Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Julien Bel

Publications and source records attributed to Julien Bel.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Non-local bias contribution to third-order galaxy correlations

We study halo clustering bias with second- and third-order statistics of halo and matter density fields in the MICE Grand Challenge simulation. We verify that two-point correlations deliver reliable estimates of the linear bias parameters at large scales, while estimations from the variance can be significantly affected by non-linear and possibly non-local contributions to the bias function. Combining three-point auto- and cross-correlations we find, for the first time in configuration space, evidence for the presence of such non-local contributions. These contributions are consistent with predicted second-order non-local effects on the bias functions originating from the dark matter tidal field. Samples of massive haloes show indications of bias (local or non-local) beyond second order. Ignoring non-local bias causes $20-30$\% and $5-10$\% overestimation of the linear bias from three-point auto- and cross-correlations respectively. We study two third-order bias estimators which are not affected by second-order non-local contributions. One is a combination of three-point auto- and cross- correlation. The other is a combination of third-order one- and two-point cumulants. Both methods deliver accurate bias estimations of the linear bias. Furthermore their estimations of second-order bias agree mutually. Ignoring non-local bias causes higher values of the second-order bias from three-point correlations. Our results demonstrate that third-order statistics can be employed for breaking the growth-bias degeneracy.

astro-ph.CO↗

Cosmological tests of modified gravity: constraints on $F(R)$ theories from the galaxy clustering ratio

The clustering ratio $η$, a large-scale structure observable originally designed to constrain the shape of the power spectrum of matter density fluctuations, is shown to provide a sensitive probe of the nature of gravity in the cosmological regime. We apply this analysis to $F(R)$ theories of gravity using the luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample extracted from the spectroscopic Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data release 7 and 10 catalogues. We find that General Relativity (GR), complemented with a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmological model with parameters fixed by the Planck satellite, describes extremely well the clustering of galaxies up to $z\sim 0.6$. On large cosmic scales, the absolute amplitude of deviations from GR, $|f_{R_0 }|$, is constrained to be smaller than $4.6 \times 10^{-5}$ at the $95\%$ confidence level. This bound makes cosmological probes of gravity almost competitive with the sensitivity of Solar System tests, although still one order of magnitude less effective than astrophysical tests. We also extrapolate our results to future large surveys like Euclid and show that the astrophysical bound will certainly remain out of reach for such a class of modified-gravity models that only differ from $Λ$CDM at low redshifts.

astro-ph.CO↗

Comparing halo bias from abundance and clustering

We model the abundance of haloes in the $\sim(3 \ \text{Gpc}/h)^3$ volume of the MICE Grand Challenge simulation by fitting the universal mass function with an improved Jack-Knife error covariance estimator that matches theory predictions. We present unifying relations between different fitting models and new predictions for linear ($b_1$) and non-linear ($c_2$ and $c_3$) halo clustering bias. Different mass function fits show strong variations in their performance when including the low mass range ($M_h \lesssim 3 \ 10^{12} \ M_{\odot}/h$) in the analysis. Together with fits from the literature we find an overall variation in the amplitudes of around $10$% in the low mass and up to $50$% in the high mass (galaxy cluster) range ($M_h > 10^{14} \ M_{\odot}/h$). These variations propagate into a $10$% change in $b_1$ predictions and a $50$% change in $c_2$ or $c_3$. Despite these strong variations we find universal relations between $b_1$ and $c_2$ or $c_3$ for which we provide simple fits. Excluding low mass haloes, different models fitted with reasonable goodness in this analysis, show percent level agreement in their $b_1$ predictions, but are systematically $5-10$% lower than the bias directly measured with two-point halo-mass clustering. This result confirms previous findings derived from smaller volumes (and smaller masses). Inaccuracies in the bias predictions lead to $5-10$% errors in growth measurements. They also affect any HOD fitting or (cluster) mass calibration from clustering measurements.

astro-ph.CO↗

Measuring the growth of matter fluctuations with third-order galaxy correlations

Measurements of the linear growth factor $D$ at different redshifts $z$ are key to distinguish among cosmological models. One can estimate the derivative $dD(z)/d\ln(1+z)$ from redshift space measurements of the 3D anisotropic galaxy two-point correlation $ξ(z)$, but the degeneracy of its transverse (or projected) component with galaxy bias $b$, i.e. $ξ_{\perp}(z) \propto\ D^2(z) b^2(z)$, introduces large errors in the growth measurement. Here we present a comparison between two methods which break this degeneracy by combining second- and third-order statistics. One uses the shape of the reduced three-point correlation and the other a combination of third-order one- and two-point cumulants. These methods use the fact that, for Gaussian initial conditions and scales larger than $20$ $h^{-1}$Mpc, the reduced third-order matter correlations are independent of redshift (and therefore of the growth factor) while the third-order galaxy correlations depend on $b$. We use matter and halo catalogs from the MICE-GC simulation to test how well we can recover $b(z)$ and therefore $D(z)$ with these methods in 3D real space. We also present a new approach, which enables us to measure $D$ directly from the redshift evolution of second- and third-order galaxy correlations without the need of modelling matter correlations. For haloes with masses lower than $10^{14}$ $h^{-1}$M$_\odot$, we find $10%$ deviations between the different estimates of $D$, which are comparable to current observational errors. At higher masses we find larger differences that can probably be attributed to the breakdown of the bias model and non-Poissonian shot noise.

astro-ph.CO↗

Probing non-standard gravity with the growth index: a background independent analysis

Measurements of the growth index $γ(z)$ provide a clue as to whether Einstein's field equations encompass gravity also on large cosmic scales, those where the expansion of the universe accelerates. We show that the information encoded in this function can be satisfactorily parameterized using a small set of coefficients $γ_i$ in such a way that the true scaling of the growth index is recovered to better than $1\%$ in most dark energy and dark gravity models. We find that the likelihood of current data is maximal for $γ_0=0.74\pm 0.44$ and $γ_1=0.01\pm0.46$, a measurement compatible with the $Λ$CDM predictions. Moreover data favor models predicting slightly less growth of structures than the Planck LambdaCDM scenario. The main aim of the paper is to provide a prescription for routinely calculating, in an analytic way, the amplitude of the growth indices $γ_i$ in relevant cosmological scenarios, and to show that these parameters naturally define a space where predictions of alternative theories of gravity can be compared against growth data in a manner which is independent from the expansion history of the cosmological background. As the standard $Ω$-plane provides a tool to identify different expansion histories $H(t)$ and their relation to various cosmological models, the $γ$-plane can thus be used to locate different growth rate histories $f(t)$ and their relation to alternatives model of gravity. As a result, we find that the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati gravity model is rejected with a $95\%$ confidence level. By simulating future data sets, such as those that a Euclid-like mission will provide, we also show how to tell apart LambdaCDM predictions from those of more extreme possibilities, such as smooth dark energy models, clustering quintessence or parameterized post-Friedmann cosmological models.

astro-ph.CO↗

Determination of the abundance of cosmic matter via the cell count moments of the galaxy distribution (1)

We demonstrate that accurate and precise information about the matter content of the universe can be retrieved via a simple cell count analysis of the 3D spatial distribution of galaxies. A new clustering statistic, the {\it galaxy clustering ratio} $η$, is the key in this process. This is defined as the ratio between one- and two-point second-order moments of the smoothed galaxy density distribution. The distinguishing feature of this statistic is its universality: on large cosmic scales both galaxies (in redshift space) and mass (in real space) display the same $η$ amplitude. This quantity, in addition, does not evolve as a function of redshift. As a consequence, the $η$ statistic provides insight into characteristic parameters of the real-space power spectrum of mass density fluctuations without the need to specify the galaxy biasing function, a model for galaxy redshift distortions nor the growing mode of density ripples. We demonstrate the method with the luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample extracted from the spectroscopic Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data release 7 (DR7) catalogue. Taking weak (flat) priors of the curvature of the universe ($Ω_k$) and of the constant value of the dark energy equation of state ($w$), and strong (gaussian) priors of the physical baryon density $Ω_bh^2$, of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and of the spectral index of primordial density perturbations $n_s$, we estimate the abundance of matter with a relative error of 8% ($Ω_m= 0.283\pm0.023$). We expect that this approach will be instrumental in searching for evidence of new physics beyond the standard model of cosmology and in planning future redshift surveys such as BigBOSS or EUCLID.

astro-ph.CO↗