Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

K. B. J. Anuradha

Publications and source records attributed to K. B. J. Anuradha.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Multi-Objective Planning of Community Energy Storage Systems Under Uncertainty

This paper evaluates how the planning of a community energy storage (CES) system under different energy trading schemes (ETSs) can benefit low voltage (LV) prosumers and the CES provider equitably. First, we consider an ETS where the CES provider trades energy with prosumers at the average grid energy trading price, second, an ETS where the CES provider trades energy at a higher price than the grid energy trading price, and third, an ETS where the CES provider trades energy at a lower price than the grid energy trading price. To this end, we present a multi-objective stochastic optimization framework to minimize the investment and annual operating costs of the CES provider and annual operating costs of prosumers, taking into account the uncertainties of real and reactive energy consumption and photovoltaic (PV) generation of prosumers. The uncertainties are modeled using the normal probability density function. Then, the roulette wheel mechanism (RWM) is exploited to formulate a scenario-based stochastic program. The initial scenarios obtained from the RWM, are then reduced using the K-Means clustering algorithm, to make the problem tractable. Our experiments show that the ETS where the CES provider trades energy at the average grid energy trading price benefits prosumers and the CES provider more equitably than the other two ETSs.

eess.SY↗

A Multi-Objective Planning and Scheduling Framework for Community Energy Storage Systems in Low Voltage Distribution Networks

This paper presents a methodology for optimizing the planning and scheduling aspects of a community energy storage (CES) system in the presence of solar photovoltaic (SPV) power in low voltage (LV) distribution networks. To this end, we develop a multi-objective optimization framework that minimizes the real power loss, the energy trading cost of LV customers and the CES provider with the grid, and the investment cost for the CES. Distribution network limits including the voltage constraint are also taken into account by combining the optimization problem with a linearized power flow model. Simulations for the proposed optimization framework with real power consumption and SPV generation data of the customers, highlight both real power loss and energy trading cost with the grid are reduced compared with the case without a CES by nearly 29% and 16%, respectively. Moreover, a case study justifies our methodology is competent in attaining the three objectives better than the optimization models which optimize only the CES scheduling.

eess.SY↗