SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Julian Schwazer

Publications and source records attributed to Julian Schwazer.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Usability Analysis of Configurator User Interfaces with Multimodal Large Language Models

Configuration is a key technology for tailoring complex software systems, services, and products. A successful application of configurators not only depends on technical correctness, performance, and domain modeling but also on their usability. While general usability heuristics are widely used, configurator-specific criteria and tool support for systematic user interface (UI) analysis are limited. This paper explores the use of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for scalable and semi-automated usability analysis of configurator UIs. We synthesize 18 configurator-specific usability criteria from the literature and apply these criteria in an MLLM-based analysis of 16 real-world configurators. Each criterion is assessed individually to generate severity ratings for usability issues and actionable improvement suggestions. A review of the results confirms that MLLMs can reliably identify configurator-specific usability issues and provide domain-aware improvement recommendations. Although human validation remains necessary, this approach has the potential to significantly reduce the required effort to analyze configurator usability.

cs.SE

Investigating Multimodal Large Language Models to Support Usability Evaluation

Usability evaluation is an essential method to support the design of effective and intuitive user interfaces (UIs). However, it commonly relies on resource-intensive, expert-driven methods, which limit its accessibility, especially for small organizations. Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have the potential to support usability evaluation by analyzing textual instructions together with visual UI context. This paper investigates the use of MLLMs as assistive tools for usability evaluation by framing the task as a prioritization problem. It identifies and explains usability issues and ranks them by severity. We report a study that compares the evaluations generated by multiple MLLMs with assessments from usability experts. The results demonstrate that MLLMs can offer complementary insights and support the efficient prioritization of critical issues. Additionally, we present an interactive visualization tool that enables the transparent review and validation of model-generated findings. Based on this, we outline concepts for integrating MLLM-based usability evaluation into real-world development workflows.

cs.SE