arXiv subjects

Karolina Gliszczyńska-Schroeder

Publications and source records attributed to Karolina Gliszczyńska-Schroeder.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Kernel Balancing in Tree-based Methods

Studying heterogeneous treatment effects has become essential in experimental and observational studies. A critical assumption for obtaining reliable treatment effect estimates is overlap, which requires that treated and control units have sufficiently similar covariate distributions. Poor overlap may limit the effectiveness of estimators, especially those based on propensity scores, potentially leading to unreliable results. We investigate the effectiveness of kernel balancing (KBal) (Hazlett, 2020) as an alternative to propensity score methods for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation, particularly in settings with overlap violations. Building on optimization-based balancing approaches, we integrate KBal weights into tree-based methods, specifically, causal forests (Athey et al., 2019) and the X-Learner (XRF) (Künzel et al., 2019), to assess their impact on bias reduction and estimation precision. Monte Carlo evidence shows that KBal achieves near-exact balance in a transformed feature space, thereby improving treatment effect estimation in cases where traditional reweighting methods struggle due to extreme weights, finite-sample bias, or insufficient removal of pre-existing confounding bias. We apply the proposed methods to the semi-synthetic IHDP benchmark dataset. Overall, the results indicate that KBal leads to performance improvements, especially in settings with nonlinear treatment effects and limited overlap, making it a useful alternative to propensity score methods.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Effects with Tree-Based Methods under Imperfect Compliance

We study the impact of conditional complier average causal effect (CCACE) estimation methods on the performance of subgroup discovery and heterogeneous causal effect estimation under imperfect compliance. Building on the Bayesian Causal Forest with Instrumental Variable (BCF-IV) (Bargagli-Stoffi et al. (2022)) method, we introduce a two-step, model-agnostic approach that allows any suitable machine learning method to be used for the CCACE estimation in the first step. Specifically, we implement two non-Bayesian tree-based methods, both using forest-based learners: DRRF-IV, a debiased transformed-outcome regression-forest approach, and a GRF-based IV adaptation of the generalized random forest framework (Athey et al., 2019). Through a simulation study, we assess the precision, bias, and the ability to correctly identify the underlying subgroup structure of the proposed methods relative to BCF-IV. The results show that the non-Bayesian methods perform competitively across the considered simulation settings, with performance improving for larger sample sizes and moderately large treatment effects, while reducing computational runtime. We apply our new methods by revisiting an empirical study that examines the effect of prompt admission to intensive care units (ICU) on 28-day mortality across 48 UK National Health Service hospitals. While previous work finds no significant overall treatment effect, we investigate whether subgroups of patients may benefit more from prompt ICU admission.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Median-based Splitting Rules for Causal Trees and Forests

Heavy-tailed and skewed outcomes are common in the randomized experiments and observational studies used to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects, yet the mean-squared-error criterion that guides splitting in honest causal trees is sensitive to the extreme values they generate. Building on the causal forest framework (Athey and Imbens, 2016; Wager and Athey, 2018), we introduce the Median Squared Deviation (MSD) criterion, which replaces the leafwise difference in means in the honest splitting objective with the Hodges--Lehmann location estimator while leaving honest leaf estimation and forest inference unchanged. Two further median-based rules, the Median Absolute Deviation (MAD) and the Least Median of Squares (LMS), serve as robust baselines. We evaluate the criteria in a simulation study covering precision, bias, and confidence interval coverage. MSD restricts its robustness to split selection and lowers the error of conditional average treatment effect estimates under heavy-tailed and skewed outcomes. Further, we re-visit two empirical applications: the first analyzes the electoral effects of a Mexican conditional cash transfer program on precinct-level observations, while the second application studies antiretroviral treatments in HIV-positive adults.

econ.EM↗