy that combines expert-authored few-shot examples with structured self-reflection to produce supportive, culturally aware, and ethically aligned counseling through a compassionate advisor persona. We also introduce the Grok 4-Based Response Evaluation and Scoring Framework (G-REFS), which integrates automated assessment with expert psychologist validation across emotional sensitivity, cultural appropriateness, linguistic clarity, and ethical soundness. Experimental results show that RP-RCAF consistently outperforms conventional prompting across all evaluated models and produces responses that more closely align with professional psychological counseling.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2020

A Comparative Study of AHP and Fuzzy AHP Method for Inconsistent Data

In various cases of decision analysis we use two popular methods: Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) and Fuzzy based AHP or Fuzzy AHP. Both the methods deal with stochastic data and can determine decision result through Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) process. Obviously resulting values of the two methods are not same though same set of data is fed into them. In this research work, we have tried to observe similarities and dissimilarities between two methods outputs. Almost same trend or fluctuations in outputs have been seen for both methods for same set of input data which are not consistent. Both method outputs ups and down fluctuations are same for fifty percent cases.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2020

A Survey of Methods for Managing the Classification and Solution of Data Imbalance Problem

The problem of class imbalance is extensive for focusing on numerous applications in the real world. In such a situation, nearly all of the examples are labeled as one class called majority class, while far fewer examples are labeled as the other class usually, the more important class is called minority. Over the last few years, several types of research have been carried out on the issue of class imbalance, including data sampling, cost-sensitive analysis, Genetic Programming based models, bagging, boosting, etc. Nevertheless, in this survey paper, we enlisted the 24 related studies in the years 2003, 2008, 2010, 2012 and 2014 to 2019, focusing on the architecture of single, hybrid, and ensemble method design to understand the current status of improving classification output in machine learning techniques to fix problems with class imbalances. This survey paper also includes a statistical analysis of the classification algorithms under various methods and several other experimental conditions, as well as datasets used in different research papers.

cs.LG↗