Juliette M. Limozin | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Improving Longitudinal Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Target Trial Emulation using Joint Calibrated Weights

In target trial emulation (TTE), marginal structural models (MSMs) can be used to characterise per-protocol treatment effects over time. The MSM parameters are often estimated by inverse probability weighting (IPW), with weights estimated by maximum likelihood. However, IPW-based estimators can be unstable in small samples and are sensitive to misspecification of the weight models. An alternative method for estimating the MSM parameters is longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimation (LTMLE). LTMLE is double robust and potentially more efficient than IPW. Nevertheless, LTMLE also relies on inverse probability weights and may therefore share the instability of IPW-based estimators. We propose joint calibrated LTMLE, which integrates LTMLE with joint calibrated weights tailored for per-protocol effect estimation in TTE. This calibration of weights improves finite-sample performance by enforcing covariate balance in both the treatment and censoring processes simultaneously. Simulations show that the proposed method has improved efficiency and robustness to weight model misspecification, compared to standard LTMLE. We illustrate the method using a case study to evaluate the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on CD4 cell count among HIV-positive women.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2024

Inference procedures in sequential trial emulation with survival outcomes: comparing confidence intervals based on the sandwich variance estimator, bootstrap and jackknife

Sequential trial emulation (STE) is an approach to estimating causal treatment effects by emulating a sequence of target trials from observational data. In STE, inverse probability weighting is commonly utilised to address time-varying confounding and/or dependent censoring. Then structural models for potential outcomes are applied to the weighted data to estimate treatment effects. For inference, the simple sandwich variance estimator is popular but conservative, while nonparametric bootstrap is computationally expensive, and a more efficient alternative, linearised estimating function (LEF) bootstrap, has not been adapted to STE. We evaluated the performance of various methods for constructing confidence intervals (CIs) of marginal risk differences in STE with survival outcomes by comparing the coverage of CIs based on nonparametric/LEF bootstrap, jackknife, and the sandwich variance estimator through simulations. LEF bootstrap CIs demonstrated the best coverage with small/moderate sample sizes, low event rates and low treatment prevalence, which were the motivating scenarios for STE. They were less affected by treatment group imbalance and faster to compute than nonparametric bootstrap CIs. With large sample sizes and medium/high event rates, the sandwich-variance-estimator-based CIs had the best coverage and were the fastest to compute. These findings offer guidance in constructing CIs in causal survival analysis using STE.

stat.ME↗