SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Juerg Luterbacher

Publications and source records attributed to Juerg Luterbacher.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Deep-learning surrogate crop modelling for scalable seasonal-to-climate crop-risk assessment

Anticipating climate-related crop stress requires crop-risk information that is spatially explicit, probabilistic and fast enough for large seasonal forecast and climate-scenario ensembles. We present the Surrogate Engine for Crop Simulations Framework (SECSF), a deep-learning framework that emulates the process-based ECroPS model using only daily minimum and maximum temperature and precipitation. Trained on ERA5-forced ECroPS simulations for grain maize and spring barley, SECSF closely reproduces daily crop-growth dynamics and harvest timing while reducing computational cost by around four orders of magnitude, enabling ensemble-scale inference suitable for research and operational pipelines such as agricultural early warning and adaptation planning under uncertainty across seasonal-to-climate timescales. When forced with seasonal forecast data, SECSF captures spatially coherent crop-risk patterns across Europe in the high-impact year 2022 and is consistent with independent monitoring, supporting its use for probabilistic Areas of Concern. Under CMIP6 scenarios, SECSF identifies the Mediterranean basin as a hotspot of maize-risk signals through mid-century, with more mixed signals in central and northern Europe.

cs.CE

Automated Fact-Checking of Climate Change Claims with Large Language Models

This paper presents Climinator, a novel AI-based tool designed to automate the fact-checking of climate change claims. Utilizing an array of Large Language Models (LLMs) informed by authoritative sources like the IPCC reports and peer-reviewed scientific literature, Climinator employs an innovative Mediator-Advocate framework. This design allows Climinator to effectively synthesize varying scientific perspectives, leading to robust, evidence-based evaluations. Our model demonstrates remarkable accuracy when testing claims collected from Climate Feedback and Skeptical Science. Notably, when integrating an advocate with a climate science denial perspective in our framework, Climinator's iterative debate process reliably converges towards scientific consensus, underscoring its adeptness at reconciling diverse viewpoints into science-based, factual conclusions. While our research is subject to certain limitations and necessitates careful interpretation, our approach holds significant potential. We hope to stimulate further research and encourage exploring its applicability in other contexts, including political fact-checking and legal domains.

cs.CL