SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Kathryn Vasilaky

Publications and source records attributed to Kathryn Vasilaky.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Control Function Framework for Mitigating Position Bias in Learning to Rank Systems

Learning-to-rank (LTR) systems commonly depend on implicit feedback, such as user clicks, because it is easy to collect and can serve as a valuable signal of user preferences. However, directly optimizing ranking models using implicit feedback data often yields suboptimal performance because such data is inherently skewed by systematic biases. Among these biases, position bias is particularly pervasive: items ranked higher tend to receive disproportionately more interactions, regardless of their actual relevance. To address this, we introduce a novel two-stage framework based on control functions. In the first stage, we utilize exogenous variation from the residuals of the ranking process, which are then incorporated into a second stage click model to account for position-dependent distortions. In contrast to existing methods, our approach avoids explicit propensity estimation, supports nonlinear ranking models, and can be flexibly incorporated into any state-of-the-art ranking algorithm for position bias correction. We also propose a debiasing strategy for validation clicks that enables reliable hyperparameter tuning in the absence of unbiased validation data. Empirical results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art position bias correction methods on both benchmark and real-world industrial datasets.

cs.IR

Correcting for Selection Bias in Learning-to-rank Systems

Click data collected by modern recommendation systems are an important source of observational data that can be utilized to train learning-to-rank (LTR) systems. However, these data suffer from a number of biases that can result in poor performance for LTR systems. Recent methods for bias correction in such systems mostly focus on position bias, the fact that higher ranked results (e.g., top search engine results) are more likely to be clicked even if they are not the most relevant results given a user's query. Less attention has been paid to correcting for selection bias, which occurs because clicked documents are reflective of what documents have been shown to the user in the first place. Here, we propose new counterfactual approaches which adapt Heckman's two-stage method and accounts for selection and position bias in LTR systems. Our empirical evaluation shows that our proposed methods are much more robust to noise and have better accuracy compared to existing unbiased LTR algorithms, especially when there is moderate to no position bias.

cs.IR