SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Katsuya Ogata

Publications and source records attributed to Katsuya Ogata.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Virtual Encoders in Multimodal Transformers

Multimodal language models traditionally rely on dedicated perceptual encoders to construct task-usable representations. More integrated architectures have recently emerged, which instead expose the shared transformer to lightly projected patches, audio frames, or discrete visual tokens. Where does this encoding happen when such representations are not provided? We find that the transformer can internalize this missing computation, constructing task-usable perceptual representations within its own early-to-middle layers before the downstream language model. We call this computational structure a Virtual Encoder. Across linear probing, similarities to perceptual encoders, and causal analyses, we identify signatures of this structure in models that receive perceptual tokens without continuous encoder-derived features. These analyses also suggest that the boundary between perception and language processing need not coincide within an architectural module. Instead, encoder-like computation can emerge as a functional regime within a shared transformer, providing a new perspective for understanding where and how multimodal models process perception.

cs.CV

MEDit-Bench: A Dataset for Evaluating Message-Driven Narrative Video Editing

Video editing is fundamentally message-driven: even from the same source footage, the selected shots change depending on the narrative the editor wishes to convey. Benchmarks for a closely related task, video summarization, reduce editorial intent to a single, message-agnostic notion of saliency and thus do not account for this diversity. For evaluating message-driven video editing, we present \textbf{MEDit-Bench}, a dataset and benchmark, which pairs long-form videos with multiple editing messages and multiple professionally produced edits per message, demonstrating that different messages yield substantially different edits from the same source. We define an automatic evaluation protocol based on temporal alignment metrics, and find that an LLM-as-a-judge preference, a natural proxy for narrative quality, is unreliable for this task due to severe position bias. We additionally annotate each message with ambiguity and contextfulness scores, and show that both dimensions negatively correlate with model performance, establishing message difficulty as a meaningful stratification factor. Experiments with state-of-the-art MLLMs and reinforcement fine-tuned baselines show that while strong models approach human temporal alignment at lenient thresholds, all models fall behind humans at stricter criteria. A human perceptual study further confirms a large quality gap, with professional human edits remaining consistently preferred over model outputs.

cs.CV