Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Juliana Schneider

Publications and source records attributed to Juliana Schneider.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Combining Unsupervised Learning and Statistical Inference For Multimodal N-of-1 Trials

N-of-1 trials are within-person crossover trials allowing both personalized and population-level inference on the effect of health interventions. Using the full potential of modern technologies, multimodal N-of-1 trials can integrate multimedia data for measuring health outcomes. However, methodology required for automated applications in large multimodal trials is not available yet. Here, we present an unsupervised approach for modeling multimodal N-of-1 trials, bypassing the need for expensive outcome labeling by medical experts. First, an autoencoder is trained on the outcome medical images. Then, the dimensionality of embeddings is reduced by extracting the first principal component, which is finally tested for its association with the treatment. Results from imaging simulation studies show high power in detecting a treatment effect while controlling type I error rates. An application to imaging N-of-1 trials of acne severity identifies individual treatment effects and supports that our methodology can enable large clinical multimodal N-of-1 trials.

stat.AP↗

Analyzing Population-Level Trials as N-of-1 Trials: an Application to Gait

Studying individual causal effects of health interventions is of interest whenever intervention effects are heterogeneous between study participants. Conducting N-of-1 trials, which are single-person randomized controlled trials, is the gold standard for their analysis. In this study, we propose to re-analyze existing population-level studies as N-of-1 trials as an alternative, and we use gait as a use case for illustration. Gait data were collected from 16 young and healthy participants under fatigued and non-fatigued, as well as under single-task (only walking) and dual-task (walking while performing a cognitive task) conditions. We first computed standard population-level ANOVA models to evaluate differences in gait parameters (stride length and stride time) across conditions. Then, we estimated the effect of the interventions on gait parameters on the individual level through Bayesian linear mixed models, viewing each participant as their own trial, and compared the results. The results illustrated that while few overall population-level effects were visible, individual-level analyses showed nuanced differences between participants. Baseline values of the gait parameters varied largely among all participants, and the changes induced by fatigue and cognitive task performance were also highly heterogeneous, with some individuals showing effects in opposite direction. These differences between population-level and individual-level analyses were more pronounced for the fatigue intervention compared to the cognitive task intervention. Following our empirical analysis, we discuss re-analyzing population studies through the lens of N-of-1 trials more generally and highlight important considerations and requirements. Our work encourages future studies to investigate individual effects using population-level data.

stat.AP↗