arXiv subjects

Junhui Cai

Publications and source records attributed to Junhui Cai.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Poisson-MNL Bandit: Nearly Optimal Dynamic Joint Assortment and Pricing with Decision-Dependent Customer Arrivals

We study dynamic joint assortment and pricing where a seller updates decisions at regular accounting/operating intervals to maximize the cumulative per-period revenue over a horizon $T$. In many settings, assortment and prices affect not only what an arriving customer buys but also how many customers arrive within the period, whereas classical multinomial logit (MNL) models assume arrivals as fixed, potentially leading to suboptimal decisions. We propose a Poisson-MNL model that couples a contextual MNL choice model with a Poisson arrival model whose rate depends on the offered assortment and prices. Building on this model, we develop an efficient algorithm PMNL based on the idea of upper confidence bound (UCB). We establish its (near) optimality by proving a non-asymptotic regret bound of order $\sqrt{T\log{T}}$ and a matching lower bound (up to $\log T$). Simulation studies underscore the importance of accounting for the dependency of arrival rates on assortment and pricing: PMNL effectively learns customer choice and arrival models and provides joint assortment-pricing decisions that outperform others that assume fixed arrival rates.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2023

Doubly High-Dimensional Contextual Bandits: An Interpretable Model for Joint Assortment-Pricing

Key challenges in running a retail business include how to select products to present to consumers (the assortment problem), and how to price products (the pricing problem) to maximize revenue or profit. Instead of considering these problems in isolation, we propose a joint approach to assortment-pricing based on contextual bandits. Our model is doubly high-dimensional, in that both context vectors and actions are allowed to take values in high-dimensional spaces. In order to circumvent the curse of dimensionality, we propose a simple yet flexible model that captures the interactions between covariates and actions via a (near) low-rank representation matrix. The resulting class of models is reasonably expressive while remaining interpretable through latent factors, and includes various structured linear bandit and pricing models as particular cases. We propose a computationally tractable procedure that combines an exploration/exploitation protocol with an efficient low-rank matrix estimator, and we prove bounds on its regret. Simulation results show that this method has lower regret than state-of-the-art methods applied to various standard bandit and pricing models. Real-world case studies on the assortment-pricing problem, from an industry-leading instant noodles company to an emerging beauty start-up, underscore the gains achievable using our method. In each case, we show at least three-fold gains in revenue or profit by our bandit method, as well as the interpretability of the latent factor models that are learned.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2021

Network regression and supervised centrality estimation

The centrality in a network is often used to measure nodes' importance and model network effects on a certain outcome. Empirical studies widely adopt a two-stage procedure, which first estimates the centrality from the observed noisy network and then infers the network effect from the estimated centrality, even though it lacks theoretical understanding. We propose a unified modeling framework to study the properties of centrality estimation and inference and the subsequent network regression analysis with noisy network observations. Furthermore, we propose a supervised centrality estimation methodology, which aims to simultaneously estimate both centrality and network effect. We showcase the advantages of our method compared with the two-stage method both theoretically and numerically via extensive simulations and a case study in predicting currency risk premiums from the global trade network.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2021

Nonparametric Empirical Bayes Estimation and Testing for Sparse and Heteroscedastic Signals

Large-scale modern data often involves estimation and testing for high-dimensional unknown parameters. It is desirable to identify the sparse signals, ``the needles in the haystack'', with accuracy and false discovery control. However, the unprecedented complexity and heterogeneity in modern data structure require new machine learning tools to effectively exploit commonalities and to robustly adjust for both sparsity and heterogeneity. In addition, estimates for high-dimensional parameters often lack uncertainty quantification. In this paper, we propose a novel Spike-and-Nonparametric mixture prior (SNP) -- a spike to promote the sparsity and a nonparametric structure to capture signals. In contrast to the state-of-the-art methods, the proposed methods solve the estimation and testing problem at once with several merits: 1) an accurate sparsity estimation; 2) point estimates with shrinkage/soft-thresholding property; 3) credible intervals for uncertainty quantification; 4) an optimal multiple testing procedure that controls false discovery rate. Our method exhibits promising empirical performance on both simulated data and a gene expression case study.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2019

All of Linear Regression

Least squares linear regression is one of the oldest and widely used data analysis tools. Although the theoretical analysis of the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator is as old, several fundamental questions are yet to be answered. Suppose regression observations $(X_1,Y_1),\ldots,(X_n,Y_n)\in\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbb{R}$ (not necessarily independent) are available. Some of the questions we deal with are as follows: under what conditions, does the OLS estimator converge and what is the limit? What happens if the dimension is allowed to grow with $n$? What happens if the observations are dependent with dependence possibly strengthening with $n$? How to do statistical inference under these kinds of misspecification? What happens to the OLS estimator under variable selection? How to do inference under misspecification and variable selection? We answer all the questions raised above with one simple deterministic inequality which holds for any set of observations and any sample size. This implies that all our results are a finite sample (non-asymptotic) in nature. In the end, one only needs to bound certain random quantities under specific settings of interest to get concrete rates and we derive these bounds for the case of independent observations. In particular, the problem of inference after variable selection is studied, for the first time, when $d$, the number of covariates increases (almost exponentially) with sample size $n$. We provide comments on the ``right'' statistic to consider for inference under variable selection and efficient computation of quantiles.

math.ST↗