Kaleel Mahmood — Page 2

arXiv2021

Beware the Black-Box: on the Robustness of Recent Defenses to Adversarial Examples

Many defenses have recently been proposed at venues like NIPS, ICML, ICLR and CVPR. These defenses are mainly focused on mitigating white-box attacks. They do not properly examine black-box attacks. In this paper, we expand upon the analysis of these defenses to include adaptive black-box adversaries. Our evaluation is done on nine defenses including Barrage of Random Transforms, ComDefend, Ensemble Diversity, Feature Distillation, The Odds are Odd, Error Correcting Codes, Distribution Classifier Defense, K-Winner Take All and Buffer Zones. Our investigation is done using two black-box adversarial models and six widely studied adversarial attacks for CIFAR-10 and Fashion-MNIST datasets. Our analyses show most recent defenses (7 out of 9) provide only marginal improvements in security ($<25\%$), as compared to undefended networks. For every defense, we also show the relationship between the amount of data the adversary has at their disposal, and the effectiveness of adaptive black-box attacks. Overall, our results paint a clear picture: defenses need both thorough white-box and black-box analyses to be considered secure. We provide this large scale study and analyses to motivate the field to move towards the development of more robust black-box defenses.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

BUZz: BUffer Zones for defending adversarial examples in image classification

We propose a novel defense against all existing gradient based adversarial attacks on deep neural networks for image classification problems. Our defense is based on a combination of deep neural networks and simple image transformations. While straightforward in implementation, this defense yields a unique security property which we term buffer zones. We argue that our defense based on buffer zones offers significant improvements over state-of-the-art defenses. We are able to achieve this improvement even when the adversary has access to the {\em entire} original training data set and unlimited query access to the defense. We verify our claim through experimentation using Fashion-MNIST and CIFAR-10: We demonstrate $<11\%$ attack success rate -- significantly lower than what other well-known state-of-the-art defenses offer -- at only a price of a $11-18\%$ drop in clean accuracy. By using a new intuitive metric, we explain why this trade-off offers a significant improvement over prior work.

cs.LG↗