SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Junzhe Ding

Publications and source records attributed to Junzhe Ding.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Strictly Proper Scoring-Rule Theory for Calibrating Stochastic Car-Following Models

Problem definition: Fixed parameters and inputs in a stochastic simulator induce a distribution over complete trajectories, not one trajectory. Calibration must assess this distribution, including variability and temporal dependence, against observations. Yet stochastic car-following models are commonly calibrated with trajectory-error objectives inherited from deterministic modelling. Methodology/results: We establish a scoring-rule theory of stochastic calibration. Strict propriety requires the data-generating distribution to uniquely minimise expected score. MRMean-I, the average run-wise error, drives separable stochastic spread to zero; MRMean-II, the error of the ensemble-mean trajectory, cannot identify a parameter that changes only spread; and MRMin, the error of the closest simulated run, has a population target that changes with ensemble size. These results are confirmed for stochastic Intelligent Driver Model extensions with additive acceleration noise and random desired headway. We recommend exact maximum likelihood when the correct transition density is available; otherwise, an unbiased simulation-based estimator of a strictly proper score. The energy score meets this requirement and gives the best held-out distributional prediction among the evaluated simulation-based objectives, although both models retain too-narrow bands and miss persistent disturbances. Implications:Strict propriety separates a valid calibration target from parameter identifiability and model adequacy. The theory applies to vector-valued outputs from stochastic transportation simulators; the car-following experiments illustrate its scope.

stat.ME

A Structured Framework for Calibrating Stochastic Car-Following Models: Data Adequacy, Parameter Sensitivity, and Objective Selection

Calibrating a stochastic car-following model is harder than its deterministic counterpart: the loss itself becomes a random variable, so a favorable random realization can be mistaken for a good parameter vector. This paper develops a structured framework for calibrating stochastic car-following models -- a completeness-controlled synthetic design, a corrected variance-based sensitivity analysis (VBSA), and the minimum-realization (MRMIN) calibration protocol -- across two structurally different stochastic mechanisms, QIDM and IDM2D. We test two claims from deterministic calibration -- that a small number of parameters, and the trajectory itself above all, dominates the sensitivity ranking, and that spacing calibration keeps dominating speed calibration once dynamics are stochastic -- and ask whether a model's noise term can be calibrated on its own. In a balanced synthetic experiment, driving-regime completeness has a mean total-effect index on par with the model's most influential parameter and roughly two orders of magnitude above pair identity, extending rather than reversing the deterministic finding on trajectory-identity dominance. Under MRMIN, calibrating only the noise parameter against a population-wide deterministic fit more than doubles median spacing error across 1644 NGSIM trajectories, but fitting the deterministic parameters per trajectory first and calibrating noise on top recovers it. Spacing calibration remains more cross-dimensionally robust than speed calibration on average, but the deterministic guarantee that this dominance can never reverse is violated in 19-26% of trajectories for both mechanisms. A multi-objective screen in relative-error space then favors joint spacing-speed goodness-of-fit functions over single-dimension spacing calibration. Deterministic calibration guarantees should therefore be re-tested, not assumed, once a model is stochastic.

physics.soc-ph